BearFan PHX

Just to be clear, I have both called Eberflus "terrible" and "competent" what I mean is that as a head coach, his record and a lot of his strategic decisions and 4th quarter strategies have been terrible. But compared to any one of us (or at least me) or the average Madden player, Flus is a competent professional. He knows how to organize practices and meetings, and how to coach up a cover 2 for one example. I'm sure Eberflus has a eye for details that a guy like me would completely miss. Spacing on a cover 2 for example. Hes a pro, and Im just a fan. Out on the practice field, he has a career's worth of knowledge, that makes him a professional. But compared to other winning professional head coaches, he is terrible.

yes, the era of the Tampa Bay Bucs smothering you 13 to 9 and winning a Super Bowl with Trent Dilfer are over. The league has changed the rules to make this a scoring league. Now if your defense is really good and your QB is ok but not great, youre gonna win a bunch of regular season games against the bottom half of the league. But I think it's a mistake to see progress from 3 wins to 8 wins as automatically fortelling a playoff winning team right around the corner. Once you get to the top 10 teams, you gotta score points to beat them, because they are going to find a way to score on you too, no matter how good your defense is. Progress in stats is a funny thing, as you elevate from the bottom to the middle, it looks like the trend line is continuing upward, but thats where context comes into things. Getting into the top 5 teams is a wholly different thing than climbing out of the basement.

the brightest spot this year has been watching the rookies and second year players on defense develop. that definitely has our arrow pointing up. no matter how bad our offense is next year, we will win more than 5 games for sure, and I doubt we will be in the hunt for a top draft pick again for a while.

To be fair, Claypool definitely quit on the team. So there's speculation enough to go around on Poles too, but overall i think he's done well. But in general, I dont see brilliant coaching by Eberflus. I see a roster getting better and the players doing it. Now this may well be an endorsement of the position coaches, but given all the strategic errors that Flus has made, I dont think he is a difference maker to the plus side - not enough to be retained. And like Ive said before, its not like he doesnt know what hes doing. He has shown competence, he is a professional, not a guy off the street, but in this league i think youre looking for that rare genius that increases your chances to win. They are hard to impossible to find, but I think you gotta keep trying. I think the main difference of opinion on this hinges on whether you're thinking about what's fair or nice to Eberflus, or whether you are laser focused on building a dominant winner. If Flus is a 7 out of 10 for example (not saying he is, just hypothetically) then is it fair to him to fire him? Probably not. Does he "deserve" another chance? Sure. But if you're looking for a 10 out of 10 to lead your team for a decade, then you gotta be willing to throw a 7/10 back into the water and fish again. yes the next one might be a 6, but until you have a 10 (or at least a 9!) you gotta keep trying. So to me, it's not about fairness or loyalty to Eberflus of Fields or anyone, but about a quest for excellent where competence and decent dont cut it? The counter argument to what Im saying is that a player may still be improving. That's a tough bet, and one that you gotta evaluate all the time in the NFL, and it's tough. But a coach? By the time they get to be a head coach, they should be pretty much fully cooked. It's not like making decisions like going for it on 4th down, or calling timeouts, or getting too conservative in the 4th quarter are new ideas that the coach is just learning. Theyve been in the league a while and watched all of this. If we the fans know this stuff, a head coach ought not to have to be learning on the job. So the argument to stick with Fields because he is still growing is one I dont agree with, but it is a valid argument. But I dont think its one that really applies to head coaches?

I suppose the counter argument would be that Poles drafted and acquired so many players of good moral character that the locker room stays tight, no matter who the coach is? Or look at it in the converse - if we'd taken Jalen Carter (and players like him) would they have quit on Eberflus?

I wonder where Dexter will end up in terms of being an impact player. He may have developed and learned the most of any rookie this year. Remember how slow he was off the ball? it was a real concern. And then by about week 7 he was as fast as anyone on the line. Hes a physical beast too, and the pressure anjd sacks are starting to come now too. But all that said, we do at the very least need a rotational 3T to take Jones place in the next year or so? And if that player turns out to be dominant, and pushes Dexter back to 2nd string, that will only be a bonus. All this to say that 3T is a need, but i dunno if I have it as the #1 need?

please just let it END. please.

and yet I begged you over and over to stop fighting with me, to stop speaking to or about me, and you kept "rattling my cage" i think you described it yourself. yes, your constant years long condescension, sarcasm and personal jibes have been passive aggressive, and under the radar and constant for years, and yes after asking, then demanding that you stop and you didnt, I blew it up until it was so unpleasant that admins had to ask us BOTH to stop - my purpose exactly. So just stop. We dont need to prove anything else. We just need to stop the whole discussion about all of it. Thats ALL Ive wanted this whole time. With each increasingly unpleasant volley I included that you could end it all if you just STOP. So just STOP.

even more awesome. Tell us what you see!

is it open to the public? thats awesome.

and how many of those came on hero ball plays? Fields is the best at that. I'd feel much better about his future and the comparisons to Brees etc. if his stats were coming in the normal course of the intention of the plays. Then it'd just be about getting better, not having to learn a whole new skill that is central to being an NFL QB?

yeah, I sent you a PM, Im not trying to keep it alive here on the board. All i wanted was for it to stop, and then we can all just talk about the Bears.

very cool - also Adam I wrote you a PM...

To me, the thing about Fields is that it's not just his stats that need to progress, but the specific skill of throwing the ball to the right receiver in context of your progressions in the intended timing of the play. I don't see him doing that much at all for plays that have reads. So he can throw for more and more yards on broken plays, and forced reads like screens, but that isnt progress in terms of the main skill for a QB. I don't think that Brees had that problem, he just needed to get better in general at a skill he was already showing, Fields needs to acquire that primary QB skill, and really hasnt. To be clear, Fields may be the best broken play QB of all time. And it is a valid opinion, even though I don't share it, that that style could win playoff games. But I'm not seeing much development in the area I'm concerned about, so stats alone don't really tell the story, and the 4th year development of other QBs don't really set a pattern here either, since they didn't have that problem, they were just increasing overall, and not relying on hero ball needing to learn how to play QB?

That's very cool info.

Thanks so much for this. I'll just say this one more time, since it seems to be lost in the noise. Anyone can disagree with me about anything - doesnt make you dumb, not in my eyes. This wasnt about disagreeing. It was about a years long pattern of personal attacks and slights. And they built up and built up, and i asked him to stop, and then i warned him to stop, and then i escalated until someone had to say something to both of us so that he would stop. I realize none of the rest of you saw it. i get that. But i promise you, if you went thru it, youd find your limit and finally say something too. But no, it has nothing to do with disagreeing about Justin Fields or anything like that - it only has to do with being disrespectful and personal. And like i said, for the first hundred times, i didnt even say anything. And then i think he got emboldened, and wanted to see how far he could push me. The other day, I was sending a PM to someone and I saw another PM message about him and his slights from 2020 - so it went on for at least 3 years, and you know you didnt hear anything about it from me for at least 3 years. This wasnt a quick reaction. Of course I have my ideas about Justin and all that, we all do, but that had zero to do with this. And for example, I'm not getting pissed off about this killa, you havent been poking me hundreds of times for years - this is just natural give and take, and that's all good. I hope people understand, but if they dont its OK, I just wasnt gonna sit around and take it anymore, and neither would anyone else here.

Ill tell ya what. Ill stop posting about the Bears here, and just post about your sex tourist molester ass. How about that you piece of shit? Does everyone really want to read all this every day all the time? How about for THREE YEARS? At what point would ANY of you have had enough? Maybe Ill be booted, or maybe someone will tell you to just stop. I wonder you little pussy. Someone somewhere needs to kick your ass.

F*ck you

God DAMN youre an idiot. Is there not a single one of you to tell this guy to stop?

again your lack of reading comprehension is astounding. I am not mad about something that happened three years ago - I am sick of your little digs that have been constant for over three years. They are unacceptable. I had hoped by underlining them so hard youd be shamed into stopping. But no, youre too stupid to even know when youve gone too far. Also in the category of how f*cking stupid you are - I have never been offended when anyone ever disagreed with an opinion of mine. They are opinions. Everyone has them - this is not a new concept to me, again especially having worked in a creative job for decades, its ALL opinions. Obviously. I am not upset if someone disagrees with me about whether to keep Fields or not. That's ridiculous. But there are facts as we go. The plays I diagrammed for example. In those plays Fields didnt make his read. Thats not an opinion. But again, even if you think facts arent facts, thats just your stupidity. It doesnt provoke a reaction. What I am done with is the fighting. The personal little asides. Your continued fighty attitude. I have had enough of it. I told you , then i warned you. Each time you doubled down, so then I went after you in hopes that finally other might say "OK you two settle down" and then the next time you did it, people other than me would tell you to stop. Instead, people want to f*ck with me now. Fine. Like i said, Im done. I only came back here so no one was mistaken thinking I am mad about some single slight from three years ago. Its not a single slight, its literally hundreds of them. Unacceptable, and like i said, Im gone.

you can be pro or anti Fields and still understand that 81% positive also means 19% negative in a class. And you know this. So youre trolling me. You also know (I HOPE) that 81% refers to the #1 pick QBs ONLY, and not #11. I have been debating whether higher picks generally net better players for over a week here now. It's CRAZY. I dont even really believe most people think that they're just trolling. I mean what's next? That heavy things are easier to carry than light ones? Where the hell am I? It's either the dumbest people in the world, or it's trolling. So Im left with what? Im dumb because people can fool me by pretending to be dumb (trolling) in between times they are actually dumb? And Im supposed to what? react with politeness like its not dumb and explain it again? so Im dumb because i dont want to call it out as trolling, and instead give the benefit of the doubt? or prove that Im not dumb by being rude and calling it dumb trolling? and then Im the fighty guy - which is something people would like to think of me right now because i finally had enough from Stinger whos been a little bitch to me for literally years? I found a private message between me and another member from 2020 discussing his tone with me. This was back when I WASNT responding to it, and being polite and just letting go. I did that for a long long time, as any confident adult would. But Im telling you no one on this board would put up with what hes done, and I realize none of you noticed it or saw it, so you think Im just overreacting now. So whats left? Fight and prove Im a dick? Dont fight and cower for acceptance? All thats left if I want to keep my self respect is to check out, and I hate that because I have loved the discussions here, but Im not loving them anymore. I cant believe it is a debate about higher picks being more likely to net successful players. If you actually think thats wrong youre a moron of epic proportions, and if you dont think that and just want to prove that you can make me respond politely and try to explain it AGAIN as some sort of evidence Im dumb and easy to fool, then youre just abusing my respect. So, i think Im done for a while. Not because Im mad, but because its unpleasant, and I dont WANT to fight. Its hard enough to simply debate the realities here. But this is just stupid. Stinger is still a giant dick. The rest of this is just juvenile and Im not even trying to push back because thats not who I am, despite what you saw when I gave Stinger what he deserved. But if your instinct, when you see someone finally push back against a bully, is to jump on them and try to tease them yourself, then you must think Im weak and want your turn. And If Im not weak at all, and youve fully miscalculated me and my personality, then I have two choices. Fight with you too, which I simply wont do, because I am an adult man who can actually control himself, despite your wrong interpretation of my response to Stinger, or i can withdraw. So, Im out, at least for several weeks. Well see if i can find another board thats less fighty. Probably not on the internet. Thats why I used to like this place. But whatever the outcome, Im sure as hell not gonna stick around with people who are disrespectful. I'll add this. Im 58 years old. Ive raised happy confident successful children, I had an extremely successful creative career at the highest tiers of the music business in NYC. It was ridiculously competitive, and I ran up against more than a few lawyers for giant media conglomerates and mafia figures in my time. I managed to hold my own and get paid by them, even when they wanted to BS me. None of them, no matter how threatening or combative they were ever disrespected me like that. They knew who I was as a man. And in the end I got paid. Why Id hang around here, no matter how much Ive enjoyed it, and sell all that out makes no sense to me at all. So Im out, and Im sure as f*ck not gonna explain how first round players are better than 3rd round players on average again. i dont even know why I would ever speak to anyone who was that stupid. And when they say "well thats your opinion" and try to make it as if Im so arrogant that I think my opinions are facts - I cant even begin to know how to respond to that. 2 + 2 = 4. If you dont get that, thats on you. And that doesnt make me arrogant. If anyone with half a brain reads what I wrote, theyd see I am always leaving caveats for my opinion, and that I could be wrong and cant predict the future. And if youre offended that I said half a brain, but you still cant tell the difference, than Im sorry if you feel I have revealed some level of your stupidity, but it aint my fault if someone is dumb and cant figure out the difference. But youre not dumb, you know the difference, you're just poking at me. In fact you know my character too since I private messaged you to make sure you knew i wasnt talking about YOU when in one exchange you werent sure. That was me showing you respect. Remember? And sticking around to battle that out sounds like no fun at all. The timing of this was really poor on your part. So i dunno when Ill be back, but my advice to the rest of you is to try to respect each other more here - cuz thats what made this place so great. And to Stinger, you're an assh*le for causing all of this. After all these years, I dont think you have any idea how much I'd love to show you who youve been taunting. I swear, in person, energy to energy, you'd never say any of it. You have no idea how many CEOs, stars and powerbrokers I have interfaced with, or the mutual respect that our energies found. They knew my implicit "rank" - they let me lead them. Not in contention but in TRUST. Im not saying that makes my opinions about the Bears any more worthy than anyone else's - but it does mean Stinger wouldnt have spoken to my face like that. Never in a million years. Hed know his place just by the energy. Like when two successful confident men meet - they never pull that crap on each other. And if the rest of you didnt like how I handled him, and want your turn to shut me up, well, youre not gonna get it. Because that holds no interest whatsoever for me. Id rather respect you all and debate like men who respect each other. And if thats not on the table anymore, then there is nothing left for me here. And I admit I am very sad about it. But not enough to play submissive bitch games.

Ok, i get it. Whatever, I wont bother posting here for a while. I dunno why everyone is being such an asshole, but whatever you need to do. Too bad too, because I have really enjoyed this place in the past.

This place is a hall of mirrors. I cant keep repeating. I agree with what DABEARS wrote above. I have said the same 5 things at least a billion times already. if you're trolling, I'm too polite to assume that. If you're really not sure, then I dont mean to be insulting by suggesting you're trolling. This board used to be fun.

Totally. I may change my mind as I do research in February etc, but right now, Williams does not look like the answer to me either.

Well I almost always agree. I always prefer watching film to parsing stats, Often the stats are misleading, especially out of context. In this case Im just saying that the higher the draft pick, the better the chance that the player will be good. And that's self evident like I said. The 30 year Harvard study from 2011 said this: 81% of #1 pick QBs are elite 39% of first round QB picks are elite 22% of first round QB picks are middle 39% of first round QB picks are busts 21% of second round QB picks are elite 6% of third round QB picks are elite Of the list Adam compiled of the best 16 (was it 18?) or so QBs in the league right now, 75% were top 10 draft picks. So we know there is risk in any pick, but we also know clearly that the higher the pick, the lesser the risk. You cannot use stats alone to predict a player or to even understand their performances out of context. But you CAN use stats to talk about commodities like draft picks, which are not individual examples, which can be outliers to any statistic, but instead a collection of picks over many years. And the point about gym class, was that each person picking players always picks the players they think are best. The more people (who have their own ideas of who will be good) pick, the fewer likely hidden gems there will be. Yes, there are hidden gems, but no you cannot look for them on purpose, because you dont know they will be outliers. If you did, you would have already picked them earlier. If for example anyone thought Brady would be who he turned out to be, even if EVERY OTHER team missed it, then that team would have taken him in the first round! ANyone would! So the fact that you can sometimes find a hidden gem BY ACCIDENT is no STRATEGY for finding quality starters at the QB position. That's all facts - no opinion included.