Alaskan Grizzly

I would assume that the old adage applies here; "no news is good news" but just wanted to see if any of you "locals" had heard anything more on Urlacher's status and his calf. Would figure that it shouldn't affect him too much but these days, who knows? I say keep him out for the rest of Preseason, regardless. Let Roach get some more reps in.

There was a keeper league last year? I did the "traditional" FF with folks from this site in the past. One that Pix used to run but didn't do a keeper last year.... that I recall.

This seems a lot different than what I understood "keeper leagues" to be. The major difference being you kept the majority of the team save two or three players. Then you negotiate where your upcoming picks go based on the "value" of that player amd especially if there is a trade valuation. Anyhow, it would seem the majority like this proposal and I too am willing to try out this "keeper" idea. As far as players kept, I say two. I think one round higher or round taken for that "kept" player sounds fair which, as you mentioned, cancels out the next idea of whether the first round pick is given up. I say yes. Not so sure I agree with how long you should keep your players. Not really a big fan of putting a number on it as that kind of goes away from the idea of "keeper" league. But again, if majority rules. Draft order sounds perfect. Makes sense. And the last points (5 and 6) sound pretty reasonable to me. Count me in as interested.

First off, congrats. How did you get that? Secondly, I'm all for a keeper league. Was asking about that last year. Would really like to try it out. Not sure I would want to go head to head with you though . Maybe we can work something out? Takers?

So if Lebron James were to play for the Bulls, what more (besides the Cubs winning it all) could a Chicago sports fan ask for? Maybe James would be interested in catching a few from Cutler?

A few years ago Scotty Gomez (when playing for the Devils and who is from Anchorage Alaska) brought the Cup back to Anchorage. Man was that a big deal. Apparently each player on the team gets to take it (trophy) to their "hometown" for a tour and available for the fans to look at, photograph, etc. I thought at the time, especially not being a true hockey fan, that it was a pretty cool idea. I further agree that the Lombardi trophy is still sweeter. Which reminds me MadLith...nice ad that you found there. And I thought my license plate was clever.... But you, AZ54, have one even better.

I figured things are slow so why not ? Congrats to the Blackhawks and the city of Chicago!

Thanks for your civil replies. I am one of maybe one that likes Lovie and would like to see him win it all. As far as Cowher goes, I am always flabbergasted when I see those wishing for him to be the next coach. I can't remember where or exactly when it was but there was an article some time back where it was said that coaches that go from one team to another, especially if they were previously successful, rarely continue that trend. I think with the Steelers (as an example) it is more the ownership/management that is successful rather than the coaches. In Chicago it too is successful but in a different way. They are not only the oldest team in the NFL but also the winningest team in history. Mostly due to the likes of Halas, coincidently which is the tie to the current ownership in Chicago. At any rate, going along with MadLith's desire to "win it all" I ask what if Lovie does win it all? What if he doesn't and "they" bring in a new coach, how long does he (the new guy) have to "win it all" before they too need to move on? There aren't that many Bill Belichick's out there. Lest we be reminded that he (Belichick) actually went from not so good (in Cleveland) to a bit better (New England). Regardless of "modern era" or not, Lovie has a winning record plain and simple. The others you make comparisons to, did not. So if not Lovie, then who???

MadLith: Another thing Lovie is third in is all- time winningest coach of the Bears behind Halas and Ditka. I do agree that if things don't improve this year then Lovie should be asked to go but if the team improves I agree with the idea of letting him coach out his contract and then assess.

Besides the point that Pixote makes remember you are talking about an O-lineman....who is 6'8" and 300 and some odd pounds. You could've drafted a guy like this in the 1st round, paid him a whole heck of a lot more money and gotten possibly less or as much production. This is a project you try out and if he doesn't work out, no big loss. If he does, you are considered a genious for finding him in the rough. So let me ask you this, of the following names what do you think they all have in common? Steve Tasker, Eric Martin, Bo Jackson, Kevin Gogan, Leon Lett, Keenan McCardell, Odewale Ogunleye and Shaun O'Hara. I can tell you each of the above listed guys were drafted 7th round or less (and in the case of Ogunleye and O'Hara not at all) and were all Pro-Bowlers at some point in their careers. And these were names I randomly found in draft classes 1985, 87, 91 and 2000. You just never know what you're going to get. The one sure positive is the Bears currently have a 1st round going into next year's draft. Something that couldn't have been said the last two years.

Hey BJ, not a stupid question really. It could be I like Kodiak Grizzlies because I thought they were "photo"genic not from an island in Alaska. Yes been in Alaska now 33 years this summer. (33 too many if you ask me). And did you say "down to" 62?

At the half Bulls up by 11. For those of you drinking and whatever in your garages. And by the way TErra, it's snowing ALOT right now. And that is why I'm watching bball.

To borrow a phrase from an eloquent linguinist I know; "mark my words" as the Lions now have Suh we are in for a long year against Detroit. I predict Chicago goes at least .500 against the Lions, if not worse.

I think Angelo means it this time. Going three years without a #1 (or 2 for that matter) is a lot to gamble on. I don't think it necessary to give up next years 1 anyhow. The skill positions are pretty well covered; QB - check, RB- check (2 times) WR - possibly (or at least I'm told), CB - check (despite what others think Tillman will do fine and Bowman will come into his own), LB/DE - BIG check. The only one not so sure is the FS and this draft is FULL of good talent at that position. Plenty that the Bears can wait until round three. As far as OL, I say let's see what Tice/Martz can do with what they've got before really starting to panic. And Terra... Consider your words marked and highlighted.

To "TNrick" : Yes the Nashville Predators. I don't believe it either. The Blackhawks were top-tier going into the playoffs. Talked about in hockey circles of going a long way. But given your moniker, I assume you might pull for Memphis? To Terra Tor: I would agree except for two things. If it's not the Bears I don't watch much sports unless one of the "other" Chicago teams make the playoffs (save the Cubs) and the winters in Alaska are realllllly long.

It's time to catch both the Bulls and Blackhawks in playoff mode. The Bulls are down 0-2 to the Cavaliers and start at 8 PM Eastern and the 'Hawks are down 1-2 to Memphis and start up at 8:30 PM Eastern. Both need Chicago fan support at this point. See there is something positive about the Bears picking in the later rounds.

I dunno, if Jim Schwartz can get all the pieces working together they have brought in this and last year, they could be a pretty decent team.

I especially like the three "APRIL" preseason games. Hoowah!!!!!

http://wap.nfl.com/site?t=uxH78wwF4fpVx6vF...mA&sid=nfl2 Looks like no "Cutler / Marshall" reunion this year.

Here's to a successful career to one of the best Bears in recent history. How about a nice "Gator clap"? I'll actually miss watching Alex doing his post play celebration. It meant things were going good for Chicago.

From what I saw, if it was the right episode and to synopsize; Mike Mayock thinks the Bears haven't done enough to pass up the Packers and Vikings. That's why Mayock does College analysis, he doesn't know what he's talking about in the Pros.

For some reason every time I see Tebow and hear the detractors I think of Flutie. Intelligent and innovative player. I think whoever drafts him will be pleasantly surprised. And regarding this Dekota Wilson, I assume he is a Safety? Those are good numbers for a big man.

I think by "strange" you mean injured? From what I read he was out since '08 with a back(?) injury? Probably should pass on this one.

I still like Myron Rolle for some reason. Probably because he can be had in round 3 or 4 and your guy will be long gone by then.

I especially like the brown helmets. Instead of cheese heads they could be called turd heads. The accompanying article is below. http://host.madison.com/sports/football/pr...1cc4c03286.html