Iguana Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 http://www.670thescore.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 listening right now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Please give updates, if possible. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 competition will be brought in at RB. OLine was disappointing, well duh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 He said Mike Brown won't be relied on but would like to have him back. He is focusing on needs this offseason and not luxuries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 competition will be brought in at RB. Really? Hopefully it is not just a threat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 He said Mike Brown won't be relied on but would like to have him back. He is focusing on needs this offseason and not luxuries. Even more specific on Brown - he said "How can I depend on Mike Brown?" Obviously, he can't and will look to upgrade. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 He didn't rule out using the franchise tag on Berrian. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 oh yeah, Lovie has all control over the assistan coaches and coordinators. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Sounds like Lovie has control of his coaching staff ('Lovie has to be comfortable with his coaching staff - it's his call'). Competition at QB and RB. Would like to see Rex back. Will not rule out using the tag on Berrian. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Mulligan brings up a good point about how when Lovie first came he had little power over the assistant coaches with how he wanted Babich as his DC but JA said no and brought in Rivera. Now it's completely different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Also, the reason why Beekman and Hass did not play was because they did not give us the best chance to win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 He also said he felt we had the WRs to be successful and the issue on offense was the running game (we have to be a running team - scheme and play need to improve). Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfoligno Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Question on his Brown comments, I saw where he said, "how can I count on Brown" and was wondering if that was something he simply said, or if he was repeating a question posed by a reporter. While the comment is understandable, I think it is also a bit insulting. Through all Rex' injuries, I do not recall him ever making a comment like this. I simply wondered if a reporter flat out asked if he can count on Mike Brown, and Angelo began his answer by repeating the questioner's words. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfoligno Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 One thing he said that makes me sick, From what I read, he said our defense is not set up to stop the run. Sorry, but that simply makes me sick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LT2_3 Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 One thing he said that makes me sick, From what I read, he said our defense is not set up to stop the run. Sorry, but that simply makes me sick. A couple points of clarification: Angelo said that our defense is not designed to be a run stuffing team. I'm pretty sure he wasn't implying that he expects them to suck at it, but just that the scheme isn't oriented around that like one would if they have 2 buddas at DT. As for the Mike Brown comment, it WAS in repsonse to a question. He was specifically asked if he could count on Mike Brown. The key to me in that exchange was that he wants Mike back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Bears 88 Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Also, the reason why Beekman and Hass did not play was because they did not give us the best chance to win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 A couple points of clarification: Angelo said that our defense is not designed to be a run stuffing team. I'm pretty sure he wasn't implying that he expects them to suck at it, but just that the scheme isn't oriented around that like one would if they have 2 buddas at DT. As for the Mike Brown comment, it WAS in repsonse to a question. He was specifically asked if he could count on Mike Brown. The key to me in that exchange was that he wants Mike back. I remember both of those from his comments. It was fairly clear, however, that he realizes he cannot depend on Brown and needs to have an adequate answer available. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfoligno Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Angelo said that our defense is not designed to be a run stuffing team. I'm pretty sure he wasn't implying that he expects them to suck at it, but just that the scheme isn't oriented around that like one would if they have 2 buddas at DT. I understand that, but one of my biggest issues w/ Lovie's D has always been our ability to stop the run. If you go back to when Lovie was running the D in StL, his D's were always weak against the run. He got away w/ it more there because Stl was putting up 30 points in the first half, and teams had to abandon the run. But how well the defense (scheme) defends the run has always been a sore point of mine. As for the Mike Brown comment, it WAS in repsonse to a question. He was specifically asked if he could count on Mike Brown. The key to me in that exchange was that he wants Mike back. Thank you. I pretty much thought as much. It seemed like too great of an insult to Brown. As for keeping Brown, I am for it for the most part, though I want to go into the offseason w/ the plan on trying to replace him. But adding two safeties is not easy, and I keep Brown unless we do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Thanks for the recaps. Still would've liked to have seen Hass in on a few snaps. Brown should be kept, but really needs to work out a better contract for both sides. Brown also made the run defense look a lot better - somehow. Grossman coming back has to be a longshot. He is probably better off getting a fresh start somewhere else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Agreed...espcially on Hass. I really fault Lovie for that. They should have found a series or 2 for the guy. It's borderline silly. Same with Beekman. I'm convinced Lovie has lost some brain cells...or he thinks the entire fan base are idiots. I'm generally insulted by everything that now comes out of his mouth. Angelo's responses seemed genuine, thoughtful, and made sense. I aslo agree on Brown. I really want him back. He just needs to be restructured and used more sparingly. Ditto on Grossman. I think he wants out more than anything. With teams like Miami, Baltimore, Minny, SF, etc...potentially looking for QB's, there should be interest for him elsewhere. Thanks for the recaps. Still would've liked to have seen Hass in on a few snaps. Brown should be kept, but really needs to work out a better contract for both sides. Brown also made the run defense look a lot better - somehow. Grossman coming back has to be a longshot. He is probably better off getting a fresh start somewhere else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 edit: test post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABEARSDABOMB Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 I remember both of those from his comments. It was fairly clear, however, that he realizes he cannot depend on Brown and needs to have an adequate answer available. Peace Isn't Rex' injury the reason the Bears ended up bringing Griese in as a backup. Basically Angelo knew he couldn't continue to count on Rex given the history and brought in some competition. I expect the Bears to bring a backup RB, resign Berrian (or make a hard push at doing so, maybe even franchising him, which will allow the Bears to get value via a draft pick for him), bring in a starting safety (who will take one of the safety spots with Brown being the other spot and Manning/McGowan/Payne backing up), and upgrade the oline. Aside from that I don't think the Bears will do anything too drastic and I hope they have a killer draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingtwig Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Good, now hopefully he can figure what our needs our like OLINE OLINE OLINE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Good, now hopefully he can figure what our needs our like OLINE OLINE OLINE. Good to see you posting. Hope everything is good with the baby!!!! Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.