Alaskan Grizzly Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 http://m.espn.go.com/general/story?storyId...le.com%2F%22%7D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownman Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 Really??!!! There is a team out there that wants this so called player??!!! Let the trade happen on February 2nd!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABEARSDABOMB Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 This would be amazing. I wonder if the titans are one of those teams? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 At this point, I would give up a pick to move him if another team would eat his salary. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 I'm not surprised by this at all actually. With the cap going up next year there's gonna be a lot of money floating around. Jay has all the talent in the world and some team might wanna try and get that outta him. Perhaps a tam with a good OL can make Jay look good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 Hell Yes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan Grizzly Posted November 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 Really??!!! There is a team out there that wants this so called player??!!! Let the trade happen on February 2nd!!!!! Anyone say 'Raiders'? Or even Rams? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 He's not worth a 5th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan Grizzly Posted November 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 Or TB? http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/footb...1112-story.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 Lovie: McCown and a 2nd RD... haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Buck Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 Now that's funny Lovie: McCown and a 2nd RD... haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParkerBear7 Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 Sure cutler has his faults and I am very disappointed in his play at times but until chicago can draft and develop their own home grown perennial all pro QB I think is stupid to keep bashing cutler. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 Sure cutler has his faults and I am very disappointed in his play at times but until chicago can draft and develop their own home grown perennial all pro QB I think is stupid to keep bashing cutler. They never seem to be in position to draft a QB, they haven't been able to draft or groom any key positional positions like DE, OLT, or QB. Those are positions that make franchises and we have had to spend or trade premium prices for. Having a awful year might be a blessing, but im sure we would waste it on a player we would try to convert from a S to a DE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParkerBear7 Posted November 16, 2014 Report Share Posted November 16, 2014 They never seem to be in position to draft a QB, they haven't been able to draft or groom any key positional positions like DE, OLT, or QB. Those are positions that make franchises and we have had to spend or trade premium prices for. Having a awful year might be a blessing, but im sure we would waste it on a player we would try to convert from a S to a DE. [/quote I don't beleive the Bears are never in a good position to draft a QB as they could have drafted Aaron Rodgers when Green Bay took him at number 22 a few years ago. Thus, the true problem all along has been the folks running the organization and not having the right gm and coaching staff in place to put this organization in its proper place. Since they beat the Vikings I'm now hoping they run the table because I sure hate losing but if they lose one more game they should start all the youngsters and backups to develop them for next season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted November 17, 2014 Report Share Posted November 17, 2014 Trading Cutler doesn't bother me except for the fact who is going to replace him? It's not going to be a FA QB that comes in and saves the day because those guys just aren't available in FA. In theory we can trade Cutler away and then move up in the draft to grab someone. Who are folks asking for? The other possible option would be trading for some teams young backup QB. This is how GB got Favre, SF found Steve Young, Seattle found Hasselback. Then again those deals can turn into a Charlie Whitehurst deal like Seattle did years ago. I can understand the notion this guy isn't as good as what we need but the idea is to make a deal so the team gets better, not just making a deal so we can say good riddance. Don't make some deal and then have me stuck watching the next Henry Burris at QB. I'll take Jay and his 1-2 INTs per game over that any day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted November 17, 2014 Report Share Posted November 17, 2014 Trading Cutler doesn't bother me except for the fact who is going to replace him? It's not going to be a FA QB that comes in and saves the day because those guys just aren't available in FA. In theory we can trade Cutler away and then move up in the draft to grab someone. Who are folks asking for? The other possible option would be trading for some teams young backup QB. This is how GB got Favre, SF found Steve Young, Seattle found Hasselback. Then again those deals can turn into a Charlie Whitehurst deal like Seattle did years ago. I can understand the notion this guy isn't as good as what we need but the idea is to make a deal so the team gets better, not just making a deal so we can say good riddance. Don't make some deal and then have me stuck watching the next Henry Burris at QB. I'll take Jay and his 1-2 INTs per game over that any day. I don't think the options can be "do nothing" and "make sure the other option is better". The options are "do nothing" and "give yourself a chance to be better". There is no way to predict the future, but if we don't try, then you can expect more of the same over the last couple of years. Sure Cutler is better than the platoon of QBs we have run out over the years, but the question is he good enough to win some tight games and give us a chance to win in the regular season and playoffs. We are paying him a lot and he has under-performed for the money. We could get similar output for a fraction of the cost and use the money to address other glaring needs. Who knows, his contract may have prevented us from landing TJ Ward or J. Byrd. I sort of like how Seattle did it, they drafted a QB AND picked up one in free agency. Eventually one will stick. I think we are still a year away from trading Cutler, because his stats are at least decent even though a lot has come in garbage time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABEARSDABOMB Posted November 17, 2014 Report Share Posted November 17, 2014 I think Tennessee would be interested, presume the Rams might be as well. Maybe even Houston. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chitownhustla Posted November 17, 2014 Report Share Posted November 17, 2014 http://m.espn.go.com/general/story?storyId...le.com%2F%22%7D The rest of the NFL has seen what he have seen so far. I doubt anyone would trade for Cutler. If they would it goes to show how hard it is to find a top 10 type of QB. His stats are top ten for the most part, its just the 1 or two bad throws that we are still seeing. Even this weeks game, the end of the half INT, it was dog shit. I cant remember the 2nd one but the 1st one BM was double covered, a guy underneath and over the top. He should not have thrown that one. If you are going to make that throw it should have been more towards the sideline and higher where only BM could have caught it. It just goes to show you what winning does, with those 3 TD's and 2 int's the headlines on espn read Cutlers 3 TD's lead the Bears to victory. Had the Vikings turned those INT's into Points they prolly would have won. If the Bears lost the headlines would have read, Cutler throws 2 ints and the Bears lose. INT's are going to happen, Cutler just throws too many!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted November 17, 2014 Report Share Posted November 17, 2014 TEN, STL, HOU, and the NYJ's are teams I think could show interest in Cutler. Maybe more. If the Jets don't get Winston or Mariota, they might be desperate to find a stop gap for a couple of years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daventry Posted November 17, 2014 Report Share Posted November 17, 2014 That is the best news I have seen all year! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.