Pixote

Booker is the real deal. It's going to be fun watching him mature. Poles made an awesome pick.

There was 2:24 remaining in the second quarter. The third down was the last play he would make before being taken out of the game. He was pressured. Overthrew Rome in the end zone. Would have been a tough throw, but one a top QB should make, even under pressure. That is why we drafted him. His ability to make tough throws under pressure. Hey, it is his first game. I'm disappointed he didn't hit Rome for the touchdown. That would have been the icing on the cake. He had a good game to build on going forward.

I'd be more impressed if he had hit the open receiver in the end zone instead of the Bears having to kick another FG. Good start for Caleb. I'm just happy he made it through his first experience without getting injured. We need to get this OL fixed. On another note, I see our new DC calling plays on the sideline. Interesting, and unexpected.

You might be right. "Fieldman" looked good to me. ?

I know, in watching his college tape, Booker has exceptional "bend & speed" moves. Here is an interesting excerpt from his rookie diary on the Bears' website published this morning.:

I'm guessing his injury is the issue. Otherwise, Miami would not have released him, and it wouldn't have taken this long for another team to sign him.

Connor Williams just signed with Seattle. Ex-Dolphins OL Connor Williams signing one-year, $6M deal with Seahawks

Okay, I will throw in my 2 cents, and an observation that may be totally off base. I'm 99.99% sure it was Cunningham who urged Poles to be patient and not trade up. Somewhere in my age-shortened memory, I remember this being stated by Poles. Yes, Warren was seen in the video saying the old "we (I) told you so" but here is the twist I see. Did anyone else notice this during the rain delay? Michaels and Aikman were interviewing Warren and Poles. The first question was directed to Warren, who gave a lengthy answer. It seemed to me Michaels was anxious for him to finish so he could ask Poles a question about his rebuilding the roster. When Warren finished, Michaels asked a question that was obviously directed to Poles, but Warren jumped in and answered it, leaving Poles & Michaels looking a bit surprised. The next two questions, Aikman and Michaels, prefaced, making sure there was no doubt they were directed to Poles for an answer. While Poles answered the questions, I thought Warren looked pissed, like he was upset he was no longer getting the attention I think he thrives on. I could be totally off base. His facial expression could be misread. God knows, I look like I am pissed off at the world, even when I am watching a show I think is hilarious. I would be deadly playing Texas Holdem' ? I love Warren's hire. He will give us a showcase, a stadium to be proud of, and eventually a SB hosting offer. However, it appears to me he has a personality flaw. He wants to be the center of attention. And in this case, "AFTER" it was proven Cunningham's suggestion that Poles should be patient paid off, I think he jumped in to try to grab some of the spotlight/credit.

Something every Bears fan should take pride in: 23,204 men have played pro football. 6,082 have died. 17,122 players are still living. As of 2024, there will be a total of 378 members of the Hall of Fame. Of the 378 members of the NFL HOF, 32 are Chicago Bears.

I just read that Tennessee, our week 1 opponent, lost its #1 WR (DeAndre Hopkins) for four weeks due to a knee injury. (I doubt, at the age of 32, he will recover in time to start week 1.) That leaves them with Ridley as their top receiving threat. JJ will have no trouble shutting him down. So many injuries this preseason, seemingly many more than normal. Happy we are sitting out our starters in this 'extra' preseason 'meaningless' game.

Agree. On another note, it appears from every site I visit that the Bears' offensive line is BAD. Wright is being blown up by Sweat on every attempt to block him. Both of the guys fighting for Center are being overpowered by Dexter. Davis continues with his missed practices. Jenkins had a scare in practice but he was able to shake it off and return a play later. Jones was 50/50 on success against the rush. This SUCKS! DAMN IT! We need to get this fixed, and FAST!

Read this on the net this morning while making my normal round of visits. It seems there are those who believe the Bears might be a suitor for NE's Mathew Judon. He is upset he is not getting an extension. He is 31, soon to be 32, but if healthy (He had an injury last year) would be awesome opposite Sweat. Could be just blowing smoke. I have mixed feelings. It seems to me that Poles and Flus believe in Dexter & Booker to give our pass rush a boost. Here is the article: Insider Confirms Matthew Judon is in Play for he Bears

You also have to remember that this is just fluff—an extra preseason game. I suspect we will see some reps from starters in the following regular preseason matchups. It seems every other day, I read about a player on another team going down for the season with an injury. The last thing we need is to lose one of our key starters.

Fantastic! As has already been noted above, by signing him now, with WR contracts escalating rapidly, we not only save big time going forward but also ensure we do not lose him in the free-agent market. That trade with Carolina will be remembered as one of the best negotiated in the history of the NFL. Just saw this on the Bears.com site, answering a question posed: So he continues on his current contract for 2024 & 2025, then the new 4 yr. contract kicks in, assuring he is a Bear for 6 more years.

I am reading on NFL.com that Caleb will not play in the HOF game. Caleb Williams, Bears starters won't play in Hall of Fame Game; Tyson Bagent to start at QB vs. Texans

I couldn't agree more. Now that we have so much invested in our offensive skill positions, we must address this serious issue. I hope Poles will have this under control and we will see a vast improvement in 2024. Next year's draft has to concentrate on OL as its top priority,

I just read another article on a site I love for unique information I do not see anywhere else on the internet. It always comes across as legitimate and not clickbait. Ryan Griffin. Have you ever heard of him? I hadn't. Yet, it turns out that this was the guy Poles brought in as a veteran mentor for Caleb instead of having to pay a veteran Quarterback a respectable salary to sit behind him on the bench. Griffin has quite a history. Has spent two seasons with Brady, two years with Brees, was a 10 year veteran, and a great locker room leader. An interesting article (and a short and quick read) that proves more than ever, to me, that Poles is quite crafty and thinks outside the box as an innovative GM. We Finally Know Why Chicago Bears Refuse to Sign a Veteran Backup QB

Okay, Bears related due to our mutual dislike of Aaron Rogers. LOL I just read Rogers was mad at his teammates, calling them out on the field, because the offense was struggling in camp. This after he was AWOL from camp while on vacation. What an a**hole.

Because he sucked a** at the start of the season and only began to "shine" the second half of the season, he then blew away Dallas in the playoffs and returned to suck against SF. So he was a Jekyll and Hyde QB last year.

For sure, he would be traded, or cut, and not resigned. If kept, it would have been a stop gap. Maybe start games up until the trade deadline, then when the rookie was ready, trade him. Who knows, a team might have been desperate at that time if their starter went down and give us more than we got from Pittsburgh.

Depends. If we hadn't been in a position to draft Williams, would we have drafted a QB later that would be ready to start the first game of the season? If yes, I agree, they would have still traded Fields. If not, and the rookie QB had to sit for a spell, I suspect they would have kept Fields until the rookie was ready to start. As much as I like Baget, I don't think they would have turned the keys of the Offense over to him during that learning process.

It's difficult to believe (and painful to remember) that just two years ago before Poles began transforming the team, we were considered to have one of the worst roster of players in the league. We were laughed at, and unfortunately, rightfully so. What a difference with Poles as our GM!

I spend a lot of time scouring the internet for anything related to the Bears. It isn't easy to separate hype from reality. With that said, I honestly believe Dexter will be a monster 3T for us this year and going forward. Toward the end of last year, he provided us with a glimpse of his amazing talent. He redefined his body through diet and exercise. His attitude and motivation are top-notch. I am also encouraged by our DC comments about Martin and Booker. This defense is on the verge of being a top 5. One more thing. I keep hearing positives about Williams and Scott's development of chemistry. Scott seems to be making an impact in every capsule I read about the practices. He might become the receiver many of us envisioned when drafted. Could he be Allen's replacement? (With the need to extend DJ's contract, I wonder if we can afford to resign Allen).

With all our roster additions and changes to our coaching staff, anything less than ten wins and a wildcard slot would be disappointing.

I've been reading some articles by some naysayers who question the positive outlook many of us have for the Bears offense in 2024. After all, we got a new OC to replace the dumbass we had last year. We added dynamic skill players to our offense. So why are they so negative? Do they dislike the Bears? So, I did some fact-checking. Last year, the Bears offense ranked #18 in points scored (360). Where did Seattle rank? They were #17 (364). I know we have a dynamic set of skill players, but we also have a rookie quarterback. Geno Smith, Metcalf, & Lockett are certainly a good set of players. So should we be concerned that they, with our new OC, were basically tied with us as middle-of-the-road offenses when viewed by points scored? After all, KC was #15 (371), and they won the SB AGAIN. So I checked the time of possession, another point of concern by some of the naysayers. I was surprised that the Bears were second in TOP (31.58 min p/g avg), only behind Cleveland (32.19). KC was 14th (30.28), and Seattle, with our OC in charge, was dead last (26.39). The naysayers point out that we may rack up more receiving years, but that will be offset by a drop in production from our running offense, which in turn will drop our time of possession, which was fueled last year by our rushing offense. (And Seattle's TOP was terrible the past two years because of a more aggressive passing game.) So, is this a reason for concern? Looking at KC's rankings, maybe points scored and TOP rankings are overrated? There are obviously other factors involved. Maybe it's a good thing we drafted a punter. LOL