AZ54

Just going off PFF grades Braxton out performed all rookie LT including first round picks. If he was picked higher would we be as quick to kick him to the curb? With so many holes to fill in this roster I don’t understand why replacing him should be one of our top priorities this off-season.

This. Modest WR and CB contracts might surprise some with their dollar amount but these are core players we need to keep if we think we’re going to compete in 2024 and really 2025.

I think Irsay is done with the retreads. Jets make more sense.

Fields has to improve as a passer but he it’s already good enough that combined with his elite scrambling ability that he is already affecting how defenses play.

That second part is a big factor in this because those stadium deals are very complex with a lot of stakeholders to manage. Just looking at his age his retirement would follow shortly after the stadium is done.

Gotta love it when the regional scouts check in. Though I'm not sure what Stinger is scouting in Thailand.

Orlando can play RT. Find a RT as backup and slide Brown to LT if needed.

In some aspects yes. I don’t think he’s better throwing deep, might be equivalent, and I don’t think he’s better throwing on the run. Stroud is pretty good when moving to his right not so sure about moving to his left. Stroud is better in short and intermediate. Fields has a lot of work to do on bubble screens and outlet passes.

Yep, he's ranked at the bottom and just for reference the 2 Bears WRs (Mooney and Claypool) in there are in the middle with Claypool ranked higher.

Every single "top" WR on that list has someone really good on the other side of the field, except one. Lockett-Metcalf, Aiyuk-Deebo/Kittle, Jefferson-Thielen, Brown-Davonte Smith, Diggs- ? If you filter that list for the Bills only Diggs is at the top and the others at the very bottom.

That's pretty good and without a 1st Rd pick.

Minimum 8 wins.

Poles was very clear in today's press conference that he still wants to be conservative with the contracts. However, I agree with others that he'd pay premium money for a premium player at a premium position.

Bingo

7 teams vying for 3 prospects still works for us, and all being in top 10. Actually it's even better as it increases the likelihood of DBDB's proposed double trade down. However, I think AZ is going to take a QB. They are not enamored with Murray's work ethic. There is a reason his new contract has stipulations about how many hours he has to be engaged on his "iPad" reviewing plays/game plans. I doubt they'd trade him this year unless the new guy wins the job outright, but more likely wait a year and then see who wins the job in year 2. Unless their new staff falls in love with one, with 3 good prospects they'll get one by staying put. Having this high of a pick and good QB prospects on the board, it would be foolish for their new GM not to take advantage of the opportunity and hedge his bet at QB. However, as the Bears have proven too often, there is always at least one fool in every draft. I believe Indy is our most likely trading partner. If the Cards select a QB then we have our entire draft board available for us at #4.

Don't worry there will be plenty of teams leaking positive vibes or "talking up" Levis and Richardson but their resumes don't come close to the top 2.

LMAO.... I see HC calls GM and tells him to prioritize getting some guys who can pass block.

When he reviews Fields performance Trent Dilfer often comments how unique Kmet is as a TE because he blocks well and runs routes well. He says he is not or never will be Kelce but as an all-around TE there aren't many as good as him. He's young enough that he should continue to improve and also has many prime years ahead of him. It is worth noting that ND TE Mayer is typically listed as a top 15, and sometimes top 10 pick. I think Kmet is similar athletically although Mayer seems to have a little better short area quickness and more agility to adjust to the ball. Kmet has the edge on blocking.

The run was impressive but I was even more impressed by his back shoulder catch where he adjusted to the ball very well. Not that it was anything special by NFL standards I just didn't think he had that ability. When you have a WR with his deep speed and DBs wanting to stay over the top that opens the door for more short receptions. Again he just has to be a viable receiving threat, which Cordarrelle Patterson never was, and he becomes a headache for defenses.

I don't think bringing back someone you fired is ever a good idea.

We can definitely splurge somewhere if we want. As far as a U TE I wonder if Claypool can fill that role. Engram 6'3". 240lbs, Claypool 6'4" 240lbs. We get caught sticking positions on players but in the end what do you need him to do that gives us the advantage against a defense? With a full offseason Claypool will be much better integrated into the entire offensive scheme. He'll never be an inline blocker handling a DE in pass protection but neither is Engram. Can Claypool crack down on the DE for an outside run? Plus he won't cost us $10mil.

Do you know where he ranks in blocking among TEs? I think that was his biggest improvement on the field this year and bodes well for his future as a TE who can be effective in all aspects of the offense.

Somewhat interested depending on the player but I really don't want aging players with high cap hit and their performance is already trending down. Or in Pittman's case an average good player who will need a new contract soon. Though they have different styles or strengths it's hard to see where Pittman adds much more than what we already have in Claypool and further he'd be on the same contract timeline which I don't like at all. I might take Alec Pierce as compensation instead of a late round pick. (This "negative" made me laugh from PIttman's draft profile: Wasn't guarded by Paulson Adebo (Stanford) or Jaylon Johnson (Utah)) DeForest Buckner is a good player but he's not worth the $20mil/yr we'd have to pay him. He could end up being a cap casualty (frees up all of his salary) as Indy overhauls the front office. If Eberflus and Poles like him it's better to just wait and see if he gets cut.

Doesn't this mean our coaching staff goes to the East West Shrine bowl? That used to be Senior Bowl but for some reason the NFL moved the affiliation over. Regardless this is a plus for day 2 and especially day 3 picks and maybe some UDFAs. https://shrinebowl.com/coach-selection/

Since the world knows we are not taking a QB then the QB slots drop to the 2nd and 3rd picks. That helps Seattle trade down if they are content with Geno but that can only happen if one of the top 2 QBs is still on the board. Seattle viewing Geno as the future QB is a little difficult for me to believe so I'm going to say they will be doing a lot of work on the draft QBs. Then you drop to AZ who has Kyler Murray but there are a lot of question marks surrounding his work ethic and future in the organization. The Cards with new GM/HC could easily draft a QB and then trade Murray either this year or next. Indy is an automatic for QB. Detroit no Las Vegas automatic for QB Overall by draft slot teams that need a QB: 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and maybe Tenn at 11, Hou again at 12, (Jets at 13 maybe), and perhaps Wash @ 14. That is 7 teams in the top 10 with definite QB need, potentially 10 in the top 15, looking at 2 franchise caliber players. Odds are somebody will back up their Brinks truck at Halas Hall.