DABEARSDABOMB

Papa Shanny has indicated that it won't be until after they were eliminated. I didn't know you could force a team to wait. I'm guessing Papa wouldn't force anyone other then his son to wait (and I'm guessing his son is okay with that cause he's young and knows he will get a shot eventually).

I think Trestman is a guy I wanted the Bears to interview back when they were hiring Lovie (IIRC).

Its been quite a while outside of major football for him. I'd think at some point he'd realize his best shot is coming back to the NFL. I saw an article on soxtalk (I'm guessing maybe you posted it) and the article was talking about him as a head coach but was dated back in 09. He's been out of this league for a while. To hire him as a HC would be a joke in my mind. That isn't to say he doesn't have qualifications but after not interviewing some of the better proven candidates to then pull this out of your ass would just disgust me. I'm going to be irritated if we don't interview Shanny. I want McCoy, Shanny or Sullivan if we are going for a coordinator.

But you wonder how being near the crap that was Carimi and company impacts Louis production. Was he average because he was busy covering up for the others (and if he had average guys around him he'd have even been better?). Not sure but all I know Louis looked pretty damn good based upon my eyes.

Pretty darn good OC as well. That said, I hope they are looking at him more as a lets get to know you because we think whomever our HC is might want to hire your as the OC.

I can buy Sullivan as a good hire.

Sullivan did some nice things with the bucs offense this year and got a lot of credit regarding Eli's development from his time in San Fran. He was only an OC for a short time but seems like a very bright mind.

Reports that Chip Kelly is set to become the Browns next head coach. ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet BREAKING: Chip Kelly is close to a deal to become the #Browns coach, according to a source informed of his situation.

@MikeGarafolo Sounds like Mike Sullivan and the Bears had a very good meeting the other day. Went six hours, about twice as long as expected.

You can cross Ron Turner off the list. He took a job to be the head coach of Florida Atlantic. Was working with Josh Freeman in Tampa previously.

I think the plan for Shea is to be a DE. I don't think there is any trick up the sleeve but all of that could change. Ultimately it comes down to whomever the new DC is (if any). If it is a new DC maybe they will see Shea differently. I also don't believe that lovie/Shea disagreed on Shea. If that was the case, something would have came out. Lovie loves speed rushers and he got that. I would be stunned if he had major issues with the drafting of Shea (and that Emery would have forced it on him). I do agree that it could make sense to resign Urlacher (if the Bears think he can be at least average to slightly above average). This assumes the price is right but it allows the Bears to address other more important needs and lets you wait another year on MLB. That said, it could all be a moot point as everything is very dependent on whom our coach is (and then in turn, who the DC is). If Marinelli stays (and I think its 50/50) then it is more likely that Urlacher would stick around, imo.

I'm thinking we probably won't hear about whether the Bears consider Toub or not. My guess is they'd want to stay quiet regarding such. I expect the same for any candidate who is not under contract (e.g., Reid or Holmgren) or any college coaches. I say that because any of these assistants, there is a formal process in place, which means it will definitely be leaked. That said, you probably don't call a Holmgren unless you legitimately think you are willing to hire him and pay him if you like what you hear.

I agree, however, I will say that there is something about O'Brien that is different. He isn't a smug, arrogant jackass, which is something I can't say about some of the other Belliceck guys (specifically Weiss, Pioli, and McDaniels). However, I don't necessarily have a problem looking at the failures and deciding you want no part with O'Brien(e.g., Crennell, the other Jets coach whose name escapes me that is now an ESPN commentator, Weiss, and McDaniels), however, you should at least have the conversation. He seems like such a great candidate. Classy face of an organization (potential for at least) with a brilliant offensive mind and the ability to handle adversity (did a great job despite all of the stuff swirling around PSU).

Pioli will be fired, which makes sense. He is/was a disaster as a GM.

His defenses tend to be elite. I'm very interested in O'Brien. Well respected, knows offenses, and showed a hell of a lot in how he handled and coached the PSU team this past year. I think he would be an exceptional get. Albeit I think he'd be a very difficult guy to hire.

Fair points. I can't disagree with any of the above.

Fewell was the one guy the Bears looked at for a DC (a couple years back) outside of Marinelli that I would have been excited about. He did a nice job for the Bills in the interim role and I'd be on board with bringing him. The key to me is if you interview him, what/whom is he looking at in terms of offensive assistants.

Not sure how he's producing at this stage of his career, but he'd be a nice pick-up.

Doesn't take away from the job he's done, however, one damning stat was how they were the most penalized team in the SEC. That said, they might also be one of the youngest teams in the SEC for all I know (which could explain the higher penalties).

Urlacher was a special athlete and it would have been interesting to see him in a more attacking offense, however, this defense is not fast anymore. Dline has some speed but Urlacher isn't fast anymore and I don't know that i'd ever characterize Briggs as a speedster (hell of a LB though). But I also have a hard time arguing against the cover 2, especially given the successes of this defense under Marinelli. Really the only time the Cover 2 struggled was when Babich was calling the shots. Under Marinelli and Rivera, it was quite good. Probably because it wasn't a vanilla cover 2 under either of them (they ran it with wrinkles where Babich was very very vanilla).

I thought Brees and Carmichael worked together at San Diego as well. Regarding Arians, he clearly did a good job and changed the perception. I guess entering this year he was looked at as a career assistant and that his personality didn't fit a head coach. He clearly knows offenses though. Regarding McCoy, he's worked under Fox (who is a really good coach) and really has understood quite a bit. He made Delhomme look good and did a lot with Orton. Very personable, willing to change and adapt, has been quoted about how it is important to understand what your players do well and to adjust to that. Seems like a good fit but I definitely can see your arguments. I really wonder though if Thomas was more talking about the fact that in the offense with Tebow he couldn't really figure out what the hell was going on so there weren't really routes.

Normally if you hire an offensive head coach, he's going to hire a guy he is comfortable and let that guy run the system. They might have a preference to one system or another but in many instances they may have worked with teams that have ran both types of defenses and thus have contacts that have ran both. I'd have a hard time seeing an offensive coach completely change the teams defensive structure given how the defense has performed. That said, they very well might not want to keep Marinelli around and it is their right to bring in their guys but if the Bears hire an offensive coach I'd put the odds as pretty good that they would be comfortable running a similar system to what Lovie did.

Guys that if you were the GM, you'd have to interview (and would be disappointed if Emery didn't). For me it is as follows: Mike Holmgren (my top choice) Andy Reid Bill O'Brien Mike McCoy Shanny Gruden Note: I'd have to at least put in a couple calls to Cowher's agent as well to see if there was any interest.

That stat probably has more to do with the fact that A) It is really really hard to win a superbowl and not too many superbowl coaches go on to coach many other places so the odds are extremely against it. I do know Holmgren has made the superbowl with 2 different teams.

Why is everyone ready to move away from the 4-3 cover 2 defense. I don't get it. This defense is good. If we are hiring an offensive coach and have the right personell for the 4-3 and run it well (and for all I know Marinelli will stick around and he's proven to be a very very good DC), then what is the hurry in switching to the 3-4. There are plenty of 3-4 defenses that totally suck. This defense is good...I see why we want to fix the offense but see no reason to fix the D (other then continuing to try and find new talent so that the D can get younger).