adam Posted December 16 Report Share Posted December 16 I have seen some people suggesting this, but knowing what the Bears gave up for Mack, at the end of the day, I don't know if 2x 1st rounders would be worth it knowing how much help the OL needs. What do you think? If the Bears offered up their next 2x 1st rounders, would you trade for Parsons? I wouldn't because the Bears need to build with the draft, and I would rather they gain draft capital than trade it away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted December 16 Report Share Posted December 16 36 minutes ago, adam said: I have seen some people suggesting this, but knowing what the Bears gave up for Mack, at the end of the day, I don't know if 2x 1st rounders would be worth it knowing how much help the OL needs. What do you think? If the Bears offered up their next 2x 1st rounders, would you trade for Parsons? I wouldn't because the Bears need to build with the draft, and I would rather they gain draft capital than trade it away. I dont think they are trading all that high draft capital to pay a star 30 mil a yr. Poles has maintained good cap situation since getting here and to many holes to fill on both side of the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASHKUM BEAR Posted December 16 Report Share Posted December 16 3 hours ago, adam said: I have seen some people suggesting this, but knowing what the Bears gave up for Mack, at the end of the day, I don't know if 2x 1st rounders would be worth it knowing how much help the OL needs. What do you think? If the Bears offered up their next 2x 1st rounders, would you trade for Parsons? I wouldn't because the Bears need to build with the draft, and I would rather they gain draft capital than trade it away. No, the Bears need to use their resources to make sure their franchise player has the talent around him to make him flourish. Once we have an offense capable of playing with the best, we can figure out the defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted December 16 Report Share Posted December 16 No way. This draft is too deep in edge rushers to waste away two top picks and cap space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted December 16 Report Share Posted December 16 Probably not anymore. We're too far away from contending to be making "go for it" deals right now. Unless I can get McVay, Shanahan, or Stefanski, I'm holding on to those draft picks to rebuild this OL and DL lines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearFan PHX Posted December 16 Report Share Posted December 16 2 hours ago, Bears4Ever_34 said: Probably not anymore. We're too far away from contending to be making "go for it" deals right now. Unless I can get McVay, Shanahan, or Stefanski, I'm holding on to those draft picks to rebuild this OL and DL lines. right. HC, and the lines are our needs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABEARSDABOMB Posted Monday at 10:41 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 10:41 PM 11 hours ago, adam said: I have seen some people suggesting this, but knowing what the Bears gave up for Mack, at the end of the day, I don't know if 2x 1st rounders would be worth it knowing how much help the OL needs. What do you think? If the Bears offered up their next 2x 1st rounders, would you trade for Parsons? I wouldn't because the Bears need to build with the draft, and I would rather they gain draft capital than trade it away. Absolutely not - they need to fix both lines - but priority 1 has to be the oline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted Tuesday at 01:45 AM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:45 AM Please, no. Parsons is a head case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.