BearFan PHX

I think this is just writers speculating because the Bears brought him in for a 30 visit. Maybe they really are interested, I dont know, but i dont think these articles have any inside info, just connecting dots we already knew. If the Bears have too much money invested in Kmet right now to take on another TE1, they might well be meeting him because he would be an excellent trade or free agency target in the future, so good to make connections and start the book on him now? No matter what, Odunze and Bowers are both big time talents, and someone will take them each early. And each of them would look great in a Bears uniform.

Last year, Skoronski was the pick at 9, and he is a guard, and not even close in talent to Larry Allen. I do agree with you that Fuaga looks like a monster OG in the making. I also saw that you never said to take him at 9, Id be comfortable with him at a slightly lower position, and I think you would too. That said, there are other players I might take first who are grouped in similar value, but if I could add Fuaga as an OG to this roster, it would be a big win for sure. I feel like Jenkins is on the trading block too, so that might make this more likely to happen.

LOL not at nine, but maybe at 18?

yeah I agree - i just dont think the DEs are the right fit for us. Verse is probably the best one for us (I worry about Latu's injuries), but no one is mocking him to go in the top 6, so hes not a sure fire blue chipper. And if we pick at 9 we need one,l otherwise, you trade down because there are a bunch of good 1b guys.

and pay Moore too! Of course the same logic works to have a rookie DE across from Sweat. In important positions, a top ranked vet paired with a high picked player on a rookie deal is the way to go. But you need to be sure youre getting a real stud and not just drafting a position?

If Nabers is there, Poles will actually move faster than the speed of light to pick him. I think the mock machines arent really as cutthroat as the real teams are. I dont see him falling to 9, but that would be great. Im more worried that only 3 QBs go before we pick. I see the 1b list, but I think Williams, at least 2 WRs and Alt are the only sure fire pro bowlers, the rest are 1b, worthy of a first half of the first round pick, but not a top 5. For example, if any od the DEs were that clear cut, wed be seeing them go in the top 4. In this draft many times the first defensive player off the board is at 9, so there are blue chippers, and then there are blue chippers.

its true if you only look this year, but if you look for the next 2-3 years, WR is going to matter too, and if you think you have a shot at one of a certain quality that you wont get a chance at again, except in free agency, and youre about to pay Moore too. I think WR is definitely a need, even if not this year? But I also agree with the idea that we need a C, we need at least one young G and we probably need a new LT, and we need another pass rusher and maybe a 3T as well. I think it's gonna matter more on the quality of the players available this year, and predictions on what will be deep or not next year. For example - who will have the better NFL career, Fashanu or Verse? Are either or both of them going to be pro bowl blue chippers? Im personally not sure at all. Trenches are extremely important. I just want to be sure the guy Im getting is a true blue chipper at #9, and other than Odunze, I'm not sure there's a clear answer for us as a for sure blue chip player. I think all of a sudden theres a group of about 8 tier 1b guys who would all help us, but none of which is a clear cut pro bowler. I like the idea of staying at #9 and grabbing an impact player, but when it theyre all off the board? Im not looking to trade down for the extra value, but I feel like the blue chippers are possibly gone by 9. Unless you move to interior offensive linemen like Fuaga at guard or Powers-Johnson at C. And you know what? This could also be a good argument for trading up to get MHJr, Alt or Nabers at 5 or 6 if they're available too.

and you dont want to have to trust them going forward. Its rich at #9, but a monster guard is a good thing to add to this OL. At some point we are going to need to replace Jenkins and Davis both. Getting a stud and making them compete for playing time is a great idea. If we could trade down a bit and still get him, that wouldnt suck. But Im not sure we dont need our future WR, OT or DE more.

I see Fuaga as a road grading guard in the NFL - another Jenkins type.

you can ask by position, but then you also have to ask if any of the DEs or available OTs or WRs are true studs. If you figure we finish the rebuild next year, then you gotta look for BPA at need, and that factors in with positional importance too, and I suppose who is available next year - is 2025 deep in WR, DE or OT?

well if theyd do it for that, then sure. I just think it's a way one sided deal in our favor. I agree about giving up the first rounder too, although it should be like pick #20 or something, and wed be getting a high 2nd rounder this year back. I was just trying to figure out what it would realistically take. Like you, I'm in no hurry to lose that first rounder.

Allen is short term though. If he was 27, Id agree with you. If the Bears are all in on creating a modern offense for Caleb, Moore is gonna need a long term partner, best on a rookie deal. Also it gives the rookie a year to learn under Allen before the burden falls on him. OL and DL are very important too, so it may well go to one of those positions too, I think WR is definitely on the table. If you only look to this coming year, WR doesn't look like such a need, but if you look long term, I think having a shot at this kind of talent demands considering it.

nah, you're making sense. Im just saying that higher round is generally early for a punter unless they are a phenom. But I dont really disagree with what youve said here at all.

Ive heard that Odunze may have off field issues partying too hard issues. Then again, to my own point, Randy Moss fell to like 20 or something because he smoked marijuana. LOL Same with Warren Sapp. Thomas looks like a good fit for us, I agree. To me the nightmare scenario is if only three QBs go before us. Then we'd probably be looking at Thomas at #9 instead of a trade down. Also, given how excellent our draft position is, "nightmare scenario" is pretty funny. Call it worst case outcome. It's still pretty damned good.

for sure if our scouts are telling Poles that, and that's what he's seeing, then for sure. No reason to trade up. But *IF* you think he's the next coming, and head and shoulders above the others, if you think you've got Randy Moss here, I think you do it. Personally, I haven't seen enough film on them to know either way. I know they are all good.

I think the question would be, who else would take him first, and where. If you had a very good feeling his first other suitor would be in round 6, then you can wait until 5 to take him?

I think it would take more than next year's two to do it, but if it took next year's number one, straight up, it would be a good move, like picking him higher than our pick will be and getting him one year early. And it'd be too good of a deal for us, so Id expect wed have to throw in #9 this year too of course, and now next years first is a little rich, so we will take the chargers second this year to even it out. So we'd get #5 this year and the Charger's second rounder this year, for our #9 and next year's first? I might do that if I thought MHJr was going to be Randy Moss or his dad.

Good stuff, assuming Latu is medically ok

I think that's right, plus these interviews arent just for this year, but they go into the file for free agent and trade scenarios in a few years too.

I love that you're educated on some of the 3rd or 4th round guys. I dont know anything down there except I heard (and cant remember) the name of the OT from Yale LOL

I know what i think about QBs (lol) As for the rest, there are a few players I know I'd like to have: WR MHJr WR Nabers OT Alt Probably all gone by #9. After that I have a few that I think would be good, but I'm not 100% sure of: WR Odunze OT Fashanu DE Verse Great players that we probably dont need roster / scheme wise: TE Bowers DE Turner Then there are players I'd love to have, but might be or are too early to draft at #9: WR Thomas OC Powers-Johnson OG Fuaga Then those that we might take at #9 or later, that I haven't really scouted enough to be sure: DT Murphy DT Newton DE Latu (injuries?) I haven't scouted CBs, and I could have missed another OT that i just didnt see enough on film.

For sure, and don't be afraid to hold a contrary position to the "draft experts" a lot of them write about stats and narratives and don't really watch the film. If you watch a player yourself, and have an opinion as a result - it counts.

pretty good id say!

it's all good. I was really responding to Grizz's comments, not yours. I agree with about 95% of what you post, and the 5% where I might see it another way, I always find you reasonable and cool, so it's all good.

Listen, this is all starting to heat up again - I am not the most argumentative person on this board by far. When someone says that shit and chocolate are the same thing, it's OK for me to say it isn't. When they keep pressing the point it's ok for me to say they aren't much of a chef if they can't see the difference. This is beyond stupid now. Fields sucks, and Williams is the best prospect in years. And it's OK for me to not only say that, but to say that suggesting otherwise is stupid. Every opinion isnt a golden snowflake worthy of admiration. There ARE dumb ideas, and when i see them, Im gonna say so. Im sick to death of being called out because I dont massage some ego praising really dumb ideas. There are PLENTY of things in football etc that are not so obvious. I dont claim to be always right or have some deep ability to know everything - that's just nonsense being thrown at me by people who say dumb things and then want to make that my fault. Most things on this board are unknown to me and all of us. I routinely use words to moderate my opinion so it isnt perceived as absolutism. But I'm DONE being called out as a bully because people argue stupid things and then cant stand the heat when someone points out how stupid it is to equivocate Fields and Williams. And then to be upset months later that I used such a hurtful term as "inane" LOL really? Are we THAT fragile? GTFOutta here. If people need their opinions to be praised, then say smarter stuff.