Jump to content

adam

Admin
  • Posts

    16,551
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by adam

  1. Yeah was thinking Minter, wrote Ogletree.
  2. Vikes get Floyd, Rhodes, and Patterson. Wow.
  3. So who can redeem the pick at #50 Ogletree, Brown?
  4. How about: 2013 RT Long RG Carimi C Schwenke LG Slauson LT Bushrod or RT Long RG Warford C Garza LG Slauson LT Bushrod
  5. Also, Emery said they were targeting Long, which seems like they liked him the best out of the players that were available at 20. Technically just because he was selected at 20, doesn't mean that is where his value had to be. It only had to be from 20-49, which is about right where Long would've fell into. So Emery drafted someone who was not going to be there at 50. How about Pugh at 19, or Manuel before Smith and Barkley. Floyd was projected as high as #2 and goes in the 20's.
  6. So Eifert, Trufant, Floyd, and Rhodes all go right after our pick. I really hope he works out and anchors the right side of our line for the next decade. Otherwise, this was an incredibly questionable pick. I like Long, I just didn't think he would ever go in the top 20. I still think it was Pugh coming off the board, they didn't believe he would be there at 50, and an LB would be.
  7. All I can say is I would take Kyle Long any day over Manti Teo. So that alone is a success for me.
  8. That is pure speculation. I am sure Pugh going at 19 made them pull the trigger.
  9. I actually liked him at 50, but at least we addressed the O-Line. I got the player right, but the round wrong.
  10. Teo is on the phone? It's Teo.
  11. Please no Te'o, at least not at 20.
  12. Floyd was as high as the top 5, getting him would be awesome.
  13. Seems like a logical pick for us at #20, if Angelo was still GM. Injured + Safety
  14. Makes sense, I liked him better than Joeckel. KC is going to be a lot better this year.
  15. WR and both OTs are questionable? Bushrod? Marshall, Jeffery? Safety? We are so deep at safety. Both Guards are trouble? Slauson? DT and CB are good? I am confused, this is not very accurate. I would say OG, LB, DT, CB, OT, C, WR then QB would be the order.
  16. After everyone got over the emotions of the move it was the right decision. The funny thing is Urlacher couldve been back, he just elected not to play for the Bears offer. It was ultimately his decision.
  17. A pretty logical draft by position, though a WR instead of TE would be the better route IMO. Richardson in the 1st would make our D-Line one of the most dominant in the league with Peppers and Melton next to him, and he could learn from the best. Brown at 50 is a great value, and he could come in and possibly start at MLB. Webb is a good pickup in the 4th, immediately becomes Nickelback and could move over if Jennings or Tillman get hurt. Fragel would be decent there for a project. He might not start year one, but has enough upside to compete. Gragg is eh, but it is a 6th.
  18. Yeah that would be awesome.
  19. So we are trading with SF for 34 and JAX for 64? Do you mean SF's 61st pick? Brown and Pugh are fine, but Jones may be a little high at 64.
×
×
  • Create New...