Stinger226

I know its hard to due but we need to look to the future, not a broke QB with little good history.

Curtis Lofton expected to be cut from NO. Pace knows him, had 144 tackles last year. Another option with ties to the new leaders.

With Pace and Fox looking at tape from last year, they could have physically gotten ill from what they had to watch. IF they add several LBs then we have to assume they seen no valve in what we have, If they add very little, then they see players ascending. The point is, we assume the coaches was a big reason they didnt play well, the fact is they may not be any good no matter we assume. We have no idea what they think of any players, so they actions will show that very quickly. The attractive thing with Michael Wilhoite, Fangio knows what he is, not a star but was a starter on a very good defense, his valve has upside you can measure and will come cheap. This is a tight lipped regime, we will soon find out what they think.

this all could fall together quite nicely.

That would a great deal for us. Get a starter with a 6th round pick, that is familiar with the coach. We would be getting him on a cheap deal also.

I agree, he may be sly smart, they get Marriotta, draft a RB and win a SB, or not.

Im not sure hanging there hat on Cassel is going to get them to a super bowl, but definitely better than what they have.

I think, as always it comes down to money and years .

Just shows you how rumors take on a life of there own. It has been discussed but not initiated. May happen, but odds it isnt.

you wrecked my whole post, I forgot the rookie pool money,(see you are one of the smart ones)Im not

Ok all the smart people on here, be the GM: you get one expensive contract 10 mil a year (that means Suh is not on your list) you get one 6-7 mil contract 3= 3-4 mil contracts 3= 1-2 mil contracts BE REALISTIC and then do your draft FAs: Randall Cobb 10 mil Orlando Franklin 6 mil Jared Odrick/DE 4 mil Rahim Moore/FS 4 mil Cris Culliver/CB 4 mil Mark Ingram/RB 2 mil Nate Irving/ILB 2 mil Virgil Green/TE 1 mil we pick up extra money by cutting BM Draft: #1 Mariotta is available and we trade back with ST Louis to #10 and get an extra 3 and 5 WE select Bud Dupree/OLB #2 Karl Davis/DT/DE Iowa #3a Anthony Harris/SS/Virg #3b Ty Montgomery/WR/Stanford #4 Harry Anderson/DE/Stanford #5 Garret Grayson/QB/CSU #6 BJ Kinney/C/Kansas State #7 Josh Crokett/RB/NDS Offensively we have a QB prospect Grayson Ingram,Forte and Carey at RB BM gone so we got Cobb and drafted Montgomery Green for a backup TE Franklin and a center prospect in Kinney defensively we have Davis and Anderson, Ordick for the line. LBs Irving and Dupree CB Culliver Ss Moore and Harris Your turn

We need to get younger not older. More expensive, and if we add a WR he needs to give us speed. Last year defenses could play us underneath with no speed WR to take the top off.

Those are all good names. The only big contract I would like to see is Randall Cobb. Not likely but adds a whole different dimension to our offense and weakens GB. Other wise I would like to see Moore/FS, Cox/CB, Odrick/DE,and would love to get Franklin to pair with Long to anchor our OL for years to come.

He has 93 tackles and 16.5 sacks in 3 years, thats not pro bowl stats. I would say as high of a pick as he was, he is on the low side of his expectations.

There goes the Forte trade down the drain.

As somebody suggested, if BM goes, we could use a speed guy as a #2 and still grab a slot WR, someone like Beasley from Dallas.

There are lots more players being released that has game. I wonder if we grab some older pros or stick to the youth movement I expect them to adhere to. I think if there is a few leader type pros, maybe we sign a couple of guys over 30 to fed the new culture they with to establish.

If Fowler or Gregory is there, they will be our selection.

That is a good point, NE is good because of Brady, and they add so many players they are bound to hit on them. Seattle is another team that has tons of players go thru the door and find gems along the way.

There are 3 teams that draft well year in and year out, Balt,NE and GB. Anybody want to go back and re think HaHa Dix?

Was looking at SF NTs for the last 3 years 6-5 318,6-1 297, 6-1 305 Fangios NTs dont fit the big fat guy in the middle like the typical 3-4 scheme does. That is why I am positive Shelton will not be our 7th pick. If we drop down several spots his valve will change.

We have to quit that shit and build for a continued winner and that may take a few years but lets be like GB and hone our own draftees and cut back on the fix this year player.

I think both of those players will be tagged, after the tags are applied the market will get thinner.

The thing that bothers me about Beasley is the 34 tackles, not what gret players show for a stat line.

Your right about that , I have a tendency to view how they rank the player board more than the mock.