Jump to content

adam

Admin
  • Posts

    16,429
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by adam

  1. Werner too. Kyle is an athlete, and I wanted him at #50, but with the early run on OL (3 out of the top 4 picks), and 7 in the first 19, they almost had to pull the trigger. We still haven't seen Geno Smith or Barkley go, and I assume that will be in the 2nd, Lacy as well. So we should be setup for a very solid pick at #50.
  2. For me, I would only like to see Watson, Jones, Schwenke, Ertz, Teo, Brown, Minter, Banks, Taylor, or Amerson. Based on where we pick (18th in the 2nd), a couple of these guy should still be there. Watson would come in as an OT, Jones or Schwenke at C, I wouldn't mind Ertz here, Teo, Brown, or Minter in the middle, though I prefer Brown. Then any of the 3 CB's would also be nice. We also have to consider this pick will be someone valued at 50-116, so it could be a guy projected in the 3rd, since we don't have a pick.
  3. Looks like a bunch of these guys will be available at #50. Wide receiver Keenan Allen, Cal Robert Woods, USC Markus Wheaton, Oregon State Justin Hunter, Tennessee Quinton Patton, Louisiana Tech Tight end Zach Ertz, Stanford Gavin Escobar, San Diego State Vance McDonald, Rice Offensive line Menelik Watson, Florida State Larry Warford, Kentucky Terron Armstead, Arkansas-Pine Bluff Barrett Jones, Alabama Brian Schwenke, California Defensive tackle Johnathan Hankins, Ohio State Jesse Williams, Alabama John Jenkins, Georgia Kawann Short, Purdue Linebacker Manti Te'o, Notre Dame Kevin Minter, LSU Arthur Brown, Kansas State Cornerback Johnthan Banks, Mississippi State Jamar Taylor, Boise State David Amerson, N.C. State
  4. Yeah was thinking Minter, wrote Ogletree.
  5. Vikes get Floyd, Rhodes, and Patterson. Wow.
  6. So who can redeem the pick at #50 Ogletree, Brown?
  7. How about: 2013 RT Long RG Carimi C Schwenke LG Slauson LT Bushrod or RT Long RG Warford C Garza LG Slauson LT Bushrod
  8. Also, Emery said they were targeting Long, which seems like they liked him the best out of the players that were available at 20. Technically just because he was selected at 20, doesn't mean that is where his value had to be. It only had to be from 20-49, which is about right where Long would've fell into. So Emery drafted someone who was not going to be there at 50. How about Pugh at 19, or Manuel before Smith and Barkley. Floyd was projected as high as #2 and goes in the 20's.
  9. So Eifert, Trufant, Floyd, and Rhodes all go right after our pick. I really hope he works out and anchors the right side of our line for the next decade. Otherwise, this was an incredibly questionable pick. I like Long, I just didn't think he would ever go in the top 20. I still think it was Pugh coming off the board, they didn't believe he would be there at 50, and an LB would be.
  10. All I can say is I would take Kyle Long any day over Manti Teo. So that alone is a success for me.
  11. That is pure speculation. I am sure Pugh going at 19 made them pull the trigger.
  12. I actually liked him at 50, but at least we addressed the O-Line. I got the player right, but the round wrong.
  13. Teo is on the phone? It's Teo.
  14. Please no Te'o, at least not at 20.
  15. Floyd was as high as the top 5, getting him would be awesome.
  16. Seems like a logical pick for us at #20, if Angelo was still GM. Injured + Safety
  17. Makes sense, I liked him better than Joeckel. KC is going to be a lot better this year.
  18. WR and both OTs are questionable? Bushrod? Marshall, Jeffery? Safety? We are so deep at safety. Both Guards are trouble? Slauson? DT and CB are good? I am confused, this is not very accurate. I would say OG, LB, DT, CB, OT, C, WR then QB would be the order.
  19. After everyone got over the emotions of the move it was the right decision. The funny thing is Urlacher couldve been back, he just elected not to play for the Bears offer. It was ultimately his decision.
×
×
  • Create New...