Trade Value Chart *Pinned for Draft*

[adam]

RD1		RD2		RD3		RD4		RD5		RD6		RD7
PK/TM		PK/TM		PK/TM		PK/TM		PK/TM		PK/TM		PK/TM
1  CIN	3000	33  CIN	580	65  CIN	265	107  CIN	80	147  CIN	31.4	180  CIN	18.2	215  CIN	4.2
2  WAS	2600	34  IND	560	66  WAS	260	108  WAS	78	148  CAR	31	181  DEN	17.8	216  WAS	3.8
3  DET	2200	35  DET	550	67  DET	255	109  DET	76	149  DET	30.6	182  DET	17.4	217  SF	3.4
4  NYG	1800	36  NYG	540	68  NYJ	250	110  NYG	74	150  NYG	30.2	183  NYG	17	218  NYG	3
5  MIA	1700	37  LAC	530	69  CAR	245	111  HOU	72	151  LAC	29.8	184  CAR	16.6	219  MIN	2.6
6  LAC	1600	38  CAR	520	70  MIA	240	112  LAC	70	152  CAR	29.4	185  MIA	16.2	220  LAC	2.3
7  CAR	1500	39  MIA	510	71  LAC	235	113  CAR	68	153  MIA	29	186  LAC	15.8	221  CAR	2
8  ARI	1400	40  HOU	500	72  ARI	230	114  ARI	66	154  MIA	28.6	187  CLE	15.4	222  ARI	1.7
9  JAX	1350	41  CLE	490	73  JAX	225	115  CLE	64	155  MIN	28.2	188  BUF	15	223  JAX	1.4
10  CLE	1300	42  JAX	480	74  CLE	220	116  JAX	62	156  SF	27.8	189  JAX	14.6	224  TEN	1.1
11  NYJ	1250	43  CHI	470	75  IND	215	117  TB	60	157  JAX	27.4	190  PHI	14.2	225  BAL	1
12  LV	1200	44  IND	460	76  TB	210	118  DEN	58	158  NYJ	27	191  NYJ	13.8	226  CHI	1
13  SF	1150	45  TB	450	77  DEN	205	119  ATL	56	159  LV	26.6	192  GB	13.4	227  MIA	1
14  TB	1100	46  DEN	440	78  ATL	200	120  NYJ	54	160  IND	26.2	193  IND	13	228  ATL	1
15  DEN	1050	47  ATL	430	79  NYJ	195	121  LV	52	161  TB	25.8	194  TB	12.6	229  WAS	1
16  ATL	1000	48  NYJ	420	80  LV	190	122  IND	50	162  WAS	25.4	195  NE	12.2	230  NE	1
17  DAL	950	49  PIT	410	81  LV	185	123  DAL	49	163  CHI	25	196  CHI	11.8	231  DAL	1
18  MIA	900	50  CHI	400	82  DAL	180	124  PIT	48	164  DAL	24.6	197  IND	11.4	232  PIT	1
19  LV	875	51  DAL	390	83  DEN	175	125  NE	47	165  JAX	24.2	198  PIT	11	233  CHI	1
20  JAX	850	52  LAR	380	84  LAR	170	126  LAR	46	166  DET	23.8	199  LAR	10.6	234  LAR	1
21  PHI	800	53  PHI	370	85  DET	165	127  PHI	45	167  BUF	23.4	200  CHI	10.2	235  DET	1
22  MIN	780	54  BUF	360	86  BUF	160	128  BUF	44	168  PHI	23	201  MIN	9.8	236  GB	1
23  NE	760	55  BAL	350	87  NE	155	129  BAL	43	169  NO	22.6	202  ARI	9.4	237  TEN	1
24  NO	740	56  MIA	340	88  NO	150	130  NO	42	170  BAL	22.2	203  NO	9	238  NYG	1
25  MIN	720	57  LAR	330	89  MIN	145	131  ARI	41	171  HOU	21.8	204  NE	8.6	239  BUF	1
26  MIA	700	58  MIN	320	90  HOU	140	132  MIN	40	172  NE	21.4	205  MIN	8.2	240  HOU	1
27  SEA	680	59  SEA	310	91  LV	136	133  SEA	39.5	173  MIA	21	206  JAX	7.8	241  NE	1
28  BAL	660	60  BAL	300	92  BAL	132	134  BAL	39	174  TEN	20.6	207  BUF	7.4	242  GB	1
29  TEN	640	61  TEN	292	93  TEN	128	135  PIT	38.5	175  GB	20.2	208  GB	7	243  TEN	1
30  GB	620	62  GB	284	94  GB	124	136  GB	38	176  SF	19.8	209  GB	6.6	244  CLE	1
31  SF	600	63  KC	276	95  DEN	120	137  JAX	37.5	177  KC	19.4	210  SF	6.2	245  SF	1
32  KC	590	64  SEA	270	96  KC	116	138  KC	37	178  DEN	19	211  NYJ	5.8	246  MIA	1
				97  CLE	112	139  TB	36.5	179  DAL	18.6	212  NE	5.4	247  NYG	1
				98  NE	108	140  JAX	36			213  NE	5	248  HOU	1
				99  NYG	104	141  MIA	35.5			214  SEA	4.6	249  MIN	1
				100  NE	100	142  WAS	35					250  HOU	1
				101  SEA	96	143  ATL	34.5					251  MIA	1
				102  PIT	92	144  SEA	34					252  DEN	1
				103  PHI	88	145  PHI	33.5					253  MIN	1
				104  LAR	86	146  PHI	33					254  DEN	1
				105  MIN	84							255  NYG	1
				106  BAL	82

[Stinger226]

Anybody here: 

Would you trade 43 for NE's 87- 98- 100  also a latter pick to try to  balance value ? 172

[BearFan PHX]

10 hours ago, Stinger226 said:

Anybody here: 

Would you trade 43 for NE's 87- 98- 100  also a latter pick to try to  balance value ? 172

It looks appetizing, and if you have good grades on players that are in that range, then you do the trade.

I worry about the falloff, and would prefer something where we trade 43 (or 50) for two picks, one no lower than 100 (or 70!), and the other within 10 slots of the first pick, and only if you get there and have enough equally graded picks available that you think youre still gonna get one of your guys with the lower pick.

So all in all, three picks looks juicy, but you might have to fall too far to get them? It would all depend on the board I guess.

[dawhizz]

10 hours ago, Stinger226 said:

Anybody here: 

Would you trade 43 for NE's 87- 98- 100  also a latter pick to try to  balance value ? 172

I'd rather do it for 50.  Grab a guy you love that's still on the board at 43 and then trade down.

[adam]

11 hours ago, Stinger226 said:

Anybody here: 

Would you trade 43 for NE's 87- 98- 100  also a latter pick to try to  balance value ? 172

Without knowing if you would even have a trade partner at 50, you almost have to take it to give you 4 picks in the top 100. 

[Stinger226]

I am using the PROFOOTBALLNETWORK mock for trade values, don't know how realistic but I can always get a trade with NE for 43 but they refuse the 50 trade.  

In this scenario we have 50-87-98-100. That would be  the only trade that would give me 4 top 100. I also always get a Cincinnati trade for 50 for 65- 107- 180 

65-87-98-100-107 is the best I could get.

That 2 trade option gets me 5 in top 107. I tried every trade scenario with every team and that 2 trades got me the most. 

I would say after the first 40 players, the next 70 probably doesn't have much difference in values through those picks. 

For example: Jeremy Chinn has been anywhere  rated 45 -54-58-73. So lots of different draft sites vary with values of players.  

My last draft got me at

65- Duggar/ SS

87 - Matt Peart/ OT

98- Devin Duvenary/"WR 

100- Claypool/ figured at TE

107- Antonio Gibson RB/ WR 

That's a lot of speed. 

 

[dawhizz]

Looking at the chart, I can definitely see Pace loving done still on his board when the first round is over and offering 43 and 50 to Cincy for 33, 65, and 147.