adam

Not that I want him, but didn't they say almost the same thing about Brady coming out of Michigan?

Damn, I was hoping Flacco would not move up so high. Doubt we get him now. I guess the 2nd round is still a possibility.

Good guess.

NFO, That is a harsh assessment on some of those years. If you draft a Pro Bowler, that in itself is a pretty good draft. You seem to want every single pick to work out, and that is completely unrealistic. The 2006 draft is a C+? That is crazy, Hester alone makes it an "A". He is the top return specialist of All-time. 2004 is a B, with Harris, Berrian, AND Vasher? That is a solid "A", probably an A+. I agree with the other years. The biggest thing to notice is how bad our 1st rounders have turned out other than Harris (Olsen is too new to eval). That is why I would rather trade down if possible.

Remember Urlacher's recovery speed. He caught up to Bush from 20 yards behind.

I don't know if you can call one single incident a character issue. The guy made an utterly stupid and dangerous mistake, but he seems like he has turned it around since then.

Favre has as much to do with the wins as he does with the losses. He is such a high risk, high reward player.

There is no way the Pack repeats what they did this year (13-3). They were good, but not that good. They seemed to play teams just at the right time, and were not hit with any major injuries. Minnesota is more of a threat with AP.

The good thing for the Bears is teams higher might have more of a propensity to take something other than OL compared to a sexy pick like QB, RB, WR, etc. Just think of the offensive line the Lions could've built instead of drafting WR after WR every year.

Sproles is barely used, so if Turner wants to be more creative, give Wolfe less playing time?

I'm not talking about storyline more than history. Going undefeated the entire season with a 16 game regular season is unprecedented. If the G-Men win, it might be one of the biggest upsets in SB history.

The Bears could be meeting the Pats for a 1986 rematch right now. Full health, the Bears are better than the G-Men.

Unless we somehow get 2 1st Rounders, thats not going to happen. Phillips is a top 15 pick, and Mendenhall is a 1st rounder.

Favre had a lot to do with that loss.

Ha, I was thinking 41-24.

The O-Line depth also allows you to trade down in the 1st and still pick up a quality pick. Someone is always there looking to move up to get their guy. I would be ecstatic with a trade down into the 20's while picking up a late 2nd rounder. We would then have 5 picks in the first 3 rounds.

G-Men vs Pats in Arizona. Prediction: Pats by 17.

What irony, G-Men win after a Favre INT with a Tynes FG (after missing the last two).

This SuperBowl is going to be really interesting with all the history involved.

Ha, Favre looks like Favre with another INT.

Good info. I would say it would be either SEA vs NE or NO vs SD. All the other games would be pretty boring.

Tynes should be cut. Two misses under 40 is unacceptable.

Yeah, it looks like a sunburn, only purple.

That was a pretty boring game. The Chargers kicked way too many FGs inside the 10. Should've at least went for one of those.

Yeah, but the fact that he is running and will be cleared to practice is great news. Sometimes guys are not ready for this until the summer.