jason Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 http://www.nfl.com/features/bracketology/a...meteams?round=5 Seriously?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan Grizzly Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 http://www.nfl.com/features/bracketology/a...meteams?round=5 Seriously?! I dunno, from looking at the start of this bracketology where there were several Packer teams listed (and only one Bears team), I like what I see in the 1/4 finals. (No Packer teams and the same Bears team). Is it cheezy? Yep but ignorant? If it had been still dominated by Packers teams then yes it is ignorant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted March 29, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 You didn't go to the finals...where the 85 Bears somehow lost in the S.Finals to the Raiders. That's what is so ignorant. No way that Raiders team hangs with the 85 Bears. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan Grizzly Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 You didn't go to the finals...where the 85 Bears somehow lost in the S.Finals to the Raiders. That's what is so ignorant. No way that Raiders team hangs with the 85 Bears. Oh, the link went to the 1/4 finals and then I went back (seeing that voting closed tomorrow). Anyhow, yes it is ignorant. Yes the '76 Raiders could not hold a bucket of water next to the '85 Beloved. The '00 Ravens were probably the closest matched (and have been compared many times). But still I am happy to see that the Pack, who was vastly represented at the offset, was not in the later rounds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesson44 Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 Oh, the link went to the 1/4 finals and then I went back (seeing that voting closed tomorrow). Anyhow, yes it is ignorant. Yes the '76 Raiders could not hold a bucket of water next to the '85 Beloved. The '00 Ravens were probably the closest matched (and have been compared many times). But still I am happy to see that the Pack, who was vastly represented at the offset, was not in the later rounds. The 85 Bears should have won this hands down Raiders we good but not great that year, the 00 Ravens was led by thier defense with a running game Dilfer was a middle of the road QB. We beat those two with our defense and sweetness easy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 Wow. That's the dumbest thing ever. The idea of rule by masses is rule by asses is proven here 100%... http://www.nfl.com/features/bracketology/a...meteams?round=5 Seriously?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 Seriously. I can tolerate losing to one of the SF teams...there is some debate I suppose. But to the freakin' Raiders or even Ravens? What? This poll is even more useless than a political one. You didn't go to the finals...where the 85 Bears somehow lost in the S.Finals to the Raiders. That's what is so ignorant. No way that Raiders team hangs with the 85 Bears. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted March 29, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 I think people forget that the Bears had a damn good offense the year they had the best defense in the history of the league. Not only could they shut you out, they could put up 30. Even if the Raiders had the "best OL of all time" that year, it wouldn't have been able to withstand the speed, power, and sheer numbers of the 46. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.