Jump to content

BearSox

Super Fans
  • Posts

    3,277
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BearSox

  1. He doesn't fit our system.
  2. Okay, I am looking at Scouts Incs top 32 prospects, and it appears we have numerous options coming our way. While I am not saying for a fact any of the following will be available, I think all are at least realistic. I am not listing the following positions, due to either a lack of value near our pick, or I simply do not see the argument for need: QB, RB, TE & LB. But in looking at need, as well as value... OT - Michael Oher - It seems absolutely shocking to list him, but everyone I read, his stock has fallen. I think he was considered for the top pick last year if he would have come out, but has simply watched his stock drop hard. While I have read his talent is w/o question, his motivation is often questions. At the Senior Bowl practices, a perfect example came about. An unknown DE blew his doors off on two consecutive plays, and the coach ripped Oher a new one. After that, Oher dominated. But it was considered further evidence that while Oher has the talent, he lacks the motivation. Most seem to have Andre Smith and Eugene Monroe ranked higher than Oher, while many are also putting Jason Smith ahead. Scouts Inc and McShay has Oher ranked at #20, while Kiper has him around 25. So an OT that seemed WAY out of reach for us at one point, very well could be in reach, but should we be looking at a player that is falling down boards so fast? Oher will be a top 10-15 pick. I'd love it if he fell to us, but right now that's wishful thinking. Of all the top OT's (Monroe, Andre Smith, Jason Smith, and Oher), Jason Smith has the best chance of falling to us, and he's pretty much Chris Williams all over again. WR - Darrius Heyward-Bey - Crabtree was always out of the question, but now it appears we will have no shot at Macklin either. DHB has good size (6'1 206) and is expected to run a sub 4.4 40. He has great speed, and is a big play threat, but I believe there are questions of focus and how developed he is. Raw talent w/ big upside, but unknown how quickly he will transition. Harven seems to be another WR discussed, but I am not sure he offers more than DHB, and comes in at only 5'10. Of all the receivers that might be available or worth the 18 pick, DHB makes the most sense for us. Maybe Britt as well if he REALLY impresses at the combine. OG - Duke Robinson - In truth, he isn't listed in most of the top "big boards" but OGs rarely are. Regardless, I am putting him on the list for us, as I think he is worthy of a mid-late 1st round pick. He is a freak of a stud OG w/ power and quick feet that is amazing. He would likely be an immediate starter inside for us. I would have agreed with you before the NC, but after watching that game, Duke has dropped on my big board. The combine will be huge. DE - Michael Johnson - It looks like this is a class that lacks an elite blue chip, but has numerous red chips. Orakpo is the only DE that seems to be ranked too high for us to reach in most big boards, but after him, there are about 4 DEs who have rankings from just out of the top 10 to high 20s. Aaron Maybin, Everret Brown, Tyson Jackson and Michael Johnson all seem to have value that could place them ahead of our pick, or available. I throw Jackson out because, at nearly 300lbs, he doesn't seem like an ideal fit for our scheme. I think Maybin is very likely to be gone, as he will be considered as a 3-4 LB/DE. That leaves Brown or Johnson. I used Johnson simply because I believe Brown is most likely of the two to be gone, but if it alters opinion, write in Brown instead. I really don't know how the DEs will fall. Michael Johnson is a terrible football player and right now is a round 2-3 prospect. Maybin will be a 3-4 OLB, most likely, and has too many question marks for us to take a chance on. Brown would be a good fit, but he's looking like he'll be off the board come 18. Tyson Jackson makes absolutely ZERO sense, unless Lovie's new scheme has us going to a 3-4. I really like Paul Kruger, but not real sure if he'd fall all the way to our 2nd round pick, but 18 would be to high for him. But he does make sense considering it sounds like we are looking for a future replacement for Ogunleye, and we seem to think Mark Anderson can re-find some of that prior technique he had with Marinelli. Larry English could also be a possibility in the 2nd, while we're on the subject. DT - Sen'Derrick Marks - Raji is a DT many might like too, but his stock seems to be rising to the point he could be closer than not to a top 10 pick. From what I have read, Raji has been dominating at the Senior Bowl as if he were a man among boys. Perry is also listed up there, but does not seem to fit our system. Frankly, I am not sure if Marks does either, but listed him for value sake. Really, the top fit for our system may be Raji, but it simply doesn't appear anymore he will be available. I really wanted B.J. Raji prior to the Senior Bowl, but he is dominating it, and will likely go in the 5-15 range. However, if he's there at 18, we'd be fools not to take him. He doesn't seem to be an ideal fit for the Cover 2 with his size, but his play makes him a perfect fit. He can effectively pass the rusher and stuff the run. Him and Harris would be a fantastic DT duo. Marks makes sense as a cover 2 UT, but UT isn't a need and Marks is a borderline round 1 prospect. Peria Jerry, the DT from Ole Miss, is an ideal fit and UT and is the 2nd best DT in this draft, but like I said, UT isn't a need, at least not right now. CB - Vontae Davis - He may not even make it too us, but for argument sake, I will list him. Decent (not great) size, but great talent. Huge question on him is motivation, as I read he was benched this year at one point "as a wake up call". He's been falling some and could be here for us. But I'm not that high on him, and I think he's lot like his brother (Vernon Davis), a work out warrior, but doesn't play up to his measureables. I wouldn't mind him, but I think there's a better route for us. S - Will Moore - W/ Mays out, it appears Moore has taken over the top S spot. FS w/ size. Neither McShay, nor Kiper, put his value high enough for this spot, but like Duke, I think he is a player who will have middle to late 1st round value. We need a FS, but Moore makes little sense as a Cover 2 FS, and his draft stock has been sinking like a rock. Not only did he have a terrible season, but he's sucked it up at the Senior Bowl. Right now, it looks like Louis Delmas and Rashad Johnson are about to jump ahead of Moore. I think all three of them are borderline 1st round, but likely early-mid second round pics. If we could, trading down to late first/early second and picking one of Delmas or Johnson would make a lot of sense. So, those are the options, unless you must have a write in candidate. I know some will be gone, while others on draft day will be viewed as reaches, but that's what you get when you talk draft prior to the freaking SB For me, I would take Oher. While his stock is down right now, I still view him as a stud OT. While we drafted Williams last year, we could easily play Oher at RT, and have our bookend OTs for the next decade. I think Forte and Orton would both write thank you notes. Of that list, Oher or Raji are the clear top two choices, with Everette Brown being a possibility, IMO. If Oher is gone, my next choice is Duke. Basically, see the above. Pair Duke w/ Williams, and you potentially create a dominating left side for years to come. Again, Forte and Orton write thank you notes. I'm not so sure on Duke anymore. I'll try and holdoff final judgement until after the combine/pro day, but he's a second round prospect in my mind right now. I'd love Mark Sanchez, but he'll be a top 10 pick most likely. I think Josh Freeman is a legit possibility, but I would prefer not to go with him because his bust factor is off the charts. With the way the draft looks now, my preference would be to trade down to the late 1st/early second and go with one of Kruger, Delmas, Johsnon, or Robinson. However, like I said in a different thread, it's easier said then done to trade down. Some other guys that I wouldn't mind/could see at 18 are: CB D.J. Moore, Vanderbilt - He's a really good CB prospect and is very good in man coverage. This is something we need in a cornerback if we decide to continue with the Blitz Heavy Lovie 2 scheme we ran this past year (yes, I call it the Lovie 2) SAM Clint Sintim, Virginia/Clay Matthews, USC/Brian Cushing, USC - I know this sounds crazy drafting what could be a 2 down player with our 1st round pick, and a 3rd linebacker to go along with our other expensive 2, but right now, all three of these guys are raising up draft boards, and SAM is a big enough need to where we might be willing to go with it if the draft falls where one of these guys are the BPA for what our needs are. This also makes sense since all three of these guys can blitz and we have become a team that likes to blitz at least one backer or DB as well as the front 4 (partially because the front 4 can't get pressure anymore). However, Matthews or Cushing would make more sense over Sintim because they could potentially play MIKE as well.
  3. lol, trading down is a lot easier said then done.
  4. Honestly, there's a better chance of Jerry Angelo and Lovie Smith admitting all of their blunders in the past then there are of us drafting Tyson Jackson.
  5. I agree NFO, except I don't see us making any big splashes in free agency. Gross will be grossly overpaid and I just don't see us going after him.
  6. Kiper always makes dumbass "surprise" picks in his early mocks. In fact, most of the well known "draft experts" do so in order to gain more pub. Tyson Jackson makes about zero sense for us and we probably wouldn't even draft him in the 2nd or 3rd if we had the chance.
  7. If we had a replacement for Tillman, moving him to FS might make sense. However, moving him the FS, and replacing our best corner with a rookie would be idiotic.
  8. BearSox

    JA on Nate

    Oh yeah, Gross will get LT money, but depending on what type of scheme, he's a better RT. If it's a zone blocking, run first team like the Panthers, he will have success at LT.
  9. Also, when did San Fran get a second team? Is he talking about the Raiders?
  10. I don't see the NFL adding any expansion teams anytime soon, as right now the set up is pretty perfect, IMO. 32 teams, 2 conferences, 4 divisions per each conference, 4 teams per division, and the schedules are worked out pretty perfectly, IMO. The only way that adding expansion teams would make sense is if it were 8 more teams (1 per division) being added, getting rid of all of the preseason (except for maybe 1 game) and making the regular season 4 games longer (2 for the additional divisional games, and 2 for the additional teams in the other divisions we play). But even then, an expansion like that would be impossible because there's only so much talent in the league. The only way that could be even be remotely possible is if one of these new other leagues like the UFL gets much bigger then expected, and they bring in real good talent. Now, if some struggling team that's not drawing a lot of fans wants to move to Chicago, I'm all for it. It's a big city, and I'd like the competitiveness of having two teams in one city. The Cubs-Sox rivalry is great. However, no way a struggling team looking for a lot of fans would choose Chicago over LA.
  11. I don't mean he'd run 4-3 for a game and then switch. I mean that he'd have a 4-3 defenses with many 3-4 fronts being worked in it. A switch from the 4-3 to 3-4 is quite the overhaul and doing so completely would be bad for any team.
  12. lol, that was easily the best part.
  13. Green Bay announced Dom Capers as their new DC. So, it looks like they will be switching to a 3-4 D. Most likely not right away, but they will probably work in the 3-4 as Dom Capers is a 3-4 guy. They will be only the 4th NFC team to run some form of the 3-4. This scares me because I still don't trust Turner, and not sure if he can make adjustments in his schemes to face the 3-4. However, he'll have to as we are going to be facing 7 teams that will be running some form of the 3-4 next year, after not having to facing a single 3-4 team, let alone 3-4 front last year, and only 2 in 2007. However, luckily for us, Green Bay doesn't have the personal for a 3-4 just yet, and they are going to have to overhaul that defense, mainly the front 7. But when they do get their D organized, they could really stuff a lot of offenses in the NFC because the NFC doesn't really have a true 3-4 team in it, and offenses are just not used to it. The Cards seemed to have gone exclusively to a 3-4 this postseason after gradually switching from a 4-3, and look what they have done to the Falcons, Panthers, and Eagles. The Cowboys also run a 3-4, but their defense sucks so bad right now, it doesn't matter what they run. As for the 49'ers, they are slowly switching to the 3-4 as well.
  14. After watching the replay, Clarke led with his shoulder pads going for McGahee's chest area, and McGahee lowered his shoulders to try and give a hit to Clarke. When McGahee did that, their helmets collided. Nothing illegal about it, that was the last thing Clarke wanted to do. Here's the youtube video of it (probably will be taken down soon):
  15. BearSox

    JA on Nate

    Did he pretty much say Manning was going to be the FS!?!?!? WHY! Is it too dificult to see that he sucks at safety? Yeah, this player sucks at safety, but is actually a very good nickel corner. Lets put him at FS anyway!!!!!!! Also, would rotating Mike Brown and Kevin Payne at SS make too much sense?
  16. I'm almost positive it was mainly shoulder pad to helmet. Perhaps there was some helmet, but it was primarily shoulder pad. And it wasn't an illegal play. It's called playing hard. It was the last thing in Clarke's mind to do that. He wanted to make a big, legal hit, and that's what he did. I'll double check it on my tivo, but it looked completely clean to me.
  17. I'm not really disagreeing, but I would have liked to see him vs. more D-IA competition.
  18. It looked to me that it was shoulder pad to helmet.
  19. Give me Suggs. He's a perfect fit for us, and while we'd have to give him a big contract, Peppers is looking for a LOT more. Besides, watching Suggs gut it out tonight with a severely damaged ligament(s?) in his shoulder shows how well he would fit in with us. While Peppers is a freak athlete and is a stud, he's more about the money then the game, IMO. I'd rather have someone who's more of a leader like Suggs.
  20. I like Barden, but he is playing D-IAA competition. He did dominate Wisconsin, but lots of teams did.
  21. So? Johnson would be cheap and I wouldn't spend anything higher then a 5th rounder on Pegues.
  22. Outside of the 1st, maybe 2nd round, WR is pretty much a crapshoot. Sure you get lucky at times, but that's not the case most of the time. I'd prefer either trading for Holt (he might want to stay though with Spags as his HC now), or signing a solid vet like Mark Clayton (the one on the Bucs) or Bryant Johnson (I'm still very high on him). That is if we don't go WR in the 1st two rounds. I love Britt, but it'd be too early to take him with our first, and he'd likely be gone before or second.
  23. I would prefer either Rashad Johnson or Louis Delmas, but with the lack of top safeties, I see them going before our 2nd round pick. Pegues has too many off the field problems for my liking, but could be an option in the 5th round area. If we can't get either Johnson or Delmas, I like Bruton in the 4th. Very good special teams player, and just an overall solid player. Similar to Steltz, but better, IMO.
  24. did you get this stuff from nfldraftscout?
×
×
  • Create New...