Everything posted by Stinger226
-
My plan for the draft
I would love one of them two in the first I dont think watson will be there in the second Kelly in the third would be more realistic I would love to get a OT high, but doubt if Roberson or the Wisconsin LT would be there in the second. Have to get a FS with play making ability. Its a must.
-
Draft Philosophy Question
If we go by your theory, Watson wont be there because everyone is trading up to get a QB. Also we give the 6th pic away, and our 2 4ths away to get a high second? that doesnt seem very smart of a deal.
-
QB options
They would taje BPA then naybe trade but no rb
-
QB options
They have hyde and no qb, why would they do that
-
QB options
So are you saying we should draft a RB?, I dont think that is a glaring need for us. Before I would do that I would reach for a LT than none are rated top 10 this year but would fix a glaring need.
-
QB options
I agree, there is no FA options, but if they think one of this years QBs are capable of being a Franchise QB then take him, but dont draft a high risk player at 3 because people expect you to do that. Take him if you want him , draft the BPA if you dont think there worth it.
-
Let's play an offseason game
I think bush ends up becoming the starter at SS, but the problem is it may not be this year..
-
Both Coordinators Retained
I have heard rumors that McCoy(long time aide to Fox) could come here as the Assistant head coach. Do the play calling and still retain Loggians as OC with a lesser role. Why would McCoy do that? At Foxes age, he may turn the reigns to the team over to McCoy when his contract is up, and maybe Pace would agree with that depending on the success of the team until then. McCoy is viewed as a good offensive mind but has had the same problems that we have had here with many injuries and a poor defense. with Fangio here, the defense will become good if not great so it may we a great scenario for everybody involved.
-
Jamal Adams
your right, I didnt notice. I guess as long as you figured out what I meant, it doesnt really matter
-
Let's play an offseason game
We have two new CBs and the best FS in the game add a LT that can start from day one a legit TE a sleeper QB prospect Short will make our front 7 one of the top 7 in the league.
-
QB options
His stats dont set you on fire, but I have heard 3 NFL scouts say he has many traits to be a NFL starter. Nobody saying he is a franchise type but may be a good valve in the 4th or 5th.
-
Jamal Adams
I think he is a very good player, if we trade back and get some extra picks he would be a good valve
-
Draft Sleepers
Lorenzo Jerome, S, Saint Francis (PA) he had 12 int and 24 PBUs over the last 3 years.
-
Let's play an offseason game
Cyprien? we need play makers, he has had two interceptions in 4 years. We can do better than that. Gilmore is quite the stud, 30 PDs and 8 int in the last two years. Allen would be great but didnt draft a QB, that will not happen this year.
-
QB options
From everything Im reading is this class is below average and have yet to here anybody call the top 3 a franchise quarterback. just because you draft a 2nd round rated QB higher doesnt make him a first round franchise QB. You are right most franchise QBs are drafted high, but they come out with fanfare, Manning, Luck, Ben Roethlisberger. QBs starting not in the first round. Dalton, 2nd round Wilson 3rd round Brady 6 th round Brees 2nd round Cousins 4 th round Tyrod Taylor 6 th round I am not going to list all the idiots around that have started some games because of injuries. More starters are found in the first round but also more misses. You can find them in other spots.
-
Just say no
For me it is less risk than grabbing a guy high in the draft, he has been in the NFL learning under Brady and Bellick, seems like our best option. If he is good, it will show quicker, any of the draftees will take a couple of years even if you have a gem. Wentz and Zak didnt have franchise type years, just good for a rookie. Either would not have did as well if they were on our team for the whole year. I just looked at Zaks stats, 4 interceptions and 6 rushing TDs, I am quite impressed.
-
QB options
I dont serious think they draft a QB at 3. That is the best way to lose your job, make a mistake at the top of the draft. Draft the best player available and then look at whats left, reaching for a top QB that high is dumb. I have heard several people mention C.J. Beathard as a possible middle round prospect that could hit. His college career hasnt shined because of poor peers around him. Anybody know more about him?
-
Let's play an offseason game
- QB options
Our options: not much in FAgency trade for one, Jimmy G. or Glennon? keep Cutler another year? ( that boat has sailed) draft one high? ( none rated for the third overall pick) draft one later and try to develop? probably our only option. Hoyer will be our bridge , but we have to have a prospect to develop Does anyone think Connor Shaw has a future?- POLL: What should Bears do at #3
we like mocks that follow our line of thinking, truth is, 95% of mocks are wrong I do not think I seen one mock last year that had us taking Floyd.- POLL: What should Bears do at #3
Actually Miller is good at what he does evaluating players , hes just throwing a bone out there. First of all the guy has said he is not coming out, secondly, he has all the measurable s but needs more experience.- Prospect Rankings Changing
With Cleveland and SF in front with both QB needs plus, Houston,Denver,Buffalo, Jets,all could try to trade up to get one, we are sitting pretty to get Garrett or Allen my preferred choice.- Chicago getting disrespected
We get what we deserve, 1 playoff in 10 years- QB options
He woll get what the market bears, dont think he will big money since he hasn't been playing.- With the 3rd pick in the 2017 NFL draft ...
Peppers is supposed to be a stud but production didnt show that, more of a SS. I think FS would be a better game changer position - QB options