adam

I heard that they were looking at him at NB.

I am curious to see the full terms. I like Willie, and if he can continue to produce and be a great locker room guy, this is a great deal.

http://www.si.com/nfl/2016/07/27/chicago-b...nfl-free-agency according to PFF: Chicago also signed wide receiver B.J. Daniels, which brings the roster to the 90-player maximum.

Bring him back for one game and have him take a knee and run off the field to a standing ovation and then retire.

Silatolu might have been signed because of this: https://twitter.com/BradBiggs/status/756923475479109632

He was a DB and KR/PR, so it looks like they are happy with what they have at those positions (which is a good sign).

I loved when he shutdown Moss and Megatron, my favorite play:

Borderline but probably won't get in. Not enough INTs as a CB. I believe he had more forced fumbles than INTs for his career. He definitely redefined the position with the Peanut Punch but not dominant enough for HoF.

Actually 52 players are not red, so counting practice squad and cuts, we will probably have 15-20 new players next year as well. Of all the red names, only 15 or so are actually going to be on the 53-man roster. So to me, it seems we are in a great position, with only younger players or solid veterans signed longer than a year or two. We don't really have any bad contracts left on the books going into 2017. The most dead money we would have if we needed to cut a player next year (outside of rookie deals) would be Cutler and Freeman who both have $2mil in dead money if cut. Every other veteran player could be cut for less, which is awesome. Honestly, if we are not in the playoff hunt near the deadline, I would love to move Houston, Young, and potentially Royal or Gould for draft picks. Now I understand that no one may want them, but if there was a trade market and we were not in the hunt, then the draft picks would be more valuable to us going forward.

One of my all-time favorite Bears. Sad to see another one leave the game. I wonder if the Bears will sign him to a 1-day deal to retire as a Bear?

I would say if they tag him again, then yes. However, if they can work out a long term deal before that point then I don't think it was a mistake not to pay him now. I also think they want to see what White does. If he goes off, then Alshon is worth a lot less to the Bears.

It is not about controversy or conspiracy. The Bears were in the first year of a total regime change. Expectations were low. All I was pointing out based on the article was that Gase ran more than 10% than any other team when we lost, and was one of the 3 least flexible play callers based on game situations. No one will ever know the exact motives behind the decisions, but it is interesting that a guy who was riding Manning's coat tails as an OC in Denver then magically improved Cutler with a 6-10 record becomes an offensive mastermind. If you think about it, we were going to be a losing team last year regardless, and if we pushed on offense and took more chances, the offense might have scored more (debatable), but Cutler definitely would've had more turnovers. By playing conservative (not to win essentially), it appeared to everyone that Cutler magically improved from the year before when in essence he was just restricted and the offense was going to run even when the game dictated passing. So who gained the most from the scenario? It seems to be Gase. It was probably not the primary intent, but the stats at least point to the fact that something more than just "reducing bad plays" was involved. Think of it this way. There are a lot worse QB's than Cutler, worse offenses, etc, yet we ran 10% more than the next closest team (in losses), and ran 40% more than ARZ (which ran the least in losses).

That does basically sum it up. A WR1 but not a Franchise player.

Taylor just likes Porter. No way are they top 5. I could buy top 10-12, but he is missing a ton of other tandems before I would even think of Fuller or Porter.

I don't know if the per year money is even the issue anymore with NFL contracts. From what I have seen, it is guaranteed money and the number of years. So if they are far apart, it is probably tied to how much Alshon wants up front in guarantees, and I am sure the Bears are hesitant to give him a lot of guarantees due to injury history.

If that is true about Callahan, than maybe our secondary is not as bad as it looks on paper. I know he had a couple of decent games but only played in what 7 games? So the jury is still out, but having a solid NB would be a nice. Patrick Robinson at #2? Wow, we were talking about picking him up as a UFA last year.

No, that might have been the whole reason, limit Cutler mistakes. However, if we were already going to lose (or losing), what more did we have to lose by throwing the ball? Did Gase have more to lose than the team? Meaning, if he keeps Cutler in check and reduces turnovers, even if we lose, he can point to other factors on why we lost. This would seem to keep his value as a coach higher than if Cutler threw 25 picks and we went 6-10. Just a thought.

I am good on rushing the ball. The article was about the playcallers propensity to run even when losing/in a loss. We ran more than anyone and lost, which correlates to the playcallers reluctance to pass when losing. So in other words, we were playing from behind not to get blown out.

We ran 10% more than any other team in a loss and had one of the lower yards per carry of any team. So it is sort of counter-intuitive. The numbers don't tell the whole story, but does shine the light on some things that are not easily recognizable otherwise.

I found an interesting article about rushing tendencies by offensive playcallers: http://www.4for4.com/fantasy-football/2016...ates?aid=raybon The first chart shows how much the play calling deviates based on the outcome of the game. Interestingly, Gase was 3rd from last (Trestman 2nd from last) for their careers and both were tied for last in 2015. The Bears also had the highest percentage of rushing attempts in losses than any other team and it was not even close. So basically, even though we were losing (or would eventually lose), Gase would still rush the ball (which would most likely end the drive). How many times did you ask yourself, why are they running on 3rd and 6 last year? To me, I often thought about this but never really second guessed it. Just to look at this from a different perspective. Was Gase actually holding back the offense too much (trying to prevent turnovers) that he actually made the team worse (more losses)? Just a thought.

Good catch, I didn't even think about the connection to AJ. I thought Hoyer was already locked in as the #2, and it is hard for me to see us carrying 3 QB's into the regular season, so this just has to be a camp arm.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/footb...0701-story.html Saw this yesterday. The most interesting part was the fact that New Orleans was intending to claim him and accidentally sent notification to entire league. The Bears swooped in and grabbed him. I don't know if he will make the roster, but the move was interesting nonetheless.

Definitely interesting, but it wouldn't change my assessment of him that much with that info. Either it is on the tape or it's not. Floyd is a freak, if he can bulk up a little without losing the explosiveness, I think he will be fine.

I am hoping they lock AJ and Long up long term soon.

Why did they screw up? Marshall has yet to even play in a playoff game and has a $9.5 cap hit. Bennett has played sparingly in 2 playoff games (in 2009) and hasn't been back since, and is set to make $5.1. Both are on their 4th NFL team. That is almost $15mil in aging veterans at skill positions with some questionable off the field antics.