Jump to content

jason

Super Fans
  • Posts

    8,705
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jason

  1. I'm torn on nearly the same idea. I feel there are several intriguing mid/late round QB prospects, and this year presents a perfect opportunity for such a consideration because the top guys are not rated as high as they will likely go. On top of that, Glennon's contract says he's the guaranteed starter for at least the first year, so it makes less sense to draft a QB early. Otherwise, why pick up Glennon at all? The Bears' front office believes Glennon has the potential do be good, otherwise they would have stayed with someone like Hoyer or Barkley and drafted a QB high.
  2. I'd have to see who was still there, but Id love to see Ramczyk on the Bears.
  3. FWIW - I'd probably do the following (without the possibility of trade-downs, which I'd prefer), which is almost entirely a boom or bust draft: 1. Jonathan Allen, DE - Shoulder history or not, it didn't affect him when he beat down offensive linemen. 2. DeShone Kizer, QB, Notre Dame - I think he slips. Too good to pass. 3. Joe Mixon, RB, Oklahoma - It wouldn't be popular, and I don't want to get into politics, but I'd pick him here. Huge value. 4. Julie'n Davenport, OT, Bucknell - His measurables are too good to pass up. 4. Jordan Leggett, TE, Clemson - Really don't understand why he seems to be slotted here. He's a stud. 5. Chad Kelly, QB, Ole Miss - Yes, double-dipping on QB. Kelly is 1st round talent. If he screws up 7. BPA
  4. Agree 100%. I'm not normally an optimist with the Bears - been a fan too long - but for some reason I see good things in the future for this WR group.
  5. I hate it because of the start. 1. Why sign a FA TE and have Miller only to put them on the bench for a 1st rounder who is in quite possibly the deepest TE draft in decades? 2. Why sign a fairly deep/experienced group of WRs if the intention is to use a 2nd rounder on a WR? Not only that, but I am not sold on JJSS. He doesn't appear to have the explosiveness to get away from DBs, most of his TDs came against bad teams, and he doesn't seem to produce against really good teams. 3. Webb has only played in gimmick offenses designed to exploit college defenses that rarely translate to the NFL. He's probably the QB I like the least in the top 7-8 QBs.
  6. I know there are varying opinions on whether the Bears should spend the #3 pick on a QB. I also know there are a ton of mocks that have the QBs going all over the place. Often I've seen a "top 3" QB drop into the second round. Assuming the Bears pass on QB in the 1st, and one of the top 3 QBs slide, is it a guarantee that the Bears pick said QB if he fell to them? If somehow Trubisky (highly unlikely), Watson (unlikely), or Kizer (fairly unlikely) fell to the Bears in the 2nd round, I think it's a 100% guarantee that the Bears would have to draft said QB. Agree?
  7. First of all, the Bears staff knows more about the health of Kevin White than anyone else. So I'll hope for now he's healthy. If so, the Bears suddenly have turned a position of question into a position of perceived strength. -White (6'3", 216lbs) will be presumably be the split end (X). He's big enough and fast enough to shake off press coverage from the line. He's also the most athletic, and the guy who likely gets the one on one ball when Glennon is under fire. -Wright (5'10, 191lbs) seems perfectly suited for the slot (Y). When he was under Loggains in TN, he worked slot and put up 94 catches for over 1000 yards. That likely gives him the leg up in the slot position. -Meredith (6'3", 207lbs) had production last year that can't be ignored. He'll likely play the flanker (Z) role, getting in motion off the line, attempting to work various routes with his 4.42 speed and good change of direction. That leaves Wheaton (5'11, 189lbs) as the viable starter, but odd man out in my opinion. He mostly worked slot with Pittsburgh, but I can't see him beating out Wright because of the previous production and familiarity with Loggains. Wheaton could potentially also fill in at the Z, but Meredith likely has the initial starting nod. All that said, I think the Bears have a very solid group of WRs providing there are not a rash of injuries.
  8. jason

    Solomon Thomas

    I agree, except for the Safety. I'm guessing you were thinking of Adams or Hooker, and associated him with Eric Reid of the Niners?
  9. Yeah, this one was easy. Cheap player, busts his butt on special teams, and does an OK job when filling in at LB.
  10. jason

    Solomon Thomas

    Yes. I think it has to constantly be in Pace's mind. Which is why I'm fully prepared to be upset during the first round of the draft. Allen is who I want, not who I think Pace will pick.
  11. We are pretty much on the same sheet. I figure Whitehair at C is an A-, and Leno at T is a D+ or C-. If Grasu and Whitehair can be a C+ or B- at C and T, respectively, the overall net gain isn't much, but the consistency improves.
  12. Nice! I don't know how I feel about Webb in the 5th being the potential successor to glennon, but if the rest pans out it might not matter.
  13. jason

    Solomon Thomas

    It's definitely closer than I realized in terms of stats. I admit to a SEC bias given my geography, but I watched a few Stanford games and was never wowed by Thomas. Plus, the SEC competition is just overall better, IMO. And while they may be popularity contests, Allen won a slew of awards.
  14. I think Whitehair would be better than Leno on the first snap.
  15. I've been saying the same thing for a while. If Grasu is better at C than Leno is at T, it's a good move. The fact that Whitehair played T in college makes the move even easier. And since Whitehair adjusted so quickly to a new position, as a rookie in the NFL, it gives a lot of confidence that he'd make just great of a transition out to his natural position.
  16. jason

    Zach Miller.....

    I would absolutely HAAAAATE an OJ Howard pick, because it would require a late first rounder or early second rounder. TE is not that big of a position of need or impact. On top of that, the Bears need far more players at other positions. And this is a crazy deep TE draft, which would make the pick that much worse.
  17. jason

    Solomon Thomas

    Every year the draft process produces a guy who goes from really good to great, for no other reason than people harping on tape or blowing a gasket about the combine. The simple fact is, Thomas didn't produce as well as Allen, and didn't look as good as Allen. If Garrett is gone - I'm hoping Mongo is right and Cleveland screws the pooch - then the only 3-4DE that's worth the #3 pick is Allen. Otherwise, it should be a S, QB, or trade.
  18. Dude. Did Forte have more rushing yards or not?
  19. The Bears have a lot of cash left and the choices are dwindling. WR is a huge need. Why aren't the Bears linked to Michael Floyd? I'd love to see him replace Jeffery.
  20. Forte had 1900 yards and 12 TDs! What's so difficult to get about that? That's definitely better than Howard's rookie season.
  21. What are you talking about? He went for over 800 yards rushing, over a 1000 all purpose yards, and 8 TDs on one of the worst offenses in the NFL. It's more likely he would have had a resurgent year if he stayed with the Bears, because their stats on runs up the middle were greatly improved with the addition of Whitehair.
  22. Money was not mentioned. The fact is, an unknown can't be used to prove a point, and Forte did ha se a better year once.
  23. Incorrect. He actually had a better year.
×
×
  • Create New...