adam

Based on their draft slots, the Bears can easily get 4-5 of those guys. I would not be surprised if at least 4 guys listed are Bears in a few weeks.

Yeah, he is a camp body for sure, especially after adding Oz and Duvernay.

Membou is only 6'3", will more than likely slide inside.

Do the Bears go with 3x QBs on the 53-man?

MJD was a very solid NFL RB, I have no clue why he is in NFL media on the official website posting a mock like this: https://www.nfl.com/news/maurice-jones-drew-2025-nfl-mock-draft-1-0-jets-land-travis-hunter-bears-broncos-raiders-pick-rbs I couldn't even get out of the top 10. He has Hunter going 7th AFTER McMillan, then with Graham and Warren on the board (among others), he has the Bears taking Henderson at 10 as RB2. Seriously, this has to be for clicks, otherwise, this is embarrassing.

Yeah, if he can't find a trade partner, I think he just hits the trenches, OL, DL, or Edge.

What would your draft board look like for the potential players available at #10? Assuming Hunter, Carter and Graham are the only positional players that for sure won't make it to 10, out of these guys, how would you rank them on your board for the Bears? McMillan, WR Jeanty, RB Campbell, OL Warren, TE Barron, CB Starks, S Membou, OL Green, Edge Johnson, CB Burden, WR Pearce Jr, Edge Grant, DL Simmons, OL Banks, OL

The more this goes on, the only 3 players that may be available at 10 that I think Poles would select are Campbell, Jeanty, and Warren. I think he looks to trade down if all 3 of those guys are gone. This is assuming Carter, Hunter, and Graham are gone too.

Just found out there is a 125MB file attachment limit for each user.

Part 2 2025 RELEASE PFF DRAFT GUIDE (p2).pdf

Here is the PFF Draft Guide, so big, I had to split it in two for those that don't have access to it. 2025 RELEASE PFF DRAFT GUIDE (p1).pdf

I feel like Jeanty is one of the guys that Poles wouldn't trade away if he is sitting there at 10. For me it feels like Graham, Jeanty, Warren and Campbell are the 4 guys that Poles would pick if they were there at 10. My assumption is only one will be available.

I have seen people talking about CLE potentially wanting to move back into the 1st to take Sanders, especially if they take Hunter at #2 and Sanders is still there at #10, after NO at #9. The potential trade would be #10 for #33, #67, and a 2026 1st. Why would CLE do it? They need a QB on a rookie deal, can't pass up on a generational talent like Hunter, and they just signed Garrett to a huge deal. They are essentially getting their 2026 1st rounder a year early, and the premium for that is #33 and #67. Why would CHI do it? They would only od it if a blue-chipper doesn't fall to them at #10. The hope is they won't be in the top 10 anymore anytime soon. They would then have #33, #39, #41, #67, and #72 in the 2025 draft AND 2x 1st rounders in 2026. I would assume they could also trade back into the first if they wanted to OR even trade back from #33 because those first few picks always seems to be traded on Day 2.

After running a bunch of mocks, if Sanders goes in the top 9, these are more than likely the available players at #10. I listed the next 23 players to get to pick 32. Some of these guys will slide into the 2nd, but for me, if one of the top 9 don't drop, I would rather take anything to move back because I don't see much difference from Green to Scourton or Membou to Zabel, etc. Thoughts? Barron - CB Starks - S Campbell - LB Membou - OL Green - ED Johnson - CB Burden - WR Pearce - ED Ezeiruaku - ED Grant - DL Simmons - OL Egbuka - WR Banks - OL Golden - WR Nolen - DL Hampton - RB Loveland - TE Williams - ED Steward - ED Walker - ED Zabel - OL Scourton - ED Harmon - DL

Good depth piece and another STer. The ST unit is going to be a top 10 unit this year.