adam Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 I thought he was pretty spot on about DE, OLine, CB, DT, and WR as all need areas. I wouldn't, however have them in that order. Also, this last line of the article confuses me: And they could always use special-teams help, especially after losing Corey Graham and Sam Hurd. So we lose Graham and Hurd, and acquire Costanzo, Weems, and Thomas, and we need help on Special Teams? http://www.suntimes.com/sports/11924965-60...-to-figure.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemonej Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 I thought he was pretty spot on about DE, OLine, CB, DT, and WR as all need areas. I wouldn't, however have them in that order. Also, this last line of the article confuses me: So we lose Graham and Hurd, and acquire Costanzo, Weems, and Thomas, and we need help on Special Teams? http://www.suntimes.com/sports/11924965-60...-to-figure.html I think safety should have been included because of after Conte,Wright and Steltz there is no depth and Wright has durability issues as well as Conte. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockren Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 I think safety should have been included because of after Conte,Wright and Steltz there is no depth and Wright has durability issues as well as Conte. I think Conte will be a nice player for us, but I agree they need help. Wright can go away as I wouldn't mind him being cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemonej Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 I think Conte will be a nice player for us, but I agree they need help. Wright can go away as I wouldn't mind him being cut. Is it me or does it seem that Wright fits with all the drafted and cut safeties in previous years? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 Is it me or does it seem that Wright fits with all the drafted and cut safeties in previous years? I agree, not looking good going forward, the problem is a weak draft for safeties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradjock Posted April 16, 2012 Report Share Posted April 16, 2012 I think safety should have been included because of after Conte,Wright and Steltz there is no depth and Wright has durability issues as well as Conte. Agreed. But now that you mention, they could have literally mentioned EVERY position with the exception of RB, QB, and kicking. On offense, along with the o-line, we need upgrades at WR & TE. On defense, we need every position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted April 17, 2012 Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 Agreed. But now that you mention, they could have literally mentioned EVERY position with the exception of RB, QB, and kicking. On offense, along with the o-line, we need upgrades at WR & TE. On defense, we need every position. I don't care what positions we draft as long as the first four picks turn out good players, to many weak spots . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.