adam

Oh yeah, for sure. I assume they put DEs with DL and OLBs with the LB.

They really need to break it down by Edge, IDL, and LB. So OLine, DLine, and Secondary, then WR, LB, TE, then RB.

They don't even show him in Denver colors because he wasn't there long enough.

From the article at OTC, it is basically for all the performance bonuses that hit during 2022. Those carry over into 2023 since they are not awarded until they are met. So if a guy gets a $1M bonus for Pro Bowl selection, that doesn't count in the 2022 cap because it won't be awarded until well into the season. If that hits, the $1M has to be accounted for in the cap number for the next year. Signing bonuses are spread over all the years, workout bonuses apply to current year, and performance bonuses apply to the following year.

My guess is 5-6 top end FAs this offseason. 2-3 on D-Line (Payne, Ngakoue, Jones/Allen), at least one on O-Line (McGary-RT), then maybe a CB (Dean) or LB (Long), TE (Engram) or WR (Meyers). Then at least one trade back to pick up an extra 1st in 2024 and a 2nd rounder in 2023. 4 picks in the first 64 picks. That would be close to 10 new impact players in one offseason. It is hard to fathom.

The Bears could sign Payne, Ngakoue, and someone like Dre'Mont Jones or Zach Allen at DT and still have the most cap space. That would be an elite D-Line. Then you rotate Gipson and Robinson in at Edge with Justin Jones rotating in at DT.

The league announced the cap will be $224.8M for 2023. With that info and the known carryovers and other related charges, OTC has the Bears at $90.8M in cap space and $82M in effective cap. Using effective cap, which is more realistic, the Bears could sign 3x players with a $10M cap hit for 2023 and STILL have the highest available cap space. Truly insane. 17 teams are over the cap (effective cap) and another 6 are under $10M. The Saints and Bucs are going to have to cut some big name players as they are $58M and $62M over. There is no way you can manipulate the cap that much. Some teams are actually quite comical. Packers are $20M over and saddled with Rodgers contract. Panthers have no QB and are $14M over.

Sucks for him, it was actually a pretty cool story. If Tommy John, that is going to be a long recovery. I am surprised this doesn't happen more than it does already.

Greenlaw was using his arm as a punching bag well after the whistle. That was a little excessive. Look at Shanahan's body of work going back to CLE and ATL. When his team's are in big spots, he chokes. It just feels like he has the "smartest guy in the room" syndrome (like Ryan Pace had). It just feels like any coach with that roster could do what he has done. It is not like he is squeezing every ounce out of his roster. I actually think they underperformed. He did get a lot out of Purdy, but if you watch Purdy's tape in college, it is a headscratcher why he was drafted so late, should've been a 3rd or 4th rounder.

Dude, I was reading some draft stuff and they had an article about Reich's hiring and this was the pic.

I was referring to all the playoff QBs. On Jackson vs Fields, I think that is closer since Jackson is getting older.

So it is KC vs PHI for the Super Bowl. I would've rather seen CIN vs PHI, but this is still a great game. KC feels much weaker than previous years, especially without Hill. Outside of Kelce, they don't have any other dominant skill players. KC's leading rusher was Pacheco with 830 yds. Their leading WR was JuJu with 933 yds. Average at best. Kelce was really the only dominant weapon with 12 TDs and 1338 yds. If I am Philly, I am taking him out of the game. 26% of Mahomes completions are to Kelce and 30% of his TDs. That is a huge chunk of the offense. Philly will be coming into this game with 2 fairly easy games. I feel like they have the better team, so the game will come down to which Mahomes shows up. I am going 30-24 Philly. SF vs PHI SF and Shanahan choke again, this is a trend. He has too much of a track record of shitting his pants in big moments. How do you not challenge the 4th down play to Smith? It was too close of a call and too big of a play (biggest play of the game and on 4th down) not to challenge. Right after the play I was expecting the flag to get thrown out there instantly, or at least before Philly got off another play and Shanahan. A lot of people will come to his defense saying Purdy got hurt, but they left a TE on Reddick who had 16 sacks this season. Purdy doesn't get hit like that with an OT blocking him. CIN vs KC I didn't like the end to the KC game, the refs were calling penalties on the Bengals and not calling the same things on KC. A huge hold on the Mahomes run would've at least negated the 15yd penalty and that play would've been replayed. The punt return that got them there, they missed a blatant block in the back. The 15-yard penalty was a terrible play, but Fields got hit like that at least 3 times this season without that call. That still needs to change. One thing I noticed in all the games, Fields is faster than all these QBs. If he can improve as a passer, he is going to be dangerous.

Flus? What is with the hat placement?

These hacks are all over. There is some guy from Denver media that pops up in the Justin Fields feed all the time. I don't think he reports on any other QB more than Fields: Stating that the Bears are "exploring all options with Fields". That is like saying JAX is exploring all options with Lawrence, come on man. This is completely made up. Here he replies to Bears Twitter saying that Seattle didn't want Fields, that is why they vetoed the trade for Russell Wilson, BEFORE Fields was on the team. It is comical how this guy literally makes something up, then tries to justify himself with more BS. It feels like a parody account. This was after the Bears drafted him and teams like Denver passed on him for CBs, just like CAR did too. Then he makes it seem like Fields "epilepsy" had something to do with it. Come on man.

"Hey Warren, who is your source?", "maybe you heard of him before, Saint Omni".

The Bears can outbid Washington for Payne. Yeah, they can tag him, but if you consider the rookie pool, they would technically have around 30M with Payne, Turner (RG), Heinicke, and Larsen (C) all hitting free agency. Like you said, Heinicke is getting at least $10M, if not more like $15M-$20M, if he is going to be the starter. That would leave $10-15M left for every other position to be filled. The only way they can keep Payne is if they extend him with a cap friendly first year.

It looks like immaturity mixed with some mental health issues.

Oh yeah, I totally understand that, but for contract negotiations, I am sure Payne is going to point to 2022. Same thing goes for a guy that struggled in 2022, even if he was at an MVP level in 2021, if he was crappy in 2022, he ain't getting paid MVP level money. For sure they are different circumstances, I was just comparing their Year 4s. Too many other variables to consider. I try to keep it as easy as possible.

Down to #2 probably won't but #3-5 would.

No I am using the same year (Year 4) for each player before they join their new team (assuming Payne leaves).

My scenario goes like this: 1. Trade down once but only down enough where you can still get someone like Anderson, Carter, or Johnson. That way you get the extra draft capital plus a blue chipper this year (you need one every year). 2. If you can trade down again, stay in the top 8 and can still get one of those guys, you do it. However, the goal is to not be drafting in the top 10 next year with your own pick, so you have to get the most impactful player you can while you are drafting so low. The ultimate scenario is 1 to 2, then 2 to 4. However, there seems like there are going to be several other teams (7-LVR, 8-ATL, 9-CAR) looking for a QB in the top 10. So the Bears could go 1 to 4 (IND), then 4 to 7 (LVR) if only 2 QBs are gone at 4, which is possible. If 3 QBs go in the top 3, the Bears have to keep 4 and pick Anderson. It seems like the top 5 is Young, Stroud, Levis, Anderson, and Carter (in any order). So if the Bears trade out of the top 5, into that 7-9 range, they would still get one of: Myles Murphy, ED, Clemson Tyree Wilson, ED, Texas Tech Bryan Bresee, DL, Clemson Paris Johnson, OT, Ohio St Quentin Johnson, WR, TCU So is Carter or Anderson better than Bresee or Murphy + an extra 2nd rounder? I don't know. It will come down to who the Bears believe is the best fit for their defense.

Whitehair is a nice veteran presence as this point and an upgrade would be minimal if you could only use the cap savings. I can see them doing that after 2023 though, when the cap savings is considerably higher and you can get an upgrade for the savings.

These are their stats from the season before going to a new team: 2019 - Buckner, 7.5 sacks, 9 TFL, 62 tackles, 14 QB Hits, 2 PD, 2 FF, 1 TD 2022 - Payne, 11.5 sacks, 18 TFL, 64 tackles, 20 QB Hits, 5 PD, 1 Sfty Payne was a monster this year, 4 more sacks, double the TFL and more QB hits.

I was actually thinking about the SFvPHI game the other way around since PHI is at home. The SF offense only scored 19 pts, at home, and 6 pts came from Dak INTs, which was literally the difference in the game. PHI and DAL defenses are very similar. Purdy had 214 yds passing and the leading rusher was Mitchell with 51 yds. Now they are going to Philly from SF. They are also playing in the early time slot and PHI got an extra day rest. So SF has to travel from SF to PHI while PHI stays at home. That is basically another day. So Philly has two days extra on SF going into this game, and SF has to travel to the east coast. They played 3 games in the Central or Eastern Time Zone this season, and went 1-2 in those games. Either way, both games will feel like Super Bowls because any 4 of them can win the Super Bowl. I would be shocked if Purdy wins this one. He would be the steal of the draft if he does and maybe of all-time, Mr. Irrelevant takes a team to a Super Bowl, and maybe wins it? No way, it ends here. As much as I marvel at Mahomes amazing and crazy throws, he seems to drop off more than others when not 100%. There is no way he is healed from a high ankle sprain. If he is healthy, KC wins, but with him hobbled, I will take CIN.

Who do you got this weekend? SF @ PHI? I am going PHI 27-24 in a close one. CIN @ KC? I am going CIN in an upset 24-23. It is going to be in the low 20s with a wind chill in the teens for the game. CIN has a better running game which I think will be the difference.