adam Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Now at first most say this is only Fantasy Football, but on the other hand, there is some correlation between stats and points. The Bears offense positions finished no worse than #12 at TE, and Defense comes in at a respectable #14. By position: Cutler - 11th Forte - 5th Marshall - 5th Jeffery - 7th Bennett - 12th Gould - 10th Bears Def - 14th Forte, Marshall, and Jeffery all made the Top 20 overall as well. If Forte, Marshall, and Jeffery finish in the top 10 of their positions, Cutler is easily a top 10 QB. http://sports.yahoo.com/news/2014-fantasy-...-204748821.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrackerDog Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Forte, Marshall, and Jeffery all made the Top 20 overall as well. If Forte, Marshall, and Jeffery finish in the top 10 of their positions, Cutler is easily a top 10 QB. Wonder what the scoring system is. Can't tell after a quick look on the site. If it's PPR (which I hate) it wouldn't be as meaningful as if it's just yardage. But in either case, really, if we have two WR's in the top 20 overall, Cutler is a top 5 QB at season's end. You're right, regardless, fantasy points translate to offensive production and points on the field. That's exactly what they're trying to do. The remaining question, however, is whether the D can be halfway decent enough to have those offensive points translate into W's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.