BearFan PHX

this is ridiculous and twisting to keep a dead narrative alive. Caleb didnt do his physicals for anyone. He didnt blow the Bears off. The Bears wanted something special and Caleb said no, well do it regularly after my pro day. But the idea that Caleb not giving medicals is why Justin didnt get more value? That's nonsense. Poles needed the medical but then traded Fields anyway before the medical? That whole narrativer already was proven false today. Also, Tomlin has told Fields that he is not the starter, and it's not an open competition. And worst of all hes not gonna pick Caleb to avoid a circus - hes going to pick Caleb because hes the best damned QB thats been available in a long time. This isnt all intrigue and smokescreens and double crosses - it was always simple. Justin sucks and the NFL knows it and Caleb is great and the NFL knows it. That's all there is to it. The other scenarios died today. It was always just Justin sucks Caleb rocks.

For sure. Caleb is the best chance this franchise has had to be dominant in a long time. Let's go.

It's not a big deal to me either way, but just for the discussion, apparently Tomlin called Fields and told him his role was as a backup to Wilson for sure. According to one of the big reporter, but I don't remember which one said it. I'll try to find it. I want to say it was Adam Schefter, but I'm not really sure.

yeah I don't know what Poles will do, but what he SHOULD do is take Caleb Williams.

when he takes the Bears to greatness, will you recant this statement?

after saying "there are a handful of things that would scare the shit out of me" he says "I dont know if they are true" which i think is important for context LOL

I think our roster is getting stocked, and it's time to add blue chippers. WR, Bowers, OT or DL with pick #9. We've filled a bunch of holes with stopgaps., and one of those positions is gonna get a big upgrade.

I think Poles is doing pretty good and will do the right thing here. We are in a really good position.

Please God no.

Obviously Poles felt that clearing out a QB controversy was worth losing that 3rd rounder. As for Poles speaking at the combine ruining the value, that only matters if there is only one team interested. If two teams saw him as a starter, theyd have to bid with each other and then true value is established regardless of Poles' comment?

Bagent is a better backup.

I gotta say it, and I wont harp on it I will say it once. The league has spoken and Fields is not a starter. Teams chose Kirk Cousins, Russell Wilson, even Jayden Daniels and Drake Maye over Justin. His value was a 2025 6th rounder, which is worth a 7th rounder this year - basically nothing. I can imagine that Poles may have passed on a slightly better deal, but there was no 2nd round pick out thereto be had, no less a first rounder, and Poles has known he was taking Williams (barring something unexpected in his medical) and he didn't need to finish with Williams to trade Justin. And this is deeply true because he hardly got anything for him, so whatever insurance you think Justin may have provided, Poles was willing to forgo it for almost nothing. He got a few million off the cap, and cleared out the locker room for the next guy. I don't think Poles did the wrong thing or even screwed up. I think his idea of Justin's value was more in line with reality than what a lot of fans thought it was. And the league agreed in unison in the loudest terms. Justin lacks something necessary to succeed in the NFL, and without that skill set, all his incredible plusses don't matter. It's exactly what I've been saying since October. I took a LOT of crap for being early to see this. First I was told I needed to let the rest of the season play out before I could proclaim that what was already clear on tape could be true. Then the goalposts moved and I had to wait until the draft to see etc etc. Well, it was just true. It was on the tape. It wasn't that I had a bad attitude or was a hater. It was just that I could see that Justin had fatal flaws, and I said so. And. I. Was. Right. So to all the people who thought it was ego, or how could I possibly know or whatever the basis of all the crap I have taken for these six months - at the end of the day the NFL and Poles agreed with me, and Fields is what I (and they) say he was. It would be nice, but not expected, if the people who were questioning my fandom, football knowledge and character would admit that I wasn't wishy washy about it. I didn't leave myself any escape hatches in case things went another way. I was 100% convicted in what I saw as the clear obvious objective truth, and in the end, I was correct. What I saw was real, and not the product of my ego or negativity. Or anything about me at all. It was just the tape. That's all it was. And that's all it's ever been. And it wasn't because I think I am better than anyone, because anyone else could have joined me in this opinion and been right along side of me. Many here did. Because they believed it themselves, certainly not because I did. If I was an overly negative person, you'd have heard me complaining about some of our other players, or the new signings. In the fall you'd hear me being overly critical of Williams and negative. But you won't. I am optimistic and excited about Williams, and I will give him the same patience and hope I gave Fields for several years. I was very excited when Fields was drafted. I believed in him. And I admit that Fields came into a tough situation. It was a real obstacle to his growth in many different ways. Not fair to him at all. But if that narrative captured the entirety of the problem, then we would have had better offers, and Fields would be a starter somewhere. I truly wish him well. He was a good guy, a leader, an electrifying athlete and extremely likeable as a person. But he is not a good NFL QB, and he's been decoded and never will be a consistent winning starter in this league. I will also say that being SO right about this one thing isn't because I think I have some super football brain. It doesn't mean I think I can make guesses like this all over the place and be sure I'm right. Usually things are much murkier to me. It was simply that what I saw on tape from Justin was so clear that I knew for SURE about this one thing.

I absolutely never speak in absolutes! Also, I think there's a decent chance we make picks at #1 and #9

you could well be right.

lol

yeah they will have about $27 million left after they get down to the top 51 for the cap, but that includes money they will need for the rookie pool, and to keep liquidity for in season moves. we have room for another signing tho. Also there is some chance we will extend Allen another year and play some cap games doing it to free up $. If that happens itll probably be this weekend.

and if I said i thought it was pretty much already decided but if they are surprised by something bad then it could change, thatd pretty much be the same thing?

true I think he probably knows what he thinks already, and is just doing his due diligence. Of course if bad stuff pops up, it can always change things. But assuming it doesnt, they probably know what theyre doing already. true, but I think Williams is the obvious choice, not predicting Poles but from what I've seen on film.

so if you think you are proving youre better off not picking a QB #1 then you have to factor in all the QBs that werent selected #1 who DIDNT win superbowls. No one knows its Brady and waits until the 6th round for him, and you can pick 6th round QBs every year for the next 10 years and not get another Brady. So no one is saying picking someone #1 makes them a superbowl winner, but a higher percentage of #1 pick overall QBs win superbowls than any other place in the draft.

it was me that said it. if we could get something good for him, we ought to consider it with Swift now our starter and Roschon Johnson coming on too. Not saying Herbert isnt good - in fact thats the reason i think he has trade value.

the thing is youve used the raw statistics improperly becazuse you only proved that every non #1 QB together, one of them would win a SB more often, but you dont get to draft them ALL, you gotta pick one, and thats where the #1 pick is a better bet than any individual lower pick QB. again, a coin flip is a better bet than having to roll a six on a dice. And yet if you did both once, 1 out of 12 times, youd lose the coin flip but win the dice roll. that doesnt mean that half the time you wouldnt win the coin flip and only win the dice one out of six times. I didnt have an opinion on Stroud vs Young. I wasnt scouting QBs that year. But a single outcome doesnt mean the odds arent still what they are. And the goat is hilarious by the way!

Here's a good article https://www.foxsports.com/stories/nfl/where-great-nfl-qbs-are-picked-analyzing-54-years-of-history-by-draft-position

1) true, and that doesnt mean Fields is good either. It's a good reason why the record has been what it is, but Fields hasnt show that he has grown in his weaknesses since college 2) same as #1 3) he did, with a team full of future NFL players against college defenses. Williams scored more points though. He had a bad defense and lost games, but he had no future 3rd round or better picks around him. Also, Caleb's college stats are pretty similar to Justins. 4) same as #3 5) thats not even an argument. If Williams is a future superbowl winner and Fields sucks (hypothetically) then you'd keep the bad player because the good one had a higher price?

which game did you watch? Was it all 22 film? Because I routinely see Williams reading defenses and getting the ball out fast to the right WRs with anticipation and location that gives the WRs opportunities for yards after the catch. I've seen many dozens of examples with my own eyes?

this isnt fancy vernacular, its just the words you have to use to describe who the argument youre making, which is a mathematical one is mistaken