Jump to content

jason

Super Fans
  • Posts

    8,702
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jason

  1. I got a front row view of a lot of things today, a different perspective than ever before, and here are a few things I saw: -That 5-yd cushion garbage evidently doesn't apply to Knox and Hester, because they Falcons DBs were on them the entire game -Regarding the 5-yd cushion, the Line Judge took an ass chewing several times; it even looked like Lovie got fired up once -Anthony Adams is a great dancer, too bad he doesn't seem to care about the game -Greg Olsen mouthed several F-bombs when watching the defense play -Greg Olsen is the only guy on the sideline who looks like he wants to win above anything else -The entire OL is slow and blah in everything they do. They came back after each horrible performance and didn't seem too upset about it. -The OL barely got coaching information the entire game. -Andrea Kramer just looks like she doesn't have a friggin clue about what's going on. If she said something about Ogunleye's hip flexor injury, it's because I told her. -Pisa looks like his right(?) knee was killing him. The doctor/trainer came over, did a few knee tests, and it was obvious that he was done. He probably tore something. -Tillman has the look of someone without confidence. He has a glazed over look in his eyes like he just plain wants to quit. -Ogunleye was standing behind the trainer's table and I yelled, "You know you hate the cover-2, Wale! Wale, you hate the cover-2!!" He nodded, twice. -I'd love to see what the Bears' fans could pull off with a dome. It's such an advantage. It's a few hours after the game, and my ears are still ringing. -Tackling is still horrendous, and it's easy to see the problems up close. Someone needs to let the guys know it's tackle THEN strip the ball. And the most important thing I saw... -The entire team seems apathetic. I don't know where it comes from, but I have a suspicious thought in the back of my head I know its source. They just don't have the fire, and several don't seem to even care. Hell, there were tons of times when most on the sideline weren't even watching the game - which doesn't say everything - but it just doesn't look like a cohesive group that cares all that much. And, the coup de grace, I have NEVER seen a team so happy immediately after a tough loss like this. And, speaking of happy, Omaliye was as happy as a fat kid in a cake factory. He obviously doesn't care about losing, care about sucking more than possibly anyone in the NFL, and he's evidently good friends with several guys on the Falcons. This team needs a spark, badly.
  2. Like it should have been this past year?! You know I agree with this idea. Read the signature line...
  3. Let's be honest, it's not hard to agree with this thread. After all, Turner does suck. He's unimaginative and predictable. Hell, three or four of us at the game were predicting plays based upon formation, and we were doing well. Damn well. And we don't have the advantage of this being our job, and without the game tape. Suffice to say, the opposing defensive coaches can predict the Bears offense quite a few times per game. However, he didn't fumble that ball on the goal line, twice. That killed the Bears. I actually like the toss/sweep play. It's not like the run upt he middle was doing well. The call allows Forte to look for a lane, cut back, and blast through. Of course, it would be great if the Bears' OL didn't suck at run blocking - a point that is completely undebateable. One play, on the other hand, doesn't make the game. And Turner had far too many opporunities where he was predictable, and it hurt the Bears. Where in the world was the play-action rollout to the tight end? That play is MONEY. And it's especially effective on the goal line, or close to it. There were plenty of missed opportunities out there, and it's on Turner to find them. In the several years he's been here, he hasn't found them very often. It's time for a new OC.
  4. Yes, those are my beliefs. And, no. Orton would be doing worse, because the WRs are younger, the holes are tighter (alllriiiight), and the OL worse. Agreed. That's why I didn't like the Benson pick when it was made. I didn't think the pieces fit. But once they drafted him, I figured the Bears front office would do a better job of building an OL that could take advantage of Benson's style. Didn't happen. The ego check was needed, but if the Bears actually had an OL that fit his style (i.e. the Cincy OL), then it may have never been needed. More on this in a second... Agreed on everything. And my comments about weak-minded, pampered superstars support this idea. He didn't excel immediately in Chicago, wasn't the best player immediately in Chicago, and it hurt his fragile psyche. You're probably right, but I would have much rather seen the Bears draft the OL to support him, than draft another high RB who, despite a great rookie season, is struggling behind an OL that is, once again, not that great. But of course, with you, I'm preaching to the choir on the OL thing.
  5. I think that I wasn't complete enough in my original post. Obviously the dude had/has some issues between the shoulders, but I honestly believe he's one of those fragile superstars who have been pampered their entire lives, and when things aren't perfect for them, with great family/friends/teammates/coaches, they buckle. With the coaches and offensive line, not to mention the Thomas Jones preference from other players, he buckled. Maybe now he's a stronger person mentally. It just bugs me that the Bears got burned yet again.
  6. jason

    Poll

    Yes, it has to be the Medicine Woman. Anyone who says Cade McNown is retarded. He wasn't great, but he produced in a few games and is infinitely better than a few other QBs already named in this thread.
  7. Regarding the Benson talk, I said it was a mistake to let him go. The reason he underperformed with the Bears was diverse, and started with sharing time with TJ, but in his last year it resulted from the fact that the OL was atrocious...something that has only seen a bandaid applied. Lo and behold, Benson goes to Cincy, gets behind a road-grader OL, and he's busting out stats.
  8. Crazy to read this. Just a month ago there were very few people with me on the "Bears WRs are pretty good, just unproven" bandwagon. I also say pass to TO, but not because we couldn't use a stud WR. After seeing him play a few games in Buffalo, I just think that he may not be the stud WR any more.
  9. jason

    OMFG

    What's more hilarious is your apparent lack of football knowledge.
  10. You got the part about the media right. I swear it's a conspiracy at times. Even the stinking ticker at the bottom of ESPN always seems to get cut off for a commercial RIGHT when the Bears are about to be shown.
  11. Meh. As long as it's not a Bears player.
  12. Very impressive stat. The odd thing is, it doesn't feel like he has dominated like the other names on the list. I think it probably has to do with Lovie's passive style of coaching and the manner in which the Bears have employed his strategies with the passive cover-2.
  13. My thoughts almost exactly. Hate list: First the packers, then farv, then the vikings
  14. voted twice...and Knox should have won once by now. No way Sanchez deserves it all three weeks.
  15. jason

    OMFG

    Way to conveniently forget the down and situation. Down, distance, situation. Of the three, only the distance is the same. The down is important because on 3rd, a team is much more locked into a run because a QB can't throw the ball away on a passing play that doesn't work. That's why the run happens so often, and why the unorthodox pass surprises the defense so much. The situation is also important. In this case, the Bears already ran two play-action, QB roll outs for short TD passes to the TE, so the situation made it difficult for Detroit to determine what the play would be.
  16. And this game is why I'm extra bugged about the game against Green Bay. This should have made GB 1-3, and feeling horrible about being tied with the Lions. Instead, they're 2-2 and they think they have a shot at the division. I no longer like Green Bay and Minnesota games. It used to be easy because I hated Green Bay and Brett Favre. Now, I'm torn.
  17. Agreed. Better, but not preferred over simply starting well.
  18. I don't love it. The reason why is simple: Sometimes those first few punches you don't answer can end the fight. There should be no surprise about being in a fight.
  19. jason

    OMFG

    Down, distance, and situation. Down, distance, and situation. When the runs up the gut with Wolfe were called, the defense had a lot more to worry about, and had to respect the passing game. Not only that, but Detroit's defense is not good at all. It's completely different than running out of your own goal against the Minnesota wall of fat.
  20. I'm not angry, but I can't fathom why you don't seem to understand the difference between "that play is bad" and "that play is bad in that situation." I'm actually pretty psyched about the win...the Bears don't score like that normally. Cutler is really proving to be worth the deal.
  21. Look at it this way genius... Did the Bears score? Yes. Therefore, the Lions have to expect that the Bears were planning on going for the TD, and not kneeling on the ball. Did the Bears have two similar situations earlier, in which Jay Cutler faked the run and rolled out for the easy pass to the TE? Yes. Therefore, the defense doesn't know what to expect, and has to respect the possibility of a play action roll out. Also, it was on first down. If Cutler were to roll out and nothing is there, he can throw it away. Therefore, it can be a run or a pass (with a safety net). If it's a third down and one, then the safety net is no longer there for the QB, and the likelihood of it being a run is much greater. Really, do you not understand this basic philosophy of offensive football?
  22. I knew you would post that nonsense...which is why I already made the comment about down and distance. It's not the call, it's the situation and the call. Wolfe up the gut on 3rd and 1? Bad call because the D is expecting a run. Wolfe up the gut on 2nd and 9? Good call because the D doesn't know what to expect. The play doesn't exist in a vaccuum.
  23. BTW - Both Wolfe runs were on plays in which it was unclear what the Bears would do. 2nd and 9 looks like a passing down most of the time. And 1st and goal is a crapshoot, especially considering the two TDs Cutler has today on play-action, roll-out plays.
  24. Wolfe! That was a nasty cut in the hole.
×
×
  • Create New...