madlithuanian Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 http://www.nflplayers.com/images/fck/FINAL...20Ownership.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 http://www.nflplayers.com/images/fck/FINAL...20Ownership.pdf It's conclusive! Thanks for the read Madlith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azbearsfan Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 It's conclusive! Thanks for the read Madlith. Yeah, but I bet if the owners had somebody do research on their behalf, that firm would find that the owners aren't making that much money. The only way I would half believe such stats and charts is if the commish's office or a third party with no affiliation to either side did the study. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfoligno Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 I had the same thought. The NFLPA paid for this report. What did anyone expect it to say. Further, as the report mentions, they are not exactly going off known numbers. W/ the exception of GB, they did not have the other 31 teams books open to them, and thus I think all "evidence" is a tad questionable. Yeah, but I bet if the owners had somebody do research on their behalf, that firm would find that the owners aren't making that much money. The only way I would half believe such stats and charts is if the commish's office or a third party with no affiliation to either side did the study. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Yeah, but I bet if the owners had somebody do research on their behalf, that firm would find that the owners aren't making that much money. The only way I would half believe such stats and charts is if the commish's office or a third party with no affiliation to either side did the study. I had the same thought. The NFLPA paid for this report. What did anyone expect it to say. Further, as the report mentions, they are not exactly going off known numbers. W/ the exception of GB, they did not have the other 31 teams books open to them, and thus I think all "evidence" is a tad questionable. Ha! I knew someone would fall for my little snare. All I said was "It's conclusive!" PT Barnum said, "There's a sucker born every minute." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azbearsfan Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Ha! I knew someone would fall for my little snare. All I said was "It's conclusive!" PT Barnum said, "There's a sucker born every minute." Right...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Right...... C'mon, you gotta find a little humor in it... I'll admit the baiting was a tad slanted, just in knowing I am a card carrying McCaskey basher. My statement almost read, "It's conclusive the McCaskey's are..." The 1st word that would have popped into everyone's head would have been "cheap". (whether anyone felt that way or not) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted March 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Evil... That's my first thought about the McCaskeys! They are purposefully sabbotaging the city's best loved team! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.