jason

Dude, don't flatter yourself. I don't give a damn about riling you up or whether or not you think I need your approval/assistance. I'm just saying you're in the vast minority here, and I don't see why you are trying to take a holier than thou attitude as if we couldn't possibly have a winning or better team without Lovie. Face it, nearly everyone disagrees with the fact you wanted to keep Lovie, despite how moderately dissatisfied you were/are.

EXACTLY

Dude, what are you thinking? Why is it a sad day? You sure do have a warped view of how a franchise should be run. A true fan should be happy that Lovie was fired because it shows the team is not content with a HC who continually makes the same mistakes and can't get over the hump. It says the Bears are not happy with simply having a winning season. That is what a true fan should also want. But if you're cool with missing the playoffs every year and seeing the exact same problems every year, then maybe the definition of fan changed since last I looked it up.

Lovie can look in the mirror for blame on the Seattle game. If he weren't so gung ho about shutting the team down when they get even the slightest of leads, this team would have made the playoffs and he would probably still have his job.

Exactly. F U Lovie

I still blame Lovie for Urlacher's injury. If he weren't running 30 yes back from the LOS then it would never be an issue.

It is like a broken record for me. I won't believe it until they do it.

You're right, but that performance is the exact same reason why fans are disillusioned with this team's chances in the playoffs.

See, I view it from a different perspective. When guys like Hester and Weems keep getting trotted out for snap after snap, I don't see that as a substitute player's flaw. I see that as a coaching flaw. When guys don't perform, changes should be made. Maybe Sanz would have done better than Hester? He certainly runs better routes and is undoubtedly smarter (i.e. knows the plays). Same goes for Rodriguez over Davis/Spaeth. Davis has been horrible this year, so Rodriguez should have been in the game as a flex TE. This coaching staff has no damn clue how to build an offense, how to evaluate offensive talent, or to execute a successful offense against an opponent.

Not bad overall.

Hand the ball to the cyborg in Adrian Peterson's skin = Frazier is doing a good job.

It's a good, weighted-statistic, but it doesn't tell the entire picture. Just studying the numbers a little bit shows the Bears are immensely flawed on offense. They have the only negative DVOA on offense in the top ten teams, and one of only two in the top 15 (Cincy). And even considering that is kind of ridiculous when looking at the Bears' Offensive DVOA (-10.2) vs. Cincy's (-0.9). A team that flawed on offense (something we knew without stats) can only be saved by the D/ST so often before it causes the team to lose. Which is kind of why many are sour on this team advancing to the playoffs; we realize it's false hope that will probably let Lovie keep his job while getting ass-hammered in the first round.

The sad thing is, your post makes complete sense.

Jennings was mandatory. He leads the league in INTs. Whenever there is doubt for a DB, the highlight stats are INTs.

I'm in, but I hope the Bears win because one DL player has a monster game, takes out Stafford early, and the Lions still move the ball at will...but stalling in the red zone when they move too far. As a result, they have to punt to Hester about ten times, and he takes one or two to the house (I know, unlikely this year). Then the offense does, well, pretty much what it has done all year. That way it's a win, but Lovie still looks bad.

Is this one of those "we have the roster space because someone is on IR, so let's go ahead and sign someone"-moves?

Wouldn't surprise me if he became a reliable 2nd or 3rd possession target for Dalton.

I don't know about way past his prime, but he's certainly not the speed-demon, tackling-machine he once was.

FA LT, Fluker, Jones, AND our normal 2nd/3rd round picks!? Where do I sign that petition?!

Abso-freaking-lutely.

Much better this past game (like the whole OL), but I fear it's a fluke, and like we've seen before, it will regress. The rub, of course, is to recognize the likelihood of a regression before committing to someone. The Bears have not been good at this in recent years. And I definitely don't want false hope, like the last few years, to cause the Bears to draft other than OL for any reason.

I guess the difference is that I value long-term success over a one year flash in the plan where they get bumped out of the playoffs with almost no chance of actually going the whole way. If two steps back get the Bears ten forward, then I am willing to begrudgingly accept the losses if it means many more wins and much more success. Plain and simple, Lovie Smith has to go, and two wins would probably give him enough bargaining ammo for an extension.

Agreed. That's why I put in the caveat of an extra second rounder.

I just realized the QB that is having a decent game against the vaunted Bears defense is a guy I have literally never heard of.

No, that's not actually what we want. You're just thinking of this in simple terms. The ideal situation is that they look like shit and somehow pull out a win. Best of both worlds. The problem is, if they get wins it's how head coaches typically fight for their jobs. I don't know how you can consider yourself a fan if you are satisfied with mediocrity year after year.