adam

Not that someone from above, but maybe!

MadLith, I think your letter worked lol.

Clearly, someone above directed him to make this move.

That's the thing, when he was calling plays, he was also making himself a worse head coach. Now Nagy can be a better game day HC and the team has a better play-caller. If you add that to Fields over Dalton, those are all significant improvements that are exponential. I always thought Nagy was a good HC. If he sticks to this plan, he can be an even better HC. This will be Fields' 3rd week as the starter and getting starter reps, but only the 2nd week with Lazor calling plays. So there is still a lot of room to improve. Here are the teams and their defensive ratings before the bye: LV (15th), GB (23rd), TB (19th), SF (16th), PIT (22nd). Fields will only face one current top 10 defense the rest of the year. The best Defense remaining based on DVOA is Arizona at #6 after a mini-post Thanksgiving bye. Here is what the schedule looks like post bye: BAL (12), DET (31), ARZ (6), GB (23), MIN (14), SEA (25), NYG (27), MIN (14). The good thing is the Bears have extra rest and prep time for the top two defensive teams they will face the rest of the year.

Then there is this: You can't tell me this kid isn't different. He knows that this is nothing to celebrate over. He doesn't want participation ribbons.

Not to be confused with just this week. Dalton is a full go, but Fields has been named the starter going forward. A huge move for Nagy to commit to something.

I hope not. Against the Lions, Monty was 23-106 for 4.6 per carry, and Williams/Herbert combined for 11-62 for 5.6 per carry. If they can get to 20 carries combined, then add a few planned runs for Fields, I think they will be ok. Passing attempts last 3 games: 17, 20, 24. So the sweet spot is around 25 passes and 25 rushes it seems.

There is no way you single him. Put a LB underneath and a Safety over the top. Blanket him the entire game. Looking at Carr's progressions, Waller is almost always his first or second read. You take that away and he has to go to one of the other WRs, who outside of Renfrow, seem to become a little skittish after taking that first hard hit.

I am sure some other teams have had the same thing happen to them, but the Bears had sacks taken off the board due to penalties too. Also, Attaochu doesn't have a sack yet, and Edwards in only 2 games has 1.5. It will be nice when Hicks and Goldman get to line up next to each other for an entire game. We have yet to see that since 2019.

He is a 2nd Team All-Pro Punt Returner from 2020, and has 5 career return TDs (3 punt, 2 kick). This is like getting CPat back for a fraction of the cost.

Knee sprain, so hopefully it is on the lower end of the spectrum for recovery.

There are two players on the entire team you have to account for, Waller and Crosby. If the Bears concentrate on them, they win.

This is going to hurt, but I am glad it is not season-ending. In other team news, it looks like they traded a 6th Round Pick for WR Jakeem Grant from Miami. He is a Return Specialist and will likely take over both the KR and PR duties with Herbert moving to RB2. Webster probably getting cut for his reluctance to even fair catch a ball last week like Ted Ginn did last year. Grant also has some speed, but until they used Goodwin and Byrd, he won't be much of an option on offense, which is fine with me.

This is going to hurt, but I am glad it is not season-ending. In other team news, it looks like they traded a 6th Round Pick for WR Jakeem Grant from Miami. He is a Return Specialist and will likely take over both the KR and PR duties with Herbert moving to RB2. Webster probably getting cut for his reluctance to even fair catch a ball last week like Ted Ginn did last year. Grant also has some speed, but until they used Goodwin and Byrd, he won't be much of an option on offense, which is fine with me.

Bears are currently 6.5 dogs in Las Vegas. The line seems about right unless you watched MNF. The Raiders looked terrible with only 213 yards on offense, most coming on 2x TD drives (159 yds) in the 3rd quarter. For the other 3 quarters, nothing. They looked like the Bears playing the Browns. Their first 7 drives (the entire first half) consisted of the following: 3 and out, punt 3 and out, punt 3 and out, punt 4 and out, turnover on downs 6 plays, punt 3 and out, punt 2 plays, end of half 26 total yards in the first half, down 21-0 On their only first down in the first half, a 21 yard gain to Waller, Waller got a 15-yard penalty for taunting lol. They turned it around in the 3rd quarter with 2x TD drives, but ended the game with a missed FG, Interception, and 4 and out. So out of 12 drives, they only scored on 2, then had 3 turnovers, 5 punts, 1 missed FG, and 1 end of half. The bad news is they are the #1 passing team in the league. Ruggs, Waller, Renfrow, and Edwards all have over 200 yards receiving. The good news is the Chargers play the same style defense as the Bears. On the other side of the ball, they were absolutely gashed by Ekeler on the ground. He had 117 yards on only 15 carries. So even if we have Williams/Herbert, I think we will be ok. Justin Herbert was not sacked or intercepted and had 8 different receivers catch a pass. I really like this matchup for the Bears with the Raiders on a short week. If Fields starts, Bears 27-17 If Dalton starts, Raiders 24-17

Yeah, that's the ultimate goal. Teams cannot defend the run, medium AND deep routes.

Exactly, very inconsistent. That's the thing, they didn't blow the whistle before the fumble.

LOL no wonder everyone voted blue pill.

I don't disagree that the defense overall was a C or C- collectively. The Safeties were an F, the D-Line was a C and the CBs were no better than a C-, probably a D, though Johnson and Shelley were pretty good, so I think we are splitting hairs. If you give the Lions two FGs or even a FG and a TD, they still lose. A turnover is a turnover, it was a freak play but it's like a batted or tipped ball that gets intercepted. One factor that needs to be mentioned again is how terrible the officiating was. Even the commentators were confused on a few calls. Literally, both scoring drives were impacted by bad calls: - Bears are called offsides on a play where the play clock expired. You can't be offsides on a delay of game. It ends up a free play for Goff who gets a long completion that keeps the drive alive (penalty is declined) and the Lions eventually score a TD. The drive should've ended in a punt. - Crawford makes a textbook tackle on special teams and they call returner interference, 15 extra yards and the Lions start on Bears 44 before scoring TD. Do they score if they start from their 41? There were also these 3 gems: - Tonga playing to the whistle, on a play where the ball was intercepted, gets penalized for unnecessary roughness. They didn't even review the play. - Mack gets penalized for roughing the passer after he tips a pass and his follow-through grazes Goff's helmet. That keeps the drive alive. Quinn later gets strip-sack to stop this drive. - Swift gets smashed lands on the back of a Bear as he fumbles. The play is ruled dead so it can't be reviewed or challenged. On replay it showed the ball coming out before he was down. It should've been a fumble.

There is a chance that Fields gives us the better chance to win and make the playoffs, but if those were the only two options, would you mind enduring a down year for future success?

I watched Coach Matt Nagy not groom a young quarterback. - Scary that we are back in the same place, he is considering going with Dalton over grooming Fields. I watched Coach Nagy tell me the team should run more, when he is the one making the call on how often to run. This is the Bears. We run the ball. - Monty had 10 carries against Cleveland, 10, while they watched Fields get sacked 9 times. I watched coach Nagy give up play-calling and see some success with Coach Bill Lazor. Then, I watched coach Nagy take the play-calling back, which resulted in some less than stellar performances against our most bitter rivals, the Packers and the Saints. - If this happens again, fans need to boycott the next home game, just don't show up, that is the only thing that will get their attention. It is crazy that you wrote that in January and it is still accurate in October AFTER they drafted another QB and Pace handed out some more stupid contracts.

That is understandable, I am probably a little bias from how bad the Cleveland game was. For the O-Line, 1 sack and over 170 yards rushing is a good O-Line day regardless of opponent. Michael Brockers and Nick Williams are pretty decent on the D-Line. The only reason the TEs didn't get an F is because they at least blocked well, and are they at fault for not getting targets (not getting open) or is it the play calls? On the defense, it is hard to lump them all together, and the game is not won by yardage. They stopped the Lions when they needed to and got some takeaways that helped the offense. 4 sacks, 2 takeaways and only 14 pts allowed is a decent day at the office. There is room for improvement on the DLine and in the secondary for sure. Considering that the Ravens essentially lost to the Lions the week before except for a missed call and record FG, were beating GB in the 2nd half before the wheels fell off, and lost to the 49ers by one score; the Lions may be devoid of talent, but they have been competitive in every game.

Remember all the talk about Trey Burton being the "adjuster", then it was Cohen. The adjuster was the key to Nagy's offense, so now what? Who is playing that role? It can't be any of the TEs based on their usage. Graham has 3 targets in 4 games, on pace for 4 receptions and 44 yards lol.

There were two calls that were inexcusable, that one because how can it be interference if he caught the ball cleanly? The other one was on the offsides after the play clock expired. It should've been a delay of game on the offense. Both of those were huge calls that accounted for -25 yards in total.

Me too. Just put a lock on it and throw away the key. There is no need to go back.