Jump to content

killakrzydav

Super Fans
  • Posts

    1,788
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by killakrzydav

  1. You mean besides the two yearly guaranteed losses to the Pack correct?
  2. I just don't see Watson lasting until our second pick. I'd rather not try to win a 31 team parlay. Too many teams need a QB.
  3. Obviously not. My point is none of the top three last to our second pick. But there will be Clev, Nyj, SD, Jax, SF, Hou, NO, Buf, Ari, and possibly Minnesota looking for a qb in this year's draft. Do you really think we can hope our guy is there when we pick in the second round or later? Or would you rather have a well put together team with no qb like Houston that can win a few games but can't advance due to shoddy qb play?
  4. Fox won't be fired. Realistically, he knew the hand he was dealt and I think they brought him in for a long term build with some stability. It would be nice to keep Fandigo but as soon as we start winning, he will be plucked for a head coaching gig.
  5. Either way we see it, we've fallen so far off. hosed up thing is I don't think we've bottomed out yet either. I want a reason to not be cheering for losses again. Find the best QB in this draft for our team going forward and take him at three. Build around Howard, qb, keep Jeffery even if you have to tag him, and dump money and draft picks into our offensive line.
  6. I'm a Watson guy. Just take him at three so we can mentally start over from this fuckery we've been dealing with since we fired Lovie. I just realized how far we've fallen since we fired a guy who lead us to a 10-6 record in his final year. Yikes!
  7. I'd rather trade with Tennessee for their #6 & #16 giving back our third and second fourth round selection. Then I'd take Watson at six and Teez, Wilson, or Reid at 16. In the second I'd hope Howard is still there and if not go best offensive tackle available. People who keep saying draft a Qb prospect in the latter rounds might as well not want a QB as the majority of starter quality picks are first round draft picks.
  8. Kaaya is straight garbage. As for Allen, I could see some people rate him high but in the games I've watched I've been unimpressed with his accuracy.
  9. I saw on NFL. Com this morning that we could still get the number two pick if SF somehow beat Seattle and we love to Minnesota.
  10. I'd have to second that sentiment Mongo. What a weird thought process.
  11. I think unless Garrett is there it has to be a QB. Watson, Mitch, or the ND bum. I don't see another QB flying up the board but nobody saw Wentz going number two at this time last year either.
  12. He's a FA so unless he's tagged I'm willing to break the bank for him. If tagged, I'd rather not give up our top six pick for this year but would if needed.
  13. SF with the come back win!. Is the number two pick a possibility with another SF win next week?
  14. I'd rather have Pryor than Jeffery. Both would be nice though. Id buy a LT, CB, and wr.
  15. No, not one though I didn't know Hicks had that many sacks.
  16. Honestly, I'm not even sure if any of those games are a one score game
  17. I really have never bought into Jeffrey being a top ten receiver. It just seems too be about twenty receivers who are better than him. I'm not opposed to franchising him nor am I opposed to trading him. I'd try for a second or top of the third and cut bait. Wr needs to be addressed soon
  18. Sorry for the jacked up link. It was to CBS and yes it was Bill Polian
×
×
  • Create New...