killakrzydav Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 And the wheels fall off... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 Not what I was expecting... And the wheels fall off... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 There goes my Pace man-love. Stupid pick. Forte, Carey, Langford, Quiz. So that means either Carey is wasted before potential is known, or the Quiz signing was completely pointless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 If he is going BPA, Langford was selected 20 slots after his big board ranking (CBS Sports). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 There goes my Pace man-love. Stupid pick. Forte, Carey, Langford, Quiz. So that means either Carey is wasted before potential is known, or the Quiz signing was completely pointless. or it means Forte's days are really numbered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killakrzydav Posted May 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 I really like what I have recently read about Langford. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 Remember that John Fox likes to rotate his RB's. Would not surprise me if the Bears used all 4 throughout the course of the season or games. They did in Denver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 That's a waste of pick.... made no sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawhizz Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 Not a huge fan of the pick, but it sounds like Fox likes 4 RBs on the roster. I think Langford immediately becomes out best goal line back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixote Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 Must admit, first head scratcher for me in this draft. Are they looking for a future replacement for Forte knowing he has a lot of past reps, age, and future contract issues? Can't really say as I obviously do not know their thinking but it obviously says the coaches and GM are not enamored with our present backups for Forte. Like most here I was expecting us to go in a different direction with our 4th rd pick. Jury is out on this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 That's a waste of pick.... made no sense For once I agree. He is not big. Ran the fastest 40 time at combine for RBs. Hope he is the next Leveon Bell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradjock Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 That's a waste of pick.... made no sense He was considered the best "all around" back in terms of blocking, receiving and running. Also good special teams background. Apparently we really don't like Kadeem Carey. I am STUNNED we've drafted offense with 3 of our first four picks. STUNNED. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 I like it! Good value pick, as Forte will not be on the team next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 Langford seems like he has a similar skill set to Matt Forte. They may see him as his replacement for the 2016-2017 season. He's going to be 24 in December so he's probably only got a good 6 years in him to produce. Don't really like that. But for a 4th rounder, it's not that big of a deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrackerDog Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 IMO this guy isn't Forte's successor. He's a guy we can spell Matt with on third down and long. He'll play some ST's too. Odd pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradjock Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 Langford seems like he has a similar skill set to Matt Forte. They may see him as his replacement for the 2016-2017 season. He's going to be 24 in December so he's probably only got a good 6 years in him to produce. Don't really like that. But for a 4th rounder, it's not that big of a deal. Disagree on both. I don't think we view him so much as a replacement as we do a #2 back and reduce the load. The fact he can do all the things Forte can is nice. If Forte continues to be great, I think we'll look to resign him. Also, with the age of 30, I think that's more about mileage and wear on the body then it is actual age. So his might be age 32. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 He was considered the best "all around" back in terms of blocking, receiving and running. Also good special teams background. Apparently we really don't like Kadeem Carey. I am STUNNED we've drafted offense with 3 of our first four picks. STUNNED. Then again, we signed 7 defensive FAs with maybe 5 starters. Drafted another starter in Goldman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 He was considered the best "all around" back in terms of blocking, receiving and running. Also good special teams background. Apparently we really don't like Kadeem Carey. I am STUNNED we've drafted offense with 3 of our first four picks. STUNNED. I'm not. I've been saying for a while that there were a ton of bodies on the DL and LB they need to figure out. You can't draft hole fillers unless you know where the holes are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 Meh, I do like Langford a lot, dudes fast. Not a big fan of going RB though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.