Jump to content

Stinger226

Super Fans
  • Posts

    13,063
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Stinger226

  1. Here is a draft from Windy city gridiron. I love the first 3 but will the lose of picks, it would end up being not good. No RB prospect(a must) , QB prospect( not of great impotance), and not enough bodies for the youth movement. http://www.chatsports.com/chicago-bears/a/...ft-40-2-9753505
  2. Having that situation would be unique but as the draft as shown,all the good Ss are gone. Two good prospects in the line probably bodes well over all, but failing to get a starting safety would not be a good thing.
  3. Why do you dislike Miller? I think he's pretty sharp. Two years ago , he rated Jeffery as the top WR, and guess what-he was right.
  4. Its time for the Cardinals to pick: Austin Seferian-Jenkins TE. they need help along the front line, but Austin is to good to pass up at this point of the draft. Jason and the Puckers are on the clock.
  5. Way to go ,, that was my next pick wieniey. So now Dallas has to go with bucannon/ S . Somebody is on the clock
  6. I wouldn't bet on it, being a stud athlete, often turns into a roster cut. Players usually show progress, haven't seen any
  7. With all the crap that floats around the NFL, this is chum change.
  8. He had a lot of those moments.
  9. Jernigan, is a good valve at this spot of the draft, and its Lovie, defense, defense defense.
  10. Draft gurus are all over the place after the first 10 to 15 players, so there is no certainty on picks. Does anybody believe Kyle Long was a first round pick, until we made him one. Hell no. After the first round, GMs draft according to their board, not mock drafts. I have a tendency to like the ex scouts, and what they have to say. Draft sites like, GBNF,Our lads, Draft countdown. I also like Matt Millers opinions. And all of these are wrong most of the time. I think the ones that tell you who the top 30 are, not necessarily to the right teams, are the smart ones. Early second isnt considered a good valve, but I think he will be a very good player. If he becomes a strarter in the NFL and is above average in his play, that's not to early.
  11. There are a few spots they need to fill, but they need to replace an all pro TE so they go with Jake Amaro/TE. Its an offensive league and no valve at there other areas of need. We have the evil Tampa Bay up next and that would be ADAM
  12. Cleveland takes J Ward to replace the other Ward. Oakland (Jason) are now on the clock.......
  13. I suspect your right, its a contract year so we will see the hustling Briggs that wants a new contract.
  14. He had minor injuries so I dont think that will come into play, but you do make a good point. Where our conflict comes into play, is I think Bostic ends up in Briggs spot and flourishes there. The scenario comes into to play, that could be this year.Briggs has a lingering issue, 6 months after the fact. He was cleared to play,but he was invisible.
  15. I have a strong desire for Pryor and have been pining for him for some time, but I see an all pro MLB type making an impact on our team, and we can still get Ward or Bucannon in the second. I think all four of them are starters the first year, at least on this team. If we go by best player available, I honestly think Haha and Donald are already gone, so he could arguably be the best defensive player on the board. I think Gilbert will be a good player, but dont think he will be the stud play maker everybody projects him to be.
  16. They need help at MLB but not any good valves at this spot. Fagency fixed many problems, so they replace Beadles with Xavier Su'a-Filo/OG. Denver takes the OG with an attitude.They have to protect Payton for one more year. Jason is up.
  17. I guarantee you, Mosely will have a impact over any CB drafted on our team THIS year. A CB will see some time but will not be playing ahead of Tillman or Jennings.
  18. Im with Donald, but I know he wont be there. either safety or I want Mosely, he is a stud LB, will enhance any team he goes too. Why CB when you have been selling the depth theory? So if Greene, Bostic and SCM are our LBers , your good with that? Briggs has issues, Williams is an injury waiting to happen. I think Mosely is a potential, all star type LB, only Bostic has any inclination of that happening and that will be at Briggs spot.
  19. When I stated little depth for LB I should have unproven. Briggs, is a staple IF HEALTHY, and with Williams, and Bostic and SCM for the sam , were ok. but that all falls to shit,if Williams gets hurt again(hasnt played a full season since 2010)., and Briggs never recovers from the surgery he had last year. I suppose if we do draft Mosely, if will tell us that the Briggs situation is more questionably than we thought.
  20. I see that happening, a player that is rated around here with great upside, is exactly things that they do.
  21. I think they cover everything. The way I look at it: If the season started today, do we have decent starters at every position? We have our CBs back that started the last few years. Are they old and have injuries questions, of course, but if the season started today we have competence at all positions. S? we brought in a few people, as of today our starters would be Conte(coming back from injury) and Mundy at the SS position. I think we need a starter here, if Conte comes back strong, we might be ok, but we cant answer that. One S needs to be added to the mix that could start. DE- we have starters and depth, so would not need to address this position at all. DT- we have starters and little depth. We definitely need to add here.I think the age and injury concerns makes this a strong consideration everywhere in the draft. LB- We have starters but little depth, we have to add here. We have an aging former all pro,who's a pud, but when good on the field is a big contributer. He is not all the way back from injury which could change everything we do. So we need a high round pick at S,DT,CB, and LB. I think we take the best players on the board that fills those needs. S-HaHa,Pryor,Ward, and Pryor are the only potenial first day starter in the draft. I would like one of them, which would have to be in the first two rounds. DT- There is some depth in the draft here so in any of the first 4 rounds , I would be ok with who ever we got. CB- We need to add youth and depth, as SCS as stated, there is depth at this position, so we could get prospects anywhere in the first 5 rounds. LB- We only need a MLB prospect because I believe our starters at the OLB spots are on the team. This is marginal but we could get a potenial starter thru the first 4 rounds. If Donald is there, I think that is our choice. Personally I think he will be gone. Everybody else in the league sees what we see. I think our first pick will be a S or Mosely. Why I keep bringing up MLB spot is , he would start from day one and be a leader and take us into the next Bears LB to fuss over. 1-Mosely/LB So at two we take Ward or Bucannon. 3rd with the depth at CB I think we grab our DT here, names to consider Quarles,Ferguson,Jones, Johnson. 4th- here is where we grab a CB-Desir is a name that keeps coming up, also Gaines, Reynolds,Huff, Exum 5th-we grab a RB, names to look at White,Johnson,Grice, or Crowell 6th round gets us QB and TE prospects, I like Wennings and Lyerla here. Mosely ends up being our suprise pick of which Im sure most dont agree with, but I will grow to love it as will you.
  22. Sorry to be late to the party but I had a date tonight.(actually I like vaginas better than this) but not by much. Cleveland takes Bridgewater/QB Waiting until now paid off, I got my QB here. New Orleans is up for drafting.SCS
  23. That replaces Johnson for them, that makes sense.
  24. To make that move it would cost more than that. If there is action on Donald, we wont be the only ones going after that pick or another and exchanging a 3 and 5 is chum change.
×
×
  • Create New...