Stinger226 Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 I think there are 2-3 options, maybe one is worth our pick. Jimmy G makes a 4th option which I think SF somehow gets him if they hire McDaniels as HC. If that happens and Cleveland takes Garrett, then we get first choice. 1. Myles Garrett CLE 2. Leonard Fournette/Dalvin Cook SF (trade 2nd for JG) 3. What to do? Allen, QB, trade down. So are you saying we should draft a RB?, I dont think that is a glaring need for us. Before I would do that I would reach for a LT than none are rated top 10 this year but would fix a glaring need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 So are you saying we should draft a RB?, I dont think that is a glaring need for us. Before I would do that I would reach for a LT than none are rated top 10 this year but would fix a glaring need. No, I put a scenario start to the draft with CLE taking Garrett and SF taking one of the RBs. SF may hire McDaniels as HC and he may want Garappolo as the QB. I had them giving their high 2nd RD pick for him. That leaves the Bears with the choice of QB, Allen DL, or room to trade down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingtwig Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 No, I put a scenario start to the draft with CLE taking Garrett and SF taking one of the RBs. SF may hire McDaniels as HC and he may want Garappolo as the QB. I had them giving their high 2nd RD pick for him. That leaves the Bears with the choice of QB, Allen DL, or room to trade down. I honestly don't see SF taking a RB with the #2 pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chitownhustla Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 No, I put a scenario start to the draft with CLE taking Garrett and SF taking one of the RBs. SF may hire McDaniels as HC and he may want Garappolo as the QB. I had them giving their high 2nd RD pick for him. That leaves the Bears with the choice of QB, Allen DL, or room to trade down. Im reading this as SF trading their number 2 pick to NE for Jimmy G. Then picking a RB. I dont see this happening, one I dont see SF giving up their number 2 pick and I dont see NE trading up to the #2 spot and taking a RB, I cant remember them ever drafting a RB high, they usually find lower tier RB and make great use of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 Im reading this as SF trading their number 2 pick to NE for Jimmy G. Then picking a RB. I dont see this happening, one I dont see SF giving up their number 2 pick and I dont see NE trading up to the #2 spot and taking a RB, I cant remember them ever drafting a RB high, they usually find lower tier RB and make great use of them. They would be trading pick 2-34 for Garappolo in this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 They would be trading pick 2-34 for Garappolo in this. They have hyde and no qb, why would they do that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 They have hyde and no qb, why would they do that They would taje BPA then naybe trade but no rb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.