jason Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 #1 - It looked like Clark gave an inside juke when Cutler was rolling out, so Cutler threw it to lead for THAT route. Oops. Clark went the other way. #2 - That's just a great play by a packer DL. #3 - It looked like the WR (who?) gave an inside juke when Cutler was rolling out, so Cutler threw it to lead for THAT route. Oops. Clark went the other way. #4 - Forced throw by Cutler. He was trying to win the game by himself, and he shouldn't have thrown it. So, I'd say that's 2/4. Sure, we could take away the second INT because it was simply an unreal play by the defensive player, but we could also give Cutler one or two that the Packers dropped. Not a great start, but not nearly as bad as it looked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 #1 - It looked like Clark gave an inside juke when Cutler was rolling out, so Cutler threw it to lead for THAT route. Oops. Clark went the other way. #2 - That's just a great play by a packer DL. #3 - It looked like the WR (who?) gave an inside juke when Cutler was rolling out, so Cutler threw it to lead for THAT route. Oops. Clark went the other way. #4 - Forced throw by Cutler. He was trying to win the game by himself, and he shouldn't have thrown it. So, I'd say that's 2/4. Sure, we could take away the second INT because it was simply an unreal play by the defensive player, but we could also give Cutler one or two that the Packers dropped. Not a great start, but not nearly as bad as it looked. If Clark catches that pass that went right through his hands on the previous play in the endzone, there wouldn't have been an INT. Just saying.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 If Clark catches that pass that went right through his hands on the previous play in the endzone, there wouldn't have been an INT. Just saying.. ya no shit, play designed especially for you and u cant catch the ball. It was a mess of a game and with our injuries. looks like 0-4 going into the bye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 ya no shit, play designed especially for you and u cant catch the ball. It was a mess of a game and with our injuries. looks like 0-4 going into the bye. I can see us losing the next 2 (I am actually taking us over Pittsburgh but a loss is more than possible) but there is no way we lose to De-toilet. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bschmaranz Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 I can see us losing the next 2 (I am actually taking us over Pittsburgh but a loss is more than possible) but there is no way we lose to De-toilet. Peace Agreed. With our newly found pass rushing abilities we should be able to rattle the shit out of Stafford. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.