Connorbear Posted October 12, 2008 Report Share Posted October 12, 2008 http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/footb...0,587665.column Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenom283 Posted October 12, 2008 Report Share Posted October 12, 2008 http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/footb...0,587665.column Peace Wrong he failed because his huge vagina made it hard for him to run correct routes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesson44 Posted October 12, 2008 Report Share Posted October 12, 2008 Wrong he failed because his huge vagina made it hard for him to run correct routes. You should lay off Bradley he is a good WR when used right. It's funny that he can't play the Z and only the X position with the Bears which makes him a bad WR,but KC Chiefs have him playing the Z. That's like the Raiders saying Moss is no good then trade him to the Patriots and he scores 23 TD in the next year and the Pats are in the Super Bowl. Its just how you use the Guy. Hell Bradley made some great catches and had long TD runs....when we threw him the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrizzlyBear Posted October 12, 2008 Report Share Posted October 12, 2008 he is actually the type of reciever that Al davis covets. Long ball Reciever. In a west coast he dont fit plain and simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted October 12, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2008 You should lay off Bradley he is a good WR when used right. It's funny that he can't play the Z and only the X position with the Bears which makes him a bad WR,but KC Chiefs have him playing the Z. That's like the Raiders saying Moss is no good then trade him to the Patriots and he scores 23 TD in the next year and the Pats are in the Super Bowl. Its just how you use the Guy. Hell Bradley made some great catches and had long TD runs....when we threw him the ball. He was a wasted pick. For whatever reason, he got in Lovie's doghouse and wasn't coming out. I only wish we had taken an o-lineman in that spot. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted October 12, 2008 Report Share Posted October 12, 2008 He was a wasted pick. For whatever reason, he got in Lovie's doghouse and wasn't coming out. I only wish we had taken an o-lineman in that spot. Peace But is that a knock on Bradley, Lovie (and OC), or both? Considering the fact that the Bears' WRs haven't been tearing up the league, I'd have to say that it is at the very least a shared fault. Of course, I was a fan of Bradley's (when not injured) for some time, and felt all he really needed was a chance to shine. Because, let's be honest, when the dude was on the field and the ball made it his way, he looked fast, strong, and big. But when you only see one or two balls thrown your way a game, it's tough to get out of a doghouse that doesn't exactly have a wide door for success. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.