Jump to content

DABEARSDABOMB

Admin
  • Posts

    7,332
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DABEARSDABOMB

  1. I'm not going to lie - I would trade Mack if I could and take the draft picks. Not denying that Mack isn't a really good player - but his entire career he has failed to really ever be a true difference maker (sans that 1st season with the Bears and even in that season, when push came to shove, he faded down the stretch).
  2. Yeah - they are going back to QB well and if there is one thing that we've learned - the best QB doesn't always go first, so you never know - picking (hopefully) later in the 1st shouldn't necessarily prevent the team from finding an awesome QB. I say - Bears might have been lucky in the sense that they got a clear answer on Mitch vs. the Texans who just paid Watson a massive amount of money.
  3. That td pass to Miller for the win was money. Mitch doenst make that play. Foles took the hit and delivered. Foles had some lousy throws and a bit of luck but he also is just so calm out there.
  4. Yeah - they were really bad - in the end though - crazy fun win. Huge game by Foles and defense awoke in 2nd half. Pass rush was actually good too - which was nice. Too many penalties though. Foles is not a great QB but he is a better QB than Mitch and can read the defense and actually made some downfield plays, which was huge and should open things up a lot for the rushing game etc. Robinson and Miller both need to come down with those TDs.
  5. Below is a screenshot of the lowest separation of skill position players through 1st 2 weeks of the season (no qualifiers applied). Bears have 3 of the top 5. I don't know whether the QB decisions play into the separation or if this is a pure stat - but not even the best QB's can consistently deal with this many people NOT getting open. All of these parties need to step it up - the really scary one is Miller - he is supposed to be more electric at getting open; Robinson has always had less separation than the league but made up for it with fundamental awesomeness.
  6. Not sure I would buy into the whole article - but certainly would say it is a positive first two weeks. Mitch has definitely looked better from the eye test, that said, the total score, etc still leaves a lot to be desired. Lets see if he can keep building on this - would be a huge step forward for the franchise if he can turn into a good QB (I'm not even saying great, but good). https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-mitchell-trubiskys-improvement-makes-the-chicago-bears-a-playoff-team
  7. If that is the case - I would actually say that is kind of good news vs. a bigger more fundamental issue. But this was yet another week where the Bears wideouts failed to create much separation.
  8. Anthony Miller wasn't on the field a lot and he graded out as an F from PFF. No matter what the dude flashes - it is pretty evident from his useage that the coaching staff has not faith that he will show up play after play after play. There has to be a lot in the tape that he isn't doing right.
  9. Rumor was they were working to reach a deal with Cohen and Arob before the game - were able to get 1 done but don't know that it means they aren't working pretty quickly on Arob. I have a feeling we see Arob get paid this week.
  10. Very spot on commentary. The one thing I will say is - Mitch made more plays today on 2nd/3rd reads than he did most of last year. He's better - problem is better isn't likely to be good enough. I just don't think that high of Foles that I'd rather see what and how much better Mitch is.
  11. Just want to point out the bolded - a 1 yard sack is better than an incompletion in that situation. Kept the clock rolling. The offense chewed a ton of TOP - but the bottom line is - it didn't score enough. They have to get better, but fact that they've ran the ball better than they have since Nagy took over - that is a HUGE positive.
  12. The Eddie Jackson play was PI. He was there early. We don't like it but it was.
  13. I don't know what throws you were watching, but all I saw were 2 picks thrown by Mitch that shouldn't have been picks. I didn't see him make many bad throws but he played way too conservative in the 2nd half and didn't make enough plays. Period. He had a really strong 1st half though.
  14. Yeah - Consistency of the offense an issue. The good thing is, they have consistently ran the ball well. If they can keep that up and make it an identity of the unit, I expect we'll see the team start to capitalize on that more. There were some real costly drops by Miller (the TD and a separate 3rd down conversion). Not easy catches - but ones he knows he'd like to make. Robinson had a pretty soft game. Will be interesting to see how Mooney responds now that the league is probably getting some footage on him a bit. He's the only explosive wideout this squad has (not counting Ginn) - where he can literally take the top off of the defense.
  15. I keep waiting for them to sign a veteran CB. Our depth at CB seems so thin and unproven. I hope Fuller holds up - this team can not afford an injury to him.
  16. Agree - this is the right move. If the two were even close in training camp - you had to go with Mitch - if somehow he has broken through, it would be huge for the LT implications of the franchise. If he hasn't, you have a guy in Foles who has shown he can come in off the bench and we see if he can right the ship. Either way - if Foles plays most of the season, Bears are looking for a new QB next year. If Trubisky plays the whole year - than it is likely we are having an interesting conversation over the off-season (and a better one than the one we had this off-season). Lets hope Mitch takes a big step forward this year.
  17. Hasn't yet sunk in yet that football is literally days away. Can't wait!
  18. He is eligible to return in week 4 (I think) - Presume Santos will be kicking for us the 1st few weeks, unless they plan to sign someone else. Was interesting how they made all of these moves (cut Cairo but knowing Piniero was going to go on IR). Must have been a cap / flexibility reason for doing it the way they did.
  19. This would be a very nice fit. Certainly a worthwhile depth piece with Goldman out.
  20. I think it will be Trubisky - if for no other reason that you kind of know how Foles will respond as a backup. Further - it still is in the Bears long term interest for Mitch to work. If they were even close in competition, you got to go with the younger guy and that is even more important when you know the other has been a backup before (meaning you know he is better / more apt to accept it). Let Mitch role for a couple games - if it doesn't work, they'll make the move to Nick quick.
  21. 2-4 weeks is definitely better than what some had thought. That said - still a bummer given how crisp and quick he was supposedly looking in practice. Hopefully this ends up being on the shorter end of the recovery and he comes back healthy and hasn't lost that burst he picked up.
  22. This was not a good trade for Seattle. They gave up way too much. I didn't like the Mack trade either, because I similarly thought I much. I just don't believe in trading that many 1st round picks unless you truly believe you are one step away. Seattle is better positioned to make that claim than the Bears were when they made the Mack move. However, I'm also going to state if there was a non QB who you give up that many picks for, it is for an edge rush like Mack.
  23. And Bulls win 2nd bubble - getting surprise push into the NBA playoffs (commish was so impressed that he made a specific rule for them to be included) and Lavine and Mark look like the next Pippen/Jordan and win a shocking championship. DBDB bet $1 which turned into $100B in payout
  24. That is a ton of money but he sure is fun to watch. Who knows, maybe Mitch has a good year, Bears sign him to a reasonable deal and he builds on that good year and ends up being great and one day we all look back and Mahomes was the better player, but Mitch got more rings? I can dream, right?
  25. Isn't this just one of those - it didn't work with them, so while I might think they are solid, etc, too much bad blood for a regroup to happen today. My guess is, Long doesn't trust that if they did bring him back (and to be frank - they probably wouldn't want to anyway), he knows they aren't loyal to him, etc, and he could be right back on the outs again.
×
×
  • Create New...