Alaskan Grizzly Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 I still think the Bears will sign one of each, if not both, a notable at WR and/or OL. There are too many to ponder at both positions but something tells me that despite all the talk contrary, the Bears will sign a big bodied WR. And of those I have a feeling one of these will be it: Vincent Jackson, Braylon Edwards, Plaxico Burress or yes..I'll say it Randy Moss. I know the last two are troubling off camera but in both cases I think they are set to redeem themselves. And I have NEVER been a Moss fan but something tells me that he might just work out in Chicago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 id personally love Moss. I think we get a Mid Level OG - Clabo maybe and an OT probably a guy thats 30 or 31 And if not Moss Id see us end up with Braylon Edwards...would piss me off cuz ill never forget the dropped TD pass in the playoffs..but hed be good for us I also see us gettong a OLB - i like Carolinas Anderson...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chitownhustla Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 This is going to be a very interesting week!!!! Clayton said we were the dark horse for B Edwards. Im kind of iffy on this guy, during his time at Cleveland he dropped way to many passes. I know he was better last year but the tendencey to drop passes is there. He also is a dumb ass off the field, fights with Lebron's crew and DUI's. I guess he would be an upgrade from what we have, tall some what of a number 1 WR. I wonder if the Cullen Jenkins talk is true too? How about AA, we going to resign him?? Would eveyone agree that the major area's of concern are WR, OL, DL and S? In no particular order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flea Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 I'd add in CB there Tillman iisn't getting any younger & I'm not convinced by our back-ups. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chitownhustla Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 I'd add in CB there Tillman iisn't getting any younger & I'm not convinced by our back-ups. Now they are saying we are not going after a top tier WR but interested in Brad Smith. I hope this a smoke screen. We need more then Brad Smith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearsFan1974 Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 Now they are saying we are not going after a top tier WR but interested in Brad Smith. I hope this a smoke screen. We need more then Brad Smith. 12.8 Receptions a year ain't gonna cut it for me...We need Rice or Moss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 All I know is that we appear to have plenty of room to work something bigger than run of the mill guys... Let's make it happen Bears! Get some legit talent on the OL, at WR! Then shore up the DL and secondary! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 Brad Smith is all but useless especially on this team. Get a WR who has played WR in the nfl. i think OL-WR-DL-OLB are the priorities in that order. jamarcus Webb sucks, either have Carimi or Williams be LT. anyone have a thought on Steve Smith (NY) ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 I just read a little bit on the Bears board and people have been saying that a couple of ESPN radio guys along with John Clayton mentioned Asomghua as a candidate for the Bears. That would be pretty incredible if we got him to lock down every NFL receiver, including C Johnson and Greg Jennings twice a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 Dont see Asamuough(sp) at all. Way too many holes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 Dont see Asamuough(sp) at all. Way too many holes With as far below the cap floor as the Bears are, they could be a dark horse for him, but I think someone will bid stupider money for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 I'd rather spend the money on Cullen Jenkins, and a good starting OG like Nicks. Probably still have enough left over to add in a decent second tier FA WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 If we got someone like Sidney Rice and an OG I'd be thrilled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 That would be a hell of a signing... But, I hope that won't be the only splash. I just read a little bit on the Bears board and people have been saying that a couple of ESPN radio guys along with John Clayton mentioned Asomghua as a candidate for the Bears. That would be pretty incredible if we got him to lock down every NFL receiver, including C Johnson and Greg Jennings twice a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 I tend to agree... With as far below the cap floor as the Bears are, they could be a dark horse for him, but I think someone will bid stupider money for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 Bingo! I want a big body WR and a big man on the OL! If we got someone like Sidney Rice and an OG I'd be thrilled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan Grizzly Posted July 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2011 In an update i heard this morning, on the "Herd", apparently teams won't be able to sign FA's until 6pm on Friday. Teams can, however, "talk" to players from today on. So prepare for much rumoring and posturing for the next 4-5 days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted July 26, 2011 Report Share Posted July 26, 2011 Yes, they can negotiate with any FA starting I believe Tue and so the rumor mill will be white hot. As I said last week, players and teams know there is precious little time to negotiate deals Even if they aren't signed we'll be hearing of handshake agreements before Friday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted July 26, 2011 Report Share Posted July 26, 2011 Yes, they can negotiate with any FA starting I believe Tue and so the rumor mill will be white hot. As I said last week, players and teams know there is precious little time to negotiate deals Even if they aren't signed we'll be hearing of handshake agreements before Friday. Hopefully we get a OT that can eventually play OG after Carmi and Webb is ready. I think we also get a inexpensive OG something on the order of a Ruben Brown. The only big splash we make is Cullen Jenkins. A CB and WR, but no big names. I think Brad Smith is a possiblity. He wont be expensive and can run the wildcat. Not my first choice but could be intriuging with Martz. Hopefully they can get Marshall/CB/Carolina, a descent player. They will resign Krutez and Adams, and a couple of our LBs. Meaning Roach will be our SLB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted July 26, 2011 Report Share Posted July 26, 2011 I attached the schedule I received from the Bears earlier tonight. Peace Bears_schedule.doc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted July 26, 2011 Report Share Posted July 26, 2011 Im not a Sid Rice fan really. Only existed one season then got got hurt. I think hell get too much money and not care anymore. Although in case of oversight, would be cool to screw Minnesota over Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted July 26, 2011 Report Share Posted July 26, 2011 Hopefully we get a OT that can eventually play OG after Carmi and Webb is ready. I think we also get a inexpensive OG something on the order of a Ruben Brown. The only big splash we make is Cullen Jenkins. A CB and WR, but no big names. I think Brad Smith is a possiblity. He wont be expensive and can run the wildcat. Not my first choice but could be intriuging with Martz. Hopefully they can get Marshall/CB/Carolina, a descent player. They will resign Krutez and Adams, and a couple of our LBs. Meaning Roach will be our SLB. IMO the wildcat is a wasted play. We have one of the better QBs in the NFL why take him off the field? All it does is shrink the field the defense has to cover. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradjock Posted July 26, 2011 Report Share Posted July 26, 2011 IMO the wildcat is a wasted play. We have one of the better QBs in the NFL why take him off the field? All it does is shrink the field the defense has to cover. The wildcat isn't a wasted play. It's a useful tool for teams that heavily focus on a running game and have really bad quarterbacks. Hub Arkush mentioned the Bears were rumored to want Brad Smith. Does that mean we think Cutler's awful? Teams with good QB's don't resort to the wildcat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted July 26, 2011 Report Share Posted July 26, 2011 The wildcat isn't a wasted play. It's a useful tool for teams that heavily focus on a running game and have really bad quarterbacks. Hub Arkush mentioned the Bears were rumored to want Brad Smith. Does that mean we think Cutler's awful? Teams with good QB's don't resort to the wildcat. It's not a wasted play...but it can be a wasted play if teams expect it. The original idea was that you take the QB out and now you get an extra blocker, you're playing 10 on 11 with the ballcarrier instead of 9 on 11. But, teams have figured that out, they see it coming because the QB isn't out so they tee off on the RB and ignore the decoys, since the RB isn't going to accurately toss the ball across the field. Miami got a big surge in yards when they introduced it but last year it was less effective than their normal offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted July 26, 2011 Report Share Posted July 26, 2011 I'd add in CB there Tillman iisn't getting any younger & I'm not convinced by our back-ups. This would actually be an excellent year to look at a CB upgrade because it's a deep position in FA and the top teams won't be competing for the middle-of-the-pack guys since they'll all be after the #1 player. I think this is the first time ever a free-agency period has 10 solid starters at an important position like cornerback. I don't recall ever seeing one spot so full of restricted and unrestricted guys who can help a good team. From Nnamdi Asomugha all the way down to Kelly Jennings, it's a heck of a solid group. Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writ...l#ixzz1TDkvAzIB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.