GrizzlyBear Posted August 29, 2008 Report Share Posted August 29, 2008 here it is http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune....s-cut-okwo.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted August 29, 2008 Report Share Posted August 29, 2008 Mercy those were some disastrous draft picks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Bears 88 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 I'll be shocked if Bradley gets cut. Then again, who knows with this team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 I'll be shocked if Bradley gets cut. Then again, who knows with this team. Wow- we agree. We'd all love to think he can be a productive player, but his inconsistent hands and his inability to stay healthy leads me to believe he'll have a spot on this team, but if we get deeper this offseason at the WR position, he'll be out. He is just a liability. If the season gets out of hand, I hope he can stay healthy and prove us all wrong that he can be a good player in the league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 The Bazuin pick just totally upsets me because we wasted that when we could have had Oline help. Same goes for Okwo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 The Bazuin pick just totally upsets me because we wasted that when we could have had Oline help. Same goes for Okwo. I know that maybe if one of those guys would have came to the Bears it could have been a different story, but if you look at the guys picked after Bazuin, nobody stands out as a current good player. Bazuin will get picked up soon, and the same goes for Okwo. Bazuin has the potential, however, Okwo is too small, IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParkerBear7 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 Here are a few options in BOLD the Bears should have considered in the 2007 instead of Baziun & Okwo! 33. Arizona (from Oakland) Alan Branch, DT Michigan 34. Buffalo (from Detroit) - Paul Posluszny, LB Penn State 35. Tampa Bay - Arron Sears, OT/OG Tennessee 36. Philadelphia (from Cleveland thru Dallas) - Kevin Kolb, QB Houston 37. San Diego (from Washington thru NY Jets and Chicago) - Eric Weddle, S Utah 38. Oakland (from Arizona) - Zach Miller, TE Arizona State 39. Atlanta (from Houston) - Justin Blalock, OG Texas 40. Miami - John Beck, QB BYU 41. Atlanta (from Minnesota) - Chris Houston, CB Arkansas 42. Indianapolis (from San Francisco)-Tony Ugoh, OT/OG Arkansas This should have been our 2nd rd pick at #37! 43. Detroit (from Buffalo) - Drew Stanton, QB Michigan State 44. Minnesota (from Atlanta) - Sidney Rice, WR South Carolina 45. Carolina - Dwayne Jarrett, WR USC 46. Pittsburgh - LeMarr Woodley, DE Michigan 47. New York Jets (from Green Bay) - David Harris, LB Michigan 48. Jacksonville - Justin Durant, LB Hampton 49. Cincinnati - Kenny Irons, RB Auburn 50. Tennessee - Chris Henry, RB Arizona 51. New York Giants - Steve Smith, WR USC 52. St. Louis - Brian Leonard, RB Rutgers 53. Cleveland (from Dallas) - Eric Wright, CB UNLV 54. Kansas City - Claude "Turk" McBride, DE/DT Tennessee 55. Seattle - Josh Wilson, CB Maryland 56. Denver - Tim Crowder, DE Texas 57. Philadelphia - Victor Abiamiri, DE Notre Dame 58. Detroit (from New Orleans) - Ikaika Alama-Francis, DE Hawaii 59. Carolina (from New York Jets) - Ryan Kalil, C USC 60. Miami (from New England) - Samson Satele, C Hawaii 61. Detroit (from Baltimore) - Gerald Alexander, S Boise State 62. Chicago (from San Diego) - Dan Bazuin, DE Central Michigan 63. Green Bay (from Chicago thru NY Jets) - Brandon Jackson, RB Nebraska 64. Tampa Bay (from Indianapolis) - Sabby Piscitelli, SS/LB Oregon State Third Round 65. Oakland - Quentin Moses, DE Georgia -- would have been a better option than Bazuin 66. New Orleans (from Detroit) - Usama Young, CB Kent State 67. Dallas (from Cleveland) - James Marten, OT Boston College 68. Tampa Bay - Quincy Black, LB New Mexico 69. Arizona - Buster Davis, LB Florida State 70. Denver (from Washington) - Ryan Harris, OT Notre Dame 71. Miami - Lorenzo Booker, RB Florida State 72. Minnesota - Marcus McCauley, CB Fresno State 73. Houston - Jacoby Jones, WR Lane 74. Baltimore (from Buffalo thru Detroit) - Yamon Figurs, WR Kansas State 75. Atlanta - Laurent Robinson, WR Illinois State 76. San Francisco - Jason Hill, WR Washingtin State 77. Pittsburgh - Matt Spaeth, TE Minnesota 78. Green Bay - James Jones, WR San Jose State 79. Jacksonville - Mike Walker, WR Central Florida 80. Tennessee - Paul Williams, WR Fresno State 81. New York Giants - Jay Alford, DT Penn State 82. Kansas City (from St. Louis) - DeMarcus "Tank" Tyler, DT North Carolina State 83. Carolina - Charles Johnson, DE Georgia 84. St. Louis (from Kansas City) - Jonathan Wade, CB Tennessee 85. Seattle - Brandon Mebane, DT California 86. Baltimore (from Denver thru Jacksonville) - Marshal Yanda, OT/OG Iowa 87. Philadelphia (from Dallas) - Stewart Bradley, LB Nebraska 88. New Orleans - Andy Alleman, OG Akron 89. Green Bay (from New York Jets) - Aaron Rouse, S Virginia Tech 90. Philadelphia - Tony Hunt, RB Penn State 91. Oakland (from New England) - Mario Henderson, OT Florida State 92. Buffalo (from Baltimore) - Trent Edwards, QB Stanford 93. Chicago (from San Diego) - Garrett Wolf, RB Northern Illinois 94. Chicago - Michael Okwo, LB Stanford 95. Indianapolis - Daymeion Hughes, CB California 96. San Diego (compensatory) - Anthony Waters, LB Clemson 97. San Francisco (compensatory) - Ray McDonald, DE/DT Florida 98. Indianapolis (compensatory) - Quinn Pitcock, DT Ohio State 99. Oakland (compensatory) - Johnnie Lee Higgins, WR UTEP Fourth Round 100. Oakland - Michael Bush, RB Louisville 101. Jacksonville (from Detroit thru Baltimore) - Adam Podlesh P Maryland 102. Minnesota (from Tampa Bay) - Brian Robison, DE Texas 103. Dallas (from Cleveland) - Isaiah Stanback, QB Washington 104. San Francisco (from Washington) - Jay Moore, DE Nebraska 105. Detroit (from Arizona thru Oakland) - A.J. Davis, CB North Carolina State 106. Tampa Bay (from Minnesota) - Tanard Jackson, CB Syracuse 107. New Orleans (from Houston) - Antonio Pittman, RB Ohio State 108. Miami - Paul Soliai, DT Utah 109. Atlanta - Stephen Nicholas, LB South Florida 110. Oakland (from San Francisco thru New England) - John Bowie, CB Cincinnati 111. Buffalo - Dwayne Wright, RB Fresno State 112. Pittsburgh (from Green Bay) - Daniel Sepulveda, P Baylor 113. Jacksonville - Brian Smith, DE Missouri 114. Cincinnati - Marvin White, S Texas Christian 115. Tennessee - Leroy Harris, C North Carolina State 116. New York Giants - Zak DeOssie, LB Brown 117. Detroit (from St. Louis) - Manuel Ramirez, OG Texas Tech 118. Carolina - Ryne Robinson, WR Miami (OH) 119. Green Bay (from Pittsburgh) - Allen Barbre, OT Missouri Southern 120. Seattle - Baraka Atkins, DT Miami (FL) 121. Denver (from Denver thru Atlanta and Minnesota) - Marcus Thomas, DT Florida 122. Dallas - Doug Free, OT Northern Illinois 123. Houston (from Kansas City thru New Orleans) - Fred Bennett, CB South Carolina 124. Seattle (from NY Jets thru San Francisco) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 pretty good 2nd and 3rd round picks there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParkerBear7 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 pretty good 2nd and 3rd round picks there What makes me more frustrated is that Tony Ugoh was projected in the combine as an athletic starting LT prospect and while the team new they had an aging OL the Bears got cute and traded down for a guy that they just cut! Ugoh could be starting at LT this season after replacing Miller last season at RT. Then they copuld have added Braden Albert this year instead of Williams and plugged him in at LG but what do I know I am no draft guru! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesson44 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 Well here's one for you.......we will see how well Tony Ugoh does this week when we play the Colts. He's their starting tackle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfoligno Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 What makes me more frustrated is that Tony Ugoh was projected in the combine as an athletic starting LT prospect and while the team new they had an aging OL the Bears got cute and traded down for a guy that they just cut! Not just Ugoh. I was screaming for Blalock too. Blalock, Ugoh, and one other (can't recall now who) were who I was really wanting to see. Blalock by the way became a starter at LG. Not a position we need or anything. And whats up w/ Ugoh. You think we need a LT? Ugoh could be starting at LT this season after replacing Miller last season at RT. Then they copuld have added Braden Albert this year instead of Williams and plugged him in at LG but what do I know I am no draft guru! Albert is who I wanted this year too. As I saw it, Albert had HUGE upside at LT. I also felt his floor was upper tier OG. Both are positions we need, so he seemed like a win/win situation. Williams I feared was LT or bust, and felt he was too finese for a run first team. Think Blake Brockemeyer. That's not a bad thing, but no close to what I felt Albert could be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesson44 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 It funny you guys are in love with both Braden Albert and Chris Williams and aren't they both like HURT and not playing right now!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfoligno Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 It funny you guys are in love with both Braden Albert and Chris Williams and aren't they both like HURT and not playing right now!!! Sorry, but do you really not see the difference? Williams suffered a major injury related to a previous problem, known at draft time. Albert, to my understanding, has a minor injury that is not thought to be very serious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selection7 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 On the flipside, JA finally got a 1st round pick really right but missed on the 2nd and 3rd rounders (one of 'em). Is that preferrable to the opposite situation, which was Jerry Angelo's old M.O.? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesson44 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 It funny you guys are in love with both Braden Albert and Chris Williams and aren't they both like HURT and not playing right now!!! Sorry, but do you really not see the difference? Williams suffered a major injury related to a previous problem, known at draft time. Albert, to my understanding, has a minor injury that is not thought to be very serious. yes i see the point but hurt and not playing are still the same for both players. So did Albert tell the Chiefs he had bad ankles? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selection7 Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 Some of you already knew this but there's a suntimes article pointing out that Bazuin was hurt during rookie camp last year and has had injury issues ever since, according to Bazuin himself. JA can't be held responsible for that stuff, which happens to every GM's draft picks once in a while...Chris Williams is of course possible another thing all together. http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/be...-bear30.article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 I fail to see why we would keep Toenia instead of Bazuin... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 Also, Ugoh is overrated. If he played for the Bears, he'd likely not be that good... however, he was put in the completely perfect situation with the Colts. The Colts could make any bad-mediocre OLineman and turn them into all-pros. And I don't blame us for the trade down, we got a ton of value for that pick. It was poor execution with the picks though... even though I think we should have kept Bazuin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesson44 Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 I fail to see why we would keep Toenia instead of Bazuin... That is a no brainer. Toenia can rush the passer from the middle, he is a bid body against the run and oh might I add this...he has not been hurt since he has been with the Bears and came at a much cheaper price too. Now Bazuin came to the team hurt and has been for the last two years and you say you fail to see why we would keep Toenia? I we didn't keep him I would have kept Baldwin instead of Bazuin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemonej Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 I agree about Toeina and I am a little surprised they kept him with Harrison and Idonije in the mix inside. As for Bazuin when was he going to play? Ogunleye,A.Brown,Anderson and Idonije will get most of the PT at end so that points to depth in the middle being more important where the Bears rotate players a lot.With Harris and Dusty coming back from injury you need another body inside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfoligno Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 Sorry, but I disagree. Look at our roster. We are loaded at DE. Last year and this year, there was simply no reason to draft another DE. Even if he did get healthy, and showed a glimmer here and there, when would we play him? Despite all the talk about a rotation, we generally do not use more than 3 in that rotation. If we were talking about an OL Angelo drafted that just couldn't stay healthy (and no signs of injury potential in college), then it would be harder to blame him. But he drafted a player that simply didn't come close to filling a need. He ignored big needs to draft a 4th DE. DAY ONE! Yes, I can blame Angelo. This was as bad of a pick then as it is now. Some of you already knew this but there's a suntimes article pointing out that Bazuin was hurt during rookie camp last year and has had injury issues ever since, according to Bazuin himself. JA can't be held responsible for that stuff, which happens to every GM's draft picks once in a while...Chris Williams is of course possible another thing all together. http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/be...-bear30.article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixote Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 Sorry, but I disagree. Look at our roster. We are loaded at DE. Last year and this year, there was simply no reason to draft another DE. Even if he did get healthy, and showed a glimmer here and there, when would we play him? Despite all the talk about a rotation, we generally do not use more than 3 in that rotation. If we were talking about an OL Angelo drafted that just couldn't stay healthy (and no signs of injury potential in college), then it would be harder to blame him. But he drafted a player that simply didn't come close to filling a need. He ignored big needs to draft a 4th DE. DAY ONE! Yes, I can blame Angelo. This was as bad of a pick then as it is now. I think it was a matter of Angelo feeling he had to draft a player because of need instead of the best player available which is what he usually tries to do. I heard on the Score a discussion about the drafting of Okwo & Bazuin. Going into that draft JA thought he would be losing A Brown & L Briggs. He felt he needed to draft do to "projected needs" at those positions. Now we see what can happen when you draft for need over BPA. You can come up empty a lot as did the Bears. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfoligno Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 I think it was a matter of Angelo feeling he had to draft a player because of need instead of the best player available which is what he usually tries to do. I heard on the Score a discussion about the drafting of Okwo & Bazuin. Going into that draft JA thought he would be losing A Brown & L Briggs. He felt he needed to draft do to "projected needs" at those positions. Now we see what can happen when you draft for need over BPA. You can come up empty a lot as did the Bears. I understand what you are saying, but here is the problem i have w/ that. We have "actual" needs, and what you are talking about is "potential" needs. Further, they were "potential" needs based on players who were not FAs, and were under our control. They may have been griping, but they were none-the-less under our control. This year, at the time of the draft, Urlacher was a very unhappy guy, or so he told the media. Situation was similar to our past w/ Briggs. Urlacher may not have been as harsh in his words, but retirement talk was enough to put it on the same level for me. Anyway, the point is, would Urlacher's talk have made LB a 1st day need this year? I don't think so. For me, what it still comes back to is (a) Angelo simply prefers defense and ( Angelo sees more potential in defensive players than offense. I think the 2nd point is partially at least because he isn't a good offensive evaluator, thus defensive players will often look better than offensive in his eyes. We should have been going offense w/ those picks, but didn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selection7 Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 If we were talking about an OL Angelo drafted that just couldn't stay healthy (and no signs of injury potential in college), then it would be harder to blame him. But he drafted a player that simply didn't come close to filling a need. He ignored big needs to draft a 4th DE. DAY ONE! Yes, I can blame Angelo. This was as bad of a pick then as it is now. So even if Bazuin had turned out well, you have a problem with his draft pick as a matter of principle because it nevertheless had a low percentage of success (due to us being stacked at DE). OK. I can somewhat accept that. I think need and best player available is a balancing act. Just remember that even if A.Brown had been sure to stick around, at this time last year he was coming off a poor season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 What a waste of two draft picks.... But I'm not surprised they were cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.