AZ54

I'm good with keeping Seimian this year as the primary backup. He meshed well with Fields and you could see that on the sidelines when they were reviewing plays. There are so many other holes to fill this year. The better the rest of the roster is the more likely a backup is to win games which is what you saw in SF last year. Dorian Thompson-Robinson is a very good athlete but he is frustrating to watch because there are so many WTF throws. You saw that at the combine too and that's a very easy environment to throw passes because there is nobody in your face. As a UDFA he'd be worth a shot if your QB coach thinks that is fixable.

And Wash and maybe even the Jets

Suppose we make that trade back with Washington and land at 16 with Daron Payne in hand. We sign Taylor to anchor the RT spot. I'm going to assume those are out two big FA deal along with DJ Moore as the 3rd big contract. A LB is brought in on a 2nd tier deal. We'd still need one more DT and possibly LG and 2 DE. I just a did a mock and forced that trade 9 for 16 (no need to force it). Would you like this draft...

I’m thinking we stay cheaper at RT and sign Taylor plus an OC for the same money. In the wild rumor world of the Internet is the chatter we have now offered to Washington to swap first round picks in exchange for the rights to Payne. I don’t know if there is any truth to that whatsoever but it’s an interesting proposition. Further that would have to be done this weekend.

Right now my top target is Skoronski. Seems like he is the most likely perrenial Pro Bowl player and I like his position versatility. Ideal replacement at LG.

Imagine, if you will, a place and time in the future where the Carolina Panthers have the worst record in the NFL and the Bears have one of the best QBs. Ryan Poles tells the rest of the NFL if you want Caleb Williams you know the price.

Can we start a new thread for all the memes about Frank Reich and Chris Ballard?

No harm no foul. It isn't often I get something right.

Me too. A bird in the hand approach here fits as does the contract.

Who told me they wouldn't give up DJ Moore if they were trading up for a QB? Always aim high! Now we actually have a good WR group at the top 3 and will likely add a day 3 WR to help round it out with Velus.

That's why I played around with a drop back outside the top 10 in a mock draft. In that scenario my preference it to a RT with our first pick. I'd rather have the highly ranked OT than a highly ranked slot WR. JSN won't matter much if Fields is already scrambling out of the pocket and if all we can do is throw quick short routes JSN won't survive the season.

But wait there's more... https://www.si.com/nfl/bears/news/free-agent-players-who-fit-bears-needs Pro Football Focus might have faults but does a better job than any other independent source of grading off film, particularly on the offensive line. And last year they graded 81 tackles in the NFL. Taylor finished dead last as a run blocker, 81st. Even though he was highly ranked as a pass blocker, signing the worst run blocker in the league at right tackle for a run-oriented offense seems to defeat the purpose of free agency.

Did a double trade down outside the top 10 just to see how it feels. I actually like the result and this is only a 5 Rd draft. I kinda like having 4 first round picks in 2024 too. That might be wishful thinking but ending up with 3 first rd picks is definitely a possibility. With that we can control back to back NFL drafts. I tried to stick with what I think are realistic landing spots for players. For example Tyjae Spears was still around in the 4th when I took Chase but I think he'll be gone for sure. Chase might be gone too as I think he's a 3rd Rd talent, Sydney maybe higher. I like both of these players and wouldn't mind having twins on our roster. Overall I think the first 4 picks are very realistic landing spots for those players. With that I might not mind trading back outside the top 10. The last 3 might be realistic landing spots too as they all seem like depth players in the NFL. You might notice I don't know much about LB prospects because there isn't one in the list.

We have the inside scoop on Seumalo with Ian Cunningham.

Me too.

Good move, he's really good at what he does. Seems like a glue-guy in the locker room too.

That seems like the sweet spot on the value/performance curve. Brown is likely going to ask for at least $2-4mil/yr more. OTC has Taylor valued at $13mil/yr, Spotrac has him at $14mil/yr. OTC has Brown valued at $12.5mil/yr, Spotrac has him at $22mil/yr (link in case I forgot how to read big numbers: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/kansas-city-chiefs/orlando-brown-jr-25182/market-value/ ) That's a wild disparity for Brown but you can bet he'll be asking for the $22mil version. The difference is more than enough to sign Pocic who has value around $5mil/yr at OTC plus have change leftover. Scanning all the FA Centers at OTC just a simple valuation ranking it is Pocic at $5mil/yr and then a couple guys around $3mil/yr with the rest under $2mil/yr. Trying to figure out where to put resources Center seems like a single FA option which makes me think Poles will lean toward them trying to fix that via the draft and secure the known commodity vet RT. Doing the same valuation review for LG shows Ben Powers at nearly $10mil/yr, followed by Dalton Risner at $5mil/yr. Isaac Seumalo has no valuation on OTC. I don't know if Ben Powers fits our scheme. His draft profile from 2019 says he's lacks good lateral movement skills. I can't imagine that's better in 2023. OTOH Dalton Risner can move better as per his draft profile (as OT) although there are still some limitations. Oddly his draft comparison was Cody Whitehair. Supply and demand will likely put Risner over $5mil/yr but cutting Whitehair would net us $4mil in cap space. Risner would also not be so cost prohibitive long term if we were to draft an OG early like Mauch/Avila to play Center. Just in case those guys ended up not being a good fit at C. Cutting Patrick as well would completely negate the cap hit from signing Risner. I have no clue how Risner's performance compares to Whitehair. I'm not saying this is something we should do, just that it could be a path forward to get a bit younger and cheaper on the Oline until we get our draft picks ready to take over. Call him a "bridge" LG if you want.

https://trenchwarfare.substack.com/p/2023-ol-free-agency-rankings

https://www.profootballrumors.com/2023/03/jimmy-garoppolo-on-texans-radar When I see this my first thought is the Texans plan to draft Anthony Richardson. Sign Garoppolo and you have a caretaker for a year or two until Richardson is ready. However, any of the other QB needy teams could take the same approach even if they trade up to #1. That of course would leave either Stroud or Young available at #3. Cards want to trade back and most likely want a bigger haul than just dropping to #4 would give them. Ballard has to sort out if he's happy with Levis as he might be the only option left. There are plenty of reasons for him to be ok with that. Poles needs to go get his draft treasure chest filled up so we can watch this show from the bleachers.

I agree. Use the FA money to fix other positions.

No to Miles Sanders. I think he has some of the same vision problem Montgomery has at times. While Sanders' 4.9ypc might look good behind that Oline, if he's an upgrade over Monty he should have run for far more than 1269yds last year. That's just 74yds per game. Between those two I'd stick with the known and likely cheaper commodity.

Paris Johnson all day. Protecting Fields is job 1, I'll find a slot WR somewhere even if it's next year.

Zone Blocking Scheme (sorry it was late).

I think Anderson has much more lateral quickness than Mack. Which leads me to believe Anderson will have a higher win rate if his first move is stopped than Mack does. To do that Anderson will have to match Mack's intensity and hustle which was elite but I like the odds of that happening. I like him but can't put Tyree Wilson in a category with Mack. That will have to be earned. The Chandler Jones comparison seems about right.

Agreed more power guy but seems to have enough agility to bend around the edge even if he didn't do that much in college. Again these 3-man fronts used in college make it hard to assess based on just highlights. I'm in agreement we need one strong edge setter to help keep the Oline from expanding the width of the play, and one DE who is more pass rusher so I can relax more when opponents have a 3rd and 10+.