Mongo3451

That'll be interesting to watch play out. Some site projected him to get 7-8 due to comparable performance and contracts. Somebody always over pays for players they feel will make a difference. Other than us, the Bengals make the most sense, but their owner is a major tightwad.

I would love that as a Bears fan.

They brings us to 5 OL somewhat under contract. I truly expect them to sign Daniels, but you never know what the Bengals might do with all their loot.

My bad. Luck was out that season and they went 4-12. Next year was 11-7. The following year Brissette took over, then Phil, then Carson. He messed up by not drafting one last year, but Reich took the blame. It's been a weird deal. I heard that they reached out to Rivers last year as well.

Ballard was handed a bad hand in Indy to start his career. Nobody knew Luck was going to unexpectedly quit. In the meantime, he retooled the roster to where they just need a QB to contend. Frank Reich is on record that he stuck his neck out there to get Carson Wentz. Sure Ballard it's ultimately on Ballard, but I probably would have listened to my HC that knew him best. In the meantime, Jimmy G is probably the new Alex Smith.

They all just recieved RFA tenders.

I look for Seattle to parlay those picks to get Watson.

Yeah, it would be tough. But, with Quinn you get something proven. Contenders that need just a little more might do it.

That's why I think an asset or two will be traded, especially Quinn. This is the only year we get the benefit of knowing what several scouting departments think. Anyone over 30 won't be here when we get good.

I wouldn't wait till the 5th. Good catch Stinger.

At first, I said no to Zion, as I read various articles that his athleticism was limited. He did very well for himself this week. GM's loved him in the interviews. I still contend LT is priority one, but after that any good OL prospect will make us better.

Good list. David Bell may slip to the middle after running a 4.65. He might be a good fit in the 3rd/4th round if we draft a fatty first.

Every year players stock rises and falls at the combine. Who y'all got?

Agreed for the most part. If there's a dream scenario where someone wants to move up a couple spots and nobody between is targeting your guy, take the win.

You beat me by 30 seconds on Pierce, lol...

Also, Alec Pierce ran an unexpected 4.33. He's almost 6'3. He needs to hit the weight room, but we need that speed. I got that from the Sporting News. NFL Network has him at 4.41 and over 6'3

Yes, good speed from WR's mode very well for us. Something else that is a good sign, is that the QB's have impressed. That will move more WR and QB into the first round and potentially let an OL slide to us that we didn't expect. And with so many WR running well, one of them should be available in the second or third. Fatties are working out today!

Good catch on that one. (No pun intended) He was actually their number 4, behind Gallup.

Skyy wasn't the twichiest guy out there, but he was the most fluid. The way he runs looks effortless. Combine that with the excellent acceleration he showed should make him a deceiving route runner. I want see some footage of him against press coverage. If he's adept at beating that, he'll be a good one. Totally love every single thing Poles has had to say since he's been hired.

Listening to Jurko talk today and he unequivocally stated that Jenkins is not a left tackle. That doesn't mean Poles sees it that way. If he does, that's damning as hell on Pace. I truly would love to see Jenkins in the Pro Bowl, but I think it's going to be at RT.

Daniels will command 6.5 to 8 mil per year based on performance and similar contracts. I highly doubt some team sees him as a hidden gem and gets him to 8 figures. I would honestly do a post June 1 cap cut on Whitehair before losing Daniels.

He's not going to get to 8 mil. He's also better than Borom and Whitehair while only being 24.

I get the money saving part, but at what point do we start having competition and depth? If Daniels is proven, make Borom take a position from someone. (That is extremely important in building culture) We only have 3 guys under contract, so all hands on deck.

Why would a scenario drafting an OT and C mean Daniels is gone? We only have three OL under contract and Daniels is better than all of them. I like that draft with keeping Daniels. That being said, Peters would still be needed to ensure stability and to be a mentor.

He stole that money from KC. He didn't last the first week. He's made too much money to accept a vet minimum, unless he's dying to play again.