Mongo3451

Agreed!

I don't see it as snarky, maybe a little nit picky. It doesn't matter how or why he failed to make teams in the past. It also doesn't matter how long he has played the game. What does matter is if he can play.

That cut and paste of yours pretty much summed it up. In the past, he has shown great measurables that didn't translate to making the team. Not sure if that cleared it up or not. The entire context of my thoughts were that some players never figure out how to play when the hitting starts. Guys like him stick around longer because the coaches see immense talent in hope that it will develop.

His failures and lack of development have occurred when the pads come on. Some players simply can't play with contact. I hope he relishes his opportunity enough to understand the fearless sacrifice it takes to succeed and plays according to his skillset. It would a huge bonus to have a matchup nightmare like him.

We play with less for a few reasons. We have transaction fees and a waiver wire system with a pecking order. So, we get more transactions resulting in a higher season end payout. It makes you manage your roster in a manner that saves money and your pecking order slot. The bonus is, that you get an opportunity to really screw your buddies out of a player they covet as the season progresses.

Alonzo Spellman comes to mind.

No offense taken. Shanahan's version was more vertical than Walsh's. Regardless of the run/pass ratio when Cutler had his big year. Shanahan prefers to run first. Cutlers big year also had a lot to do with how horrible Denver's defense was and lack of a quality running back. There were a lot of 4th quarter fluff yards in attempt to come back. I believe Trestman is a little closer to Walsh from what I've seen in the past.(which is a lot of short/quick hitting timing routes that are not Cutler's thing) That being said, I believe Trestman is smart enough to see what has worked for Cutler in the past and go with it. Of course I've said that in the past as well.

It wasn't close to true WCO. I'll admit that I have not seen the modern Trestman version, but his Steve Young and Rich Gannon versions were closer to the Bill Walsh offense. Lucky for us Young and Gannon were both athletic QB's.

Agreed on all. Cutler is NOT the ideal QB for WCO. Can he adapt? Of course he can, but it will take Cutler humbling himself to bend to the will of the expectations placed upon him. He is a point and shoot guy by nature and trust and anticipation may not come naturally to him. We'll see soon enough. As far as the OL is concerned, I think the talent is there to be solid. I know we bled the continuity discussion dry, but the key will be how fast they gel as a unit. Positive karma on the lack of injuries this year.

me too

I'm good with it. While Webb will go into this year make or break, I'm convinced the OL as a whole looks improved on paper, scheme and coaching. I definitely look for Garza to be upgraded next season and Webb too if he does not become solidly average.

Read some comments like, where's the outrage as compared to Michael Vick. I for one am in shock/disbelief over this. While the Vick thing was infuriating and saddening to me, this is simply sub human.

Nice one!

We are essentially arguing the word if. Silly...

I'm more old school when it comes to football. But, if it gives Trestman some information he can exploit, I'm all for. Definitely can't hurt.

No starter has bee named. If anyone takes reps at RT with Cutler under center, there is competition.

You are the only one that thinks Jason is right.

Burping methane? Stinky Q-Tips? Pasty pallet? I can provide more...

You lost credibility last year with your constant support of Chris Williams over Webb. (Even after Williams clearly lost and is currently sucking elsewhere) Don't go there again please. Now, we have Scott and the rookie competing and it's the same old thing. Webb, again, is not being handed anything. You mentioned in another post, he must be Dez White? Don't you think the coaches looked at the three years of game film on him? (over and over) If he WINS the job, he's the BEST we have period. The reason he was NOT replaced is because he was one of the BEST we had last year. Trust me, I'm NOT a Webb fan. But if he continues to improve as he did last year, he'll be your whipping boy for the next decade. Objectivity has it's place...

Good! I hope they drill it through Cutler's thick head so he doesn't learn the hard way.

Ahhh... Good news then.

It doesn't go away in a week. He must have some Lovie in his bloodline...

Add that McClellin has plantar fasciitis.

Correct. The changes we'll see is a little more press coverage from our CB's, which can have positive and negative results. Positive will be less underneath stuff will be availible. Negative will be that our safeties will be depended on more to cover the holes that cover 2 provides. Regardless, of anything else, we will be able to go back to playing Lovie ball anytime we want if that's where the success is. I'm not worried about the D as much as I am the offense gelling in time.(especially the OL)