Lucky Luciano

turnovers absolutely killed the lions. it flipped the points. one pick 6 and some int's in the redzone or endzone if i remember correctly. it was a qb's nightmare of a game.

goff lost that game. the lions should have won by a lot. the offense had multiple opportunities to come back but goff kept throwing int's at critical junctures. he is responsible for at least 21 point against the lions. nothing wrong with the lions offense i could see.

favre was not developed by mccarthy. it was holmgren. rogers first year was under sherman and he was backing up favre for 3 years

i have stated numerous times that belly is way over rated. yea, look at the record before and after bledsoe and brady. it's easy to be a winning coach when you have excellent and HOF qb's not to mention it always helps when you CHEAT. and is there any way POSSIBLE that you rate wilson or any other seattle qb he coached even CLOSE to favre and rogers? really?

show me his success without HOF qb's. any championships? how many post season wins against the best? west coast offense? probably works ok with veteran HOF qb's running it but how many superbowls with all that talent? even with HOF qb's his post season is dismal. HC with GB 13 years only TWO seasons with more than one and done or no wins at all and included in that the one SB win. that is not what you want, or at least that is not what i want.

they would both have to agree (this includes rivera as DC). if johnson is the man you CAN'T force any coaches on him or it's just the same ole same ole in chicago. you can give him the options if he takes the job and he makes the decisions.

shannahan or ravens harbaugh

if olson says that then that should scare the bejesus out of everyone. that system has been beaten 30 years ago. we would be doing the same thing as we did with lovie. rely on a system that is outdated and obsolete. not me, i don't want it or the freaking cover 2 like lovie ran.

you never know about carroll. he is basically out because of age but would be a GREAT short term choice here as assistant HC or if no johnson i take him as HC for the 3 year window. rivera would be a very good choice as DC especially if no carroll. has HC experience and certainly won't take any crap.

or maybe johnson with carroll as assistant HC? that would be nice. a temp assistant to get johnson up to speed and show him the ropes.

i'm all in on that. johnson and if that doesn't work for whatever reason pete carroll. screw mccarthy.

that's the dream team for me. johnson/rivera. if we are going for the experienced coach i have to take carroll. he is my second choice. 3 years to develop caleb and an OC to groom as the next HC. he should have his choice on who comes in to that position if they know he is in line for a team that is up and running. consistency across the board. people like and trust him. or... do we get another retread/experiment in mccarthy? if anyone here has scratched their heads with bizarre calls on 4th down get ready for some more with mccarthy.

don't think i want rivera for HC but certainly a possible DC.

wouldn't you to get rid of him too? seriously, loyalty was one of carroll's faults. if that is the only one i have no problem at all with it. that is what a GM is for.

every professional sport franchise in chicago is the same. incompetent. the bulls, sox, cubs. reihnsdork is as bad if not worse than mccaskey's. it dates back to the halas's/mccaskey's, wriggley, comiske to bidwell (the owner of the chicago cards). it's hard to comprehend. if you want the worst ownership, chicago is the place.