fudgeripple2000 Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Would we have any interest in Holt or Pace? http://www.rotoworld.com/content/HeadLines...L&hl=138939 Holt: Good hands and with his age isn't as much of a deep threat as he once was. For other teams that would be a problem. But with a dink and dunk offense that focuses on accuracy and has limited creativity. Holt would allow Lloyd expendable. Pace Going into his 13th year age is an issue. Injury is another issue. However, two things: A third round pick is cheep for a tackle like Pace. We have shown in the past not to have too many problems bringing aged lineman. Second, imagine being Pace, locked into a long term deal and knowing your team will suck. That I would think would affect your offseason conditioning. Maybe a change of scenery and change of field surface would give him a couple of years left. If Gross can't be had than maybe Pace would be an option if his salary isn't too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 I love Holt. He loves Hester so he can do some tutoring there, and he has great hands, still. I'd give up a 4th this year and a 5th next year (or this year) for him for sure, though. Maybe then if we think Bennett can be a #3 or #4, we can sign Holt, and wait to draft a WR until round 3 while we get an OG and DE with our first 3 picks, in no order. Or, we can still go WR with our 18th pick and start forming a solid WR corps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradjock Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 No and No. At least not at the price they're at now. According to Profootballtalk.com, Holt is due to make 6.6 million next year and Pace 5.9. Not to mention, Holt turns 33 in June, and Pace turns 34 in November. Due to the money + age, and when you consider their bad seasons: Holt only caught for 796 yards, and Pace has been injured the last two years, neither one is worth trading for. If they were cut that might change things. Granted Holt would automatically be our best WR. But I'm not sure that an injured Pace is an upgrade over a meriocre John Tait. Would we have any interest in Holt or Pace? http://www.rotoworld.com/content/HeadLines...L&hl=138939 Holt: Good hands and with his age isn't as much of a deep threat as he once was. For other teams that would be a problem. But with a dink and dunk offense that focuses on accuracy and has limited creativity. Holt would allow Lloyd expendable. Pace Going into his 13th year age is an issue. Injury is another issue. However, two things: A third round pick is cheep for a tackle like Pace. We have shown in the past not to have too many problems bringing aged lineman. Second, imagine being Pace, locked into a long term deal and knowing your team will suck. That I would think would affect your offseason conditioning. Maybe a change of scenery and change of field surface would give him a couple of years left. If Gross can't be had than maybe Pace would be an option if his salary isn't too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 I'd gladly take Holt for a 3rd if he'd re-work his contract a bit. As for Pace, no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 I'd gladly take Holt for a 3rd if he'd re-work his contract a bit. As for Pace, no. Since we should have 2 3rds this yr (Berrian comp), I agree. Agreed on Pace as well. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 I bet nobody bites on a trade for either guy and then end up cutting them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 I bet nobody bites on a trade for either guy and then end up cutting them. That'd be good. Although if that happens, some team like Seattle might give Holt way more then he's worth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABEARSDABOMB Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Holt would be a fantastic acquisition. His numbers stalled because of poor QB play, not necessarily because he's not an above average receiver. Get er done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Holt could help... Not sure Pace is worth it at this point. I don't think we're close enough to bring him in. I'd rather get younger on the line. Would we have any interest in Holt or Pace? http://www.rotoworld.com/content/HeadLines...L&hl=138939 Holt: Good hands and with his age isn't as much of a deep threat as he once was. For other teams that would be a problem. But with a dink and dunk offense that focuses on accuracy and has limited creativity. Holt would allow Lloyd expendable. Pace Going into his 13th year age is an issue. Injury is another issue. However, two things: A third round pick is cheep for a tackle like Pace. We have shown in the past not to have too many problems bringing aged lineman. Second, imagine being Pace, locked into a long term deal and knowing your team will suck. That I would think would affect your offseason conditioning. Maybe a change of scenery and change of field surface would give him a couple of years left. If Gross can't be had than maybe Pace would be an option if his salary isn't too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.