Jump to content

BearFan PHX

Super Fans
  • Posts

    7,537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BearFan PHX

  1. honestly, we could draft ANY position at 10 and I wouldnt be shocked (other than QB) we really are in a BPA position. And McMIllan is widely mocked to likely go before we pick anyway.
  2. fair enough - I wasnt looking to disagree, just wondering why. After watching tape I totally soured on Campbell, and Banks looked better to me. ANd like you, Im looking for more data, which is why I asked
  3. It's good that we are looking at all sorts of positions. It means our roster is pretty solid, it means we wont have to reach for a position, and it means other teams dont know what we will do either. We are in good shape heading into the draft. Those two second rounders are going to bear fruit too. They could go anywhere.
  4. I'm just saying, he's not a deep threat. Usually when people talk about a WR1, they are talking about someone that plays the X position? McMillan is a really good possession receiver, and he could really help us. So I dont think the question is whether he would be good to add to the team or not, that's a no brainer easy YES. The question is whether there is another player who could help more. And Im also saying, let's not make that choice based on positional need, but solely on the ability of the available players. Best player available other than QB or RT.
  5. You know, here's the thing. Poles has done such a good job filling holes on our roster, that its not really clear WHO we might take. We can use help in a lot of areas, and we dont NEED help much anywhere from a rookie starter. OL - we could use a stud LT, and developmental players inside. The only one we cant use is a RT. WR - we could definitely use another good one TE - Kmet is OK, but I dont think anyone is scared of him. A real stud here could push him out after this year. HB - Same thing. We dont have a true stud here. QB - we are set. so on offense, the only thing we truly dont need to draft is QB or RT DL - you can always use more. We dont have a game wrecking top 5 Edge rusher, or DT. Grady is older. We can always use top talent here. LB - if you draft a young fast guy that Allen likes, you can save a TON of cap room letting Edmunds go after this year. Maybe Edmunds will make himself indispensable this year, but we could use a young LB stud going forward. S - Byard is getting older and Brisker has concussion problems. There are two excellent hard hitting SS in this draft. Either could help us. CB - Stevenson will probably be OK, but you can never have too many. Basically, we dont have many glaring holes where a rookie NEEDS to come in and start, but we could use a stud rookie at almost any position. We are in a place to truly look best player available, regardless of positional need. And with a new coach, honestly NO ONE knows what we will do. Other teams cant really predict us this year, and so I think us trying to do that is foolish too. Now it's totally cool to say who you think we OUGHT to draft - which players are best and could help us - but making the case that we need (or dont need) a certain position is really hard to say. *IF* you believe one of the LTs is a true stud, I think that would be the clearest positional need. But Im not sold that any are, so its impossible to say based on positional need what we might do - it's more a matter of player evaluation. We can all have our opinions, but I dont think you can say _______ is good, but we dont need an _________, unless its a QB or a RT. Every other position is a possibility IF you think the player is that good. For example, we might take a Safety at 10. People would be shocked, say it was a little too early etc, and Im not predicting it, but its a possibility like so many others. And if you think they are the best impact player on the board, and youd be happy with them at #14 or something, you can take em if you cant trade down.
  6. I dont see McMillan as a WR1 type. Hes not quite fast enough. but he's 6' 5" and runs between 4.46 and 4.55 - hes a possession receiver, a slot guy. Like Keenan but not the same exact style. hes like a WR/TE - great red zone target, great working across the middle. But not a deep threat. Like a faster TE split out. Like a Power Forward in basketball. He would help get Odunze and Moore open. Put him underneath in a high/low and SOMEONE is open. Johnson could use him as a chess piece for sure. And he could have a role similar to Laporta's. Kmet would still be inline to block, or release, and the nickel would have to fight McMillan's huge body. Too fast for a LB, and too big for a nickel or safety, and that would mean Kmet would have an even better matchup too. 11 personnel with Moore, Odunze, McMillan, Kmet and whoever the back is would cause a ton of problems for defenses. And we really do need a real 3rd WR. And again, I am just describing how McMillan could really help us, not arguing that he is a better choice than a DT, or an OT etc. But he would be a good choice for sure. If hes even still there at 10.
  7. maybe we need to draft a DT instead so we can grow some sacks
  8. The best argument against taking McMillan would be simply to say another player who is a better choice. McMillan will be good for whoever drafts him, if we could get him without spending a pick, we'd be lucky to have him! But maybe there is another player who can help us even more, and that's a perfectly good argument.
  9. It sounds like you're saying you want fewer weapons so that the two guys on the team will do better? I think that's backwards thinking. The idea is to win games. The more weapons the better. Let's say DJ and Odunze are good for 2200 yards together, and lets say Kmet adds another 800. If Caleb throws for 4,000 yards that means there are still 1,000 yards to throw around. Having another real target makes everyone more open, and there are still plenty of yards for everyone? And if Caleb throws for 4,000 yards and Odunze or DJ only gets 900, and we win a lot of games, thats not so bad either!
  10. I put McMillan on a list of players Id love to see in a Bears uniform along with Jeanty, Kelvin Banks Jr, Colestand Loveland and some DT that I havent decided which one(s) yet. Some others, like TE Loveland, OG Booker and the two SSs Starks and Emmanwori would be too early at 10, so maybe a trade down to get there. If one was available at the top of round 2, that'd be a steal. But I am in no position to pick a single name right now as the best choice. I can rule some guys out that I dont like, and I can say some guys that i do like, but I cant say who the pick should be if i was making it yet. I still need to learn the DTs better. But if we ended up with McMillan, sure, I'd be happy.
  11. you said it would slow Odunze's development, Im saying it wont because they play different positions. Itd be like saying taking a TE would slow Odunze's development, or taking a pass catching RB etc. It'd be similar to having Keenan Allen out there. He didnt slow Odunze's development. In fact, having another player for the defense to have to watch out for would help Odunze? Im not saying mcMillan should be the pick, but I am saying he is an option, just like Jeanty is.
  12. McMillan plays the slot though, so it's not the same position. Hes kind of like a Sam LaPorta, but split out rather than TE, so i could see it. I also think Membou is moving up boards because of his combine numbers, but his film doesnt match it.
  13. I wish there was a LT that was a no-brainer in this draft, but there isnt. Banks is my favorite, and I feel like 10 is a little early for him. McMillan doesnt get a lot of love, but hed be a great addition to the offense...
  14. good point, but I was really excited about Will Campbell based on his highlight reel, and then you destroyed him with two LSU QB highlight reels LOL Ive never seen one player look so consistently bad on a teammate's highlight reel that he stuck out like that! But yes, the highlight reels do give you a sense of what they do well, so you can look for those traits and consistency in game film. And to your point - if the highlight reels dont pop, then no need to look further. I havent really seen too much yet from any of the Defensive linemen. I am able to disqualify SOME of the DEs for being too light for Allen, but some others I really need to study. What if someone falls to us? Like Mason Graham. I know its not gonna happen, but I need to see the film. Im also wondering whether we might package one of our 2nds to get back up into the late first round for someone. So I need to keep watching that film past the 10th pick too. In a draft where the talent drops off arouns 10 or 15 and then levels out for a while, a trade up seems unlikely, but if we take Kelvin Banks for example, maybe a trade up for one of the remaining DTs makes sense? Again, I gotta see the film and see where i think the tiers of talent are.
  15. I'll check the highlights, but im also gonna find some endzone cam of complete games, hopefully against good competition. But thank you for these, the highlight reels are a good place to start.
  16. Thank you AZ, Ill see if I can find some film on them!
  17. Generically, in terms of position, Id like a LT, but Im not sure any are worth the 10th pick. I like Banks the best, but he isnt as sure a thing as Wright was for example. In terms of talent level, I like McMillan a lot. Is there a true stud DL out there that isnt set to go top 5?
  18. Thanks for the this. I was discounting the 260 players as too small, but maybe 260 is the cutoff
  19. I have him as the only LT I believe in in this draft. And Im not even that sold on him. He doesnt seem to be worth the #10 pick, but who is? Id probably end up taking him at 10 if he was there, and I couldnt get a trade down. I like McMillan too. But we need a LT.
  20. Here are four 2 round Mocks on DraftBuzz with no trades. In all four, i got S Nick Emmanwori in the second round. A good replacement for Brisker. In 2 of them I got HB Ashton Jeanty at 10, paired with either TE Coleston Loveland or G Tyler Booker In the other 2, I got HB Omarion Hampton in the 2nd round, paired with either OT Kelvin Banks Jr or WR Tetairoa McMillan with the #10 pick I have a hard time believing the talent that was still available in the 2nd round in this mock, but I would be thrilled with any of these drafts if they happened.
  21. serious question, was Johnson wrong to draft Gibbs at #12 in 2023?
  22. you gotta look at the guy tho - Banks Jr, sure. Some like Cambpell, i dont, but I could get that. But Membou? Hes a RT who will probably play guard and is short for each.
  23. At impact positions, arbitrary projections from NFL.com Mock draft: We are obviously not picking a QB at 10 At Edge, The big name ends are not as heavy as Allen likes. Abdul Carter (proj 4th) is 250 pounds Ezeiruaku (proj 15th) is 248 pounds Williams (proj 23rd) is 260 pounds Tuimoloau (proj 29th) is 265 pounds compare to Odeyingbo at 286 pounds These are all lighter faster guys, and so I think you can rule them out at 10. LT (or OL) would make sense, but... Campbell has real flaws to me (plays too high, gets beat inside too much AND not wide enough when protecting outside, where shorter arms dont help) Seriously, thats the trifecta: too high, vulnerable to the outside, vulnerable to the inside. no way to me Banks could be the pick. but admit it: you're not jumping up and down about it. The rest: Booker (proj 17th) is a guard, I dunno if we're spending the 10th pick on any guard, and we just paid three interior players big money. talent in the pipeline is good, but to take Booker at 10 and then have him sit feels like a weird move. Still he is a good player, so he can go on the also ran list. Membou (proj 19th) Plays RT, but probably should be a Guard. Good technique, but undersized AND lacks killer instinct. Surely not a LT, and maybe not even a RT. I cant see him at 10. If I was gonna take a guard, it'd be Booker before Membou Simmons (proj 20th) at least he is an actual LT. He is a good physical specimen, but he makes a lot of mental errors, especially in reacting stunts. Plus he's coming off an injury. He might grow to become a good OL, but he has a way to go AND hes coming off an injury. I cant see him at 10 at all Savaiinaea (proj 28) is a project at guard. not even a mid first round pick. Conerly (proj 32) needs to add strength. He is a developmental player with good upside after a year in the weight room. We know the offensive skill players are WR Travis Hunter will be long gone before we pick HB Ashton Jeanty (proj 6) TE Warren (proj 9) Jeremy Shockey comp, big, tough rumbling, may not be able to beat man coverages in the NFL. Gets manhandled more than you want for a physical type with no real vertical threat. Honestly Kmet is better at this. I dont think he is a Johnson fit TE Loveland (proj 16) More of a power forward giant receiver than a pure bruiser. 6' 6" 248 makes him a monster in the slot, not unlike Sam Laporta did for Johnson in Detroit. I think this is the kind of mismatch player that Johnson covets. If you cover him with a LB, he's open, if you use a DB, he will use his height and strength, or you run the ball. WR McMillan (proj 12th) big target, can work the middle and provide a similar benefit as Loveland, but he has the speed to challenge deep too, so if Johnson wants to make his LaPorta a tall slot receiver instead of a TE, McMillian could fit the bill. Hes got great hands - a possession receiver at 6' 5" runs a 4.5 40, wins contested catches so more of a physical threat We have no need at LB and no MLB superstars are available. At S, there is only Malakai Starks (proj 22) to consider. He's a hard hitter, great against the run. Can play S or Nickel. Gets caught on breaks in man coverage sometimes. Maybe a replacement for Brisker. A great toy for Allen? honorable mention to Nick Emmanwori (proj 55) - another big physical safety who has some zone coverage issues but has tremendous size and speed to match up with TEs, and come down into the box against the run I will leave CBs and DTs unexplored, because I havent really done any work on them yet. So first round pick players I would be happy to see in a Bears uniform are: OT Kelvin Banks Jr OG Tyler Booker HB Ashton Jeanty TE Colston Loveland WR Tetairoa McMillan S Malakai Starks S Nick Emmanwori (I have a first round grade on him, if we get him in the 2nd round, Ill be thrilled) WR Travis Hunter (and CBs and DTs I havent scouted yet) I think Banks Jr, Jeanty, Loveland or McMillan are most likely at #10 if we dont trade down and will be the pick unless a CB or DT I havent scouted yet makes the grade. Don't sleep on Loveland or McMillan! They are auditioning for very similar roles, and we need that kind of player.
×
×
  • Create New...