AZ54

I watched the Falcons/Panthers game. CPat is not nearly as agile as he used to be, he's mostly a linear athlete at this point or at least at this point in a season where he's primarily been used as a RB. Mariota, if he plays this week, was horrible in his reads, late on throws and forced some deep passes into coverage. He is under a lot of pressure which usually doesn't improve his performance. On the flip side he's still a mobile QB and can give a pass rush fits when he escapes the pocket. My other main takeaway from that game was that I like what our coaches are doing with our roster talent far more than what Atlanta is doing. It's a road game we need to get a good start and hopefully get their fans booing.

In that video the screenshot of the RAS score shows his 10yd split of 1.62 which is outstanding. For perspective that matches Von Miller although Von ran a 4.53 forty. The broad jump and vertical jump match the explosiveness. Can he bend and run around the corner? There was no 3-cone time in the RAS table so we'll just have to wait and see when he gets on the field.

As I said in the other thread on Montgomery we need this evaluation period to determine what we want to do with Montgomery. Wasn't hoping it would happen by injury to Herbert but this keeps Montgomery who is the better blocker on the field for Justin and given how many hits he's taking that important.

Not quite everyone.

I don't see anyone hiring Getsy. He hasn't done anything of note. I'm still being patient on the passing game in part because it's been such a mish mash of WRs on/off the field. Plus everyone learning a new scheme, young QB etc. I was glad to see Pringle get on the field today but we have to be realistic in that Fields has not played nor practiced with him much at all. Toss in Claypool, Harry when he's been out there, and you have 3 new guys with limited routes/timing/etc. We even had ISM out there for a few games before we cut him. I'm willing to give them some time to grow and expand their route trees. I'd be curious just what % of plays (vs. total in playbook) Getsy can call with them on the field. We don't see our RBs on routes very often either usually just screens. I believe there has to be much more in the scheme than what we've seen.

He had a good game but still missed on some plays. Once he literally cut off Gordon from his coverage by running between him and the WR. No need for the delayed blitz at that moment just step back and let the traffic clear. QB threw to Gordon's man and had a big gain. I think the defensive coaching was poor in this game. I know Eberflus said we needed to generate more pressure but knowing we have LBs in new positions (or rookie LB starting 2nd game) and Vildor out I don't think we should have blitzed 6 players as often as we did nor should we have blitzed that often overall. Early on we were just giving them easy first down pickups because there were no defenders to make a tackle. I don't mind some blitzes but IMO they should have been mixed in less often.

I still lean towards keeping him and that would be around the $6-7mil/yr rate simply because I think these two RBs compliment each other well. Monty is our best blocking RB and at times Herbert is still pretty bad blocking. Herbert is better in wide zone but Montgomery is the better inside zone runner and is better on short yardage situations. It's hard to say which is the better receiver since we don't get to use them in that aspect very often. Fix the Oline. This also depends on if we can structure the contract in a way that we can get out of it in 2 yrs because I'd like to think Ebner is the home run threat we are missing. Ebner just hasn't shown the vision yet in this scheme to be effective and there is also that blocking issue. I get that they are RBs, but protecting Fields is still job 1 for me. And my last reason is that keeping Montgomery now while we have plenty of cap space allows us to focus on fixing other needs on Oline, WR, DE, DT, LB. With so many FA RBs my guess is the team extends him an offer then lets him test the market and we see if we want to match.

We deserve to be in position to draft Jalen Carter.

That is the recipe for the future, score 30pts, give up 31pts.

One thing he deserves credit for is how he revised and improved his throwing motion over the offseason. Before the season started I was worried how that would hold up under the fire of a pass rush. He's had breakdowns and reverted to bad mechanics at times but even within a game you can see him recover to the new throwing motion. On top of that they made him change his pre-snap footwork. Breaking years of habits is really hard to do and he's fought through that in the first half of the season and now looks far more comfortable. One more offseason to ingrain the new mechanics and it should be second nature.

We could but we have a lot of holes to fill on defense and creating another one in 2023 isn't ideal IMO. Right now he's responded positively to the way the coaches want him to play and considering the lack of pass rush his turnovers are outstanding. He's expensive next year no doubt but cap space doesn't win football games good players do. Right now he's one of them. I move forward with him in 2023 and adjust as desired after next season. If someone falls our way in the draft and is performing well in 2023 we can look trade him for a draft pick mid-season.

Vander Esch will be interesting to see given his history with Eberflus. Do we want him or not?

Our 32nd ranked pass offense isn't likely to generate a lot of HC offers. He can get credit for having one of the best running games but how many teams have a QB like Fields? Even then it's only generated 3 wins so far.

She is a sleep expert so... I still don't see either happening.

Great video highlighting our GMs scouting work and philosophy. It is interesting that we have a GM, assistant GM, and coaches like Getsy who all prefer to be on the sidelines during games. From top to bottom our staff values the relationship aspect of the players and team overall. https://www.chicagobears.com/video/a-weekend-on-the-college-scouting-trail-with-poles-cunningham-1920-football-driv

You always want to pressure Goff because he'll make some toss-up throws off his back foot. We just have to disguise it well.

https://www.windycitygridiron.com/2022/11/9/23445383/2023-nfl-draft-top-15-defensive-tackles-chicago-bears-scouting-reports-jalen-carter-bryan-bresee Aside from the obvious top 2 DTs on the list (Carter, Bresee) I like what I see from Siaki Ika, Myles Murphy. Siaki is just a load to work against and moves well laterally making him very tough to block. Might not be a true 3-tech but having him on the line can only help if he could be in the shape Eberflus demands. That's a big question mark right now. Murphy is a high effort player with good movement skills but has poor stats this season. I only saw his 2021 highlights and don't know how he's being utilized this season. Could be a day 3 addition to replace someone like Blackson. The main takeaway for me is that this Dline draft class doesn't appear to be very deep so FA has to play a bigger role here. The lack of depth could motivate younger DTs to declare early.

That entire Colts situation and how the GM Chris Ballard got put on the sideline by the owner is an interesting story. It was just last year they were a team on the rise with 9 wins and 2nd place in their division. Unfortunately Ballard brought the Chicago QB luck with him (and lost Luck). I don't understand the whole Jeff Saturday situation with him never coaching in the league. Even if he's capable of leading a team, that seems like someone who is way underprepared for that job to just walk in midseason. Compare that to Eberflus who seems to have pre-planned for everything from the details of each practice to exactly what happens during bye weeks.

Reportedly he's already earned that bonus. With the money issue now a sunk cost we'll know for sure who the team thinks is the best fit at RT.

Chiefs have $28mil in cap space with just 33 players under contract. Frank Clark is the obvious cut saving them $20mil. in space but $7mil in dead cap. The only other significant option is Valdes-Scantling which would save $7mil but also $4mil dead cap. They don't have other easy options so this is a team to watch in the offseason. If they want to get rid of Chris Jones I'll take him off their hands but most likely they'll try to extend his deal and push out the cap space hit.

From today's press conference it's clear Eberflus was not happy with the pass coverage last week (nobody was). Some of that is players not executing as per assignments or game plan. Some is the lack of pass rush. He was pretty clear today that we have to do a better job of mixing it up to get pressure. I'm expecting Sanborn and Morrow to play better this week. I just watched the Miami game again focusing on a few plays and during the course of the game you could see the run reads and filling the gaps improve. For his part Sanborn asked Morrow what to do on seemingly every play, which is ok, they are standing next to each other but doesn't bode well for knowing your role. Sanborn was also really late getting into coverage. Hopefully after watching his performance he'll be a step or two closer to where he should be this week. Detroits offense is middle of the road in both passing and rushing. Their pass defense is 25th in total yards given up, run defense 27th. They can't be looking forward to defending Fields diverse skill set. Now with Claypool in his 2nd week of the offense he'll be doing more they haven't seen on film. Detroit contained the Packers running game last week but gave up 291yds passing. On the offensive side it was just 137yds passing and 118yds rushing. The one player that worries me is Aidan Hutchinson because his pass rush strength plays into our weakness blocking. Expect to see help to his side and they might go back to what Dallas and NE did where the backside DE just runs upfield first to cover the rollouts. I'd like to get Borom back on the field as I think he's a better 2nd level run blocker than Reiff. He's just more athletic and can get to better blocking angles. I've seen some say Reiff is better in pass pro but he still gave up some pressures. Pringle is 21d window practicing again this week so it's possible he's active this game (pushing Velus further down the depth chart). Matt Adams also entered the 21d window.

I'm in agreement on Jaylen. I'm expecting we'll have a top 15 pick maybe as high as 10. Players I like there are DT Bresee, DE Foskey, OTs Broderick Jones, Jaelyn Duncan, and possibly Skoronski (he looks slow to me). Preference is for one of the defensive players but Fields is the future and that starts now. I believe Braxton Jones can fix his issues with bull rushes with an offseason to focus on his technique. At RT I don't think Borom is the answer. He's either our swing OT or needs to move inside. Leatherwood is still a question mark at OT and if not there, is he an OG? Ideally we find a way to get these guys (Leatherwood, Carter, Eiselen) some reps by the end of the season so we can have some idea what we have on the Oline. While I see options inside we have nothing at RT beyond hoping it's Leatherwood. RT could be something we address in FA if a good option is there. Whitehair might be the veteran leader today but it's entirely possible we move on from him in favor of the younger OGs. In that case adding a vet presence to the line would be helpful IMO. If Elgton Jenkins hits the market that would appear to be the best solution. Market value is forecasted to be $14mil/yr, we could get back $10mil of that cap hit by making Whitehair a post Jun 1st cut.

Here's the J.T. O'Sullivan review. Justin has improved quite a bit on many plays but there is still room to improve. He's 9 games into this new offense and now working with what might be the 5th combination of WRs on the field. I'd heard that N'Keal Harry said he ran one route incorrectly. The arrow is pointing up overall for the offense. Watching these play breakdowns and it's easy to see how our WRs struggle against man coverage. When Trent Dilfer reviewed this Miami game he brought up the point that now with several games of film on Fields running he expects to see defenses revert to more zone coverage. That allows the entire defense to keep their eyes on the QB. Miami used a spy defender on some plays but it didn't work. Coverages are always mixed throughout a game but more zone will make it easier for the WRs to get open. It also puts the burden back on Fields to read it quickly and take the simple play which he wasn't doing well earlier in the season.

I have no issues whatsoever with the accountability being shown toward the WRs. ISM was cut. I think Pettis at one point was close to losing his job but at that time he had less competition and when players started returning to good health he had corrected or improved enough. Velus as a healthy scratch needed or at least deserved that message. If Velus earns his reps back in practice then (hopefully) we'll see him again if not we'll see him next year. I don't think his role was ever going to be that of a top 3 WR for us. He'll be used in the occasional jet sweep plays, screens, and some crossing routes and they'll toss in an occasional deep ball. However, with Claypool on board there is almost no need for Velus to run deep routes. Mooney and Claypool can work those just fine and mix in something here and there for Harry or Pringle. We should just let Velus use his YAC ability on the short to intermediate routes. The catches aren't as difficult for a player with less than ideal hands and we've already seen how his speed and strength challenges defenders. In a 1on1 open field situation I like the odds with Velus to make that guy miss. We've already seen him gain 10yds on plays where it looked like we should get 5. As teams adjust to Claypool's deep threat the underneath stuff will open up even more. Add in that Fields can just as easily roll out to the weakside and defenders have a lot to watch for. I think he could do that role for us well enough to take Pettis off the field now except for the return issues.