Mongo3451

Absolutely. You can already tell he spends time in the weight room. He's got guns like Bobbie Massie.

Huge wingspan too. That's why they say he needs to get stronger.

We don't need a starting guard. LT is still a problem.

Yea, that's a head scratcher. He looks like a Deebo though.

Tom, Raimann or Tolbert would be good. I don't know how Poles has rated players, but IMO OL and WR are the biggest needs. As fans, we tend to be more to the emotional side of drafting. It seems like they are staying with BPA and will have adjust accordingly later.

Gordon and Brisker were BPA. It shows Poles will stick to the plan.

Bastards!

McAfee says he kicks piss missles...?. He broke him down on his show and said he's a game changer.

One last dream draft. Traded down twice because I liked how it was playing out.

That's savage!

I wonder why they gave you D- for Araiza. That dude will be a fifteen year difference maker...

I was surprised at the Cole Strange pic, but not Tyler Smith. Smith has tremendous upside. I was really hoping he would fall to us. His interview on GMFB was awesome. You can really tell he's got some Steve McMichael in his brain.

I'm good with all of it. I'm tired of the Bears getting close and having the window slammed shut for one reason or another. It's time to build that rock solid foundation from the ground up. Whoever may be used up in three years is on the block.

Same!

No

Quinn is a huge commodity as far as trade bait is concerned, Monty not so much. Quinn gets to the QB, which makes everyone else's job easier on defense. Monty is a good RB, but there's nothing special about him that changes games. If you project Monty's worth to when this team will be viable again, it's better to get younger legs if you can fetch a good draft pick for him.

I don't like the concept of drafting an LT prospect late in the draft to develop. If you like an LT prospect early, get him. At a minimum, he should be able to be a key back up, starting OG or late season starter.

There should plenty of cap and post draft cuts to get an OG.

Agreed to all. I would be in prison if stuff like this was serious. Would we even be talking about this if it were Tony Stewart?

We are in a place to give a guy a year to develop. We are playing this year to build the base and develop Fields. We can sign serviceable players, post draft, to fill the gap until next year. My personal mindset is to draft BPA for where we are headed as a team. There are scenarios where stashing a guy is best.

Good stuff.

That's right. He wanted the contract extension and didn't get it. Then he gets hurt and gave them the big f u as they were carting him off.

Loved him on GMFB. Very insightful, intelligent, confident and a stone cold killer. Gotta have him!

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply the article was old. Some websites update as buzz around a player happens. Most of the main sites have Watson and Smith going in the first and the trend has slowly moved that way. The main draft sites update frequently, while the independent guys may have old data. Anyway, I love this stuff. Playing armchair GM and coach warms all of the old football injuries and keeps me in the game.

Is it possible their data used was old? For the sake of it being accurate, I'd trade with Cleveland at 50 and 64 for 39. That gives us 48, 50, 64 and 71. With those picks I take Smith, Moore, Leaf and Pierce.