ASHKUM BEAR Posted January 27, 2009 Report Share Posted January 27, 2009 First off, congrats to Obama! Second, this article shows that GW put his country before himself with the war on Iraq. He took a lot of criticism and I think a lot of American's should at least consider what he did and give him some credit. Subject: Bush FINALLY vindicated on WMD in Iraq ... > > > > .... > > > > A national defense analyst says President Bush should be commended for > > keeping quiet about a discovery that could have blown his critics out > > of the water. > > > > Retired Major General Jerry Curry is a decorated combat veteran who > > served as an Army aviator, paratrooper, and Ranger during a military > > career that began during the Korean conflict. He recently wrote about > > a very under reported story by the Associated Press. > > > > According to the report, a large stockpile of concentrated natural > > Uranium, known as "yellowcake," reached a Canadian port to complete a > > top secret U.S. Operation that included a two-week airlift from > > Baghdad , and a ship voyage crossing two oceans. The Uranium material > > had been housed at a former Iraqi nuclear complex 12 miles from > > Baghdad . > > > > Curry says the president kept mum about the discovery in order to keep > > terrorists in the dark. "He made a very brave stand, a resolute > > stand..., in which he decided that he wasn't going to blab everything > > to the press," Curry commends. "...And in the meantime while he kept > > it quiet, he was buying time from the terrorists to get all that stuff > > out of the country. So that's what was done -- he just very quietly > > kept his mouth shut." > > > > "The press beat him to death for the last several years," he > > continues, "and now it turns out that, yes, there were weapons of mass > > destruction...." Curry also maintains that Saddam Hussein had an > > active nuclear program and the material could have been made into a > > nuclear weapon. > > > > President Bush's actions took courage, he notes, and all Americans > > should be thankful to have such a brave president who puts the welfare > > of the American people above personal considerations. > > > ........................................................................... > > > > On July 5, 2008 , the Associated Press (AP) released a story titled: > > Secret U.S. mission hauls uranium from Iraq . The opening paragraph is > > as follows: > > The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program (a huge > > stockpile of concentrated natural uranium) reached a Canadian port > > Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week > > airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans. > > > > See anything wrong with this picture? > > > > We have been hearing from the far left for more than five years how > > Bush lied. Somehow, that slogan loses its credibility now that 550 > > metric tons of Saddam's yellowcake, used for nuclear weapon enrichmet, > > has been discovered and shipped to Canada for its new use as nuclear > > energy. > > > > It appears that American troops found the 550 metric tons of uranium > > in 2003 after invading Iraq . They had to sit on this information and > > the uranium itself for fear of terrorists attempting to steal it. It > > was guarded and kept safe by our military in a 23,000-acre site with > > large sand berms surrounding the site. > > > > This is vindication for the Bush administration, having been attacked > > mercilessly by the liberal media and the far-left pundits on the blogo- > > sphere. Now that it is proven that President Bush did not lie about > > Saddam's nuclear ambitions, one would think that the mainstream media > > would report the true story. Once the AP released the story, the > > mainstream media should have picked it up and broadcast it worldwide. > > > > That never happened, due in large part, I believe, to the fact that > > the mainstream media would have to admit they were wrong about Bush's > > war motives all along. Thankfully, the AP got it right when it said, > > "The removal of 550 metric tons of yellowcake, the seed material for > > higher-grade nuclear enrichment, was a significant step toward closing > > the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy." > > > > Closing the book on Saddam's nuclear legacy? Did Saddam have a nuclear > > legacy after all? I thought Bush lied? As it turns out, the people who > > lied were Joe Wilson and his wife. > > > > Valerie Plame engaged in a clear case of nepotism and convinced the > > CIA to send her husband on a fact finding mission in February 2002, > > seeking to determine if Saddam Hussein attempted to buy yellowcake > > from Niger . The CIA and British intelligence believed Saddam > > contacted Niger for that purpose but needed proof. > > > > During his trip to Niger , Wilson actually interviewed the former > > prime minister of Niger , Ibrahim Assane Mayaki. Mayaki told Wilson > > that in June of 1999, an Iraqi delegation expressed interest in > > "expanding commercial relations" for the purposes of purchasing > > yellowcake. > > > > Wilson chose to overlook Mahaki's remarks and reported to the CIA that > > there was no evidence of Hussein wanting to purchase yellow cake from > > Niger . > > > > However, with British intelligence insisting the claim was true, > > President Bush used that same claim in his State of the Union address > > in January of 2003. Outraged by Bush's insistence that the claim was > > true, Wilson wrote an op-ed in the New York Times in the summer of > > 2003 slamming Bush. > > > > Wilson did this in spite of the fact that Mayaki said Saddam did try > > to buy the yellowcake from Niger . The Senate Select Committee on > > Intelligence disagreed with Wilson and supported Mayaki's claim. This > > meant nothing to Wilson who was opposed to the Iraq war and thus had > > ulterior motives in covering up the prime minister's statements. > > > > It was a simple tactic, really. If the far-left and their friends in > > the media could prove Bush lied about Hussein wanting to purchase > > yellowcake from Niger , it would undermine President Bush's credibility and give them more cause for asking what other lies he may > > have told. > > > > Yet the real lie came from Wilson, who interpreted his own meaning > > from the prime minister's statements and concluded all by himself that > > the claim of Saddam attempting to purchase yellowcake was "unequivocally wrong." Curiously the CIA sat on this information and > > did not inform the CIA Director, who sided with Bush on the yellowcake > > claim. This was made public in a bipartisan Senate Intelligence > > Committee report in July 2004. > > > > Valerie Plame also engaged in her own lie campaign by spreading the > > notion that the Bush Administration outed her as a CIA agent. Never > > mind that it was Richard Armitage - no friend of the Bush > > administration - who leaked Plame's identity to the press. Never mind > > that Plame had not been in the field as a CIA agent in some six years. > > > > The truth is, due to their opposition to the war, Joe Wilson, Valerie > > Plame, the mainstream media, and their left-wing friends on the blogo- > > sphere engaged in a propaganda campaign to undermine the Bush > > administration. Now that Saddam's uranium has been made public and is > > no longer a threat to the world, do you think these aforementioned > > parties will apologize and admit they were wrong? > > > > Don't count on it. > > > > The rest of the American people should hear the truth about Saddam's > > uranium. It is up to you and me to inform them. > > > > As far as the anti-war crowd is concerned, the next time they say that > > Bush lied, we should tell them to "have the yellowcake and eat it too." > > > > For verification of this information, click on these > links: > > > > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/ > > > > > http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/u/uraniumyellowcake.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted February 12, 2009 Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 From the truth of fiction link you provided - "The news report went on to say that the yellowcake "had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War. There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991". From the MSNBC link: Israeli warplanes bombed a reactor project at the site in 1981. Later, U.N. inspectors documented and safeguarded the yellowcake, which had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War. There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991, the official said. This yellowcake had been there since before the 1st Gulf war and had been documented at that time. This is nothing new and does not let GWB off the hook. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted February 12, 2009 Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 Connor, Good investigating... We need you onto the economic crisis now! Sleuth away! From the truth of fiction link you provided - "The news report went on to say that the yellowcake "had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War. There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991". From the MSNBC link: Israeli warplanes bombed a reactor project at the site in 1981. Later, U.N. inspectors documented and safeguarded the yellowcake, which had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War. There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991, the official said. This yellowcake had been there since before the 1st Gulf war and had been documented at that time. This is nothing new and does not let GWB off the hook. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted February 12, 2009 Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 Connor, Good investigating... We need you onto the economic crisis now! Sleuth away! Thanks. Unfortunately, I do not believe either the Dems or the Republicans will be able to fix the debacle we are currently in. Time for all of us to pay the check.... Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 I actually think you are quite right. There's a theory called somthing like "unintended consequences". Which basically means, no matter the good intentions of what's being done, more harm can happen. My dad, who is quite savvy in ecenomics, feels massive inflation will be hitting and that we were better off letting the banks and car companies fail. His thought is that it's like ripping off a band-aid. If you do it fast, it hurts a bit more, the pain lasts shorter. Whereas, when you pull it off slow...it hurts a little less, but drags on for a while longer. I think we're in the slow drag... Thanks. Unfortunately, I do not believe either the Dems or the Republicans will be able to fix the debacle we are currently in. Time for all of us to pay the check.... Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 I actually think you are quite right. There's a theory called somthing like "unintended consequences". Which basically means, no matter the good intentions of what's being done, more harm can happen. My dad, who is quite savvy in ecenomics, feels massive inflation will be hitting and that we were better off letting the banks and car companies fail. His thought is that it's like ripping off a band-aid. If you do it fast, it hurts a bit more, the pain lasts shorter. Whereas, when you pull it off slow...it hurts a little less, but drags on for a while longer. I think we're in the slow drag... Thanks. Unfortunately, I do not believe either the Dems or the Republicans will be able to fix the debacle we are currently in. Time for all of us to pay the check.... Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 I actually think you are quite right. There's a theory called somthing like "unintended consequences". Which basically means, no matter the good intentions of what's being done, more harm can happen. My dad, who is quite savvy in ecenomics, feels massive inflation will be hitting and that we were better off letting the banks and car companies fail. His thought is that it's like ripping off a band-aid. If you do it fast, it hurts a bit more, the pain lasts shorter. Whereas, when you pull it off slow...it hurts a little less, but drags on for a while longer. I think we're in the slow drag... Thanks. Unfortunately, I do not believe either the Dems or the Republicans will be able to fix the debacle we are currently in. Time for all of us to pay the check.... Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.