Guest TerraTor Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 http://sports.yahoo.com/news/texans-lb-dob...13170--nfl.html They only got one of the calls right. Look at all the times Eli and Romo are further "across" the LOS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chitownhustla Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 http://sports.yahoo.com/news/texans-lb-dob...13170--nfl.html They only got one of the calls right. Look at all the times Eli and Romo are further "across" the LOS the dickhead actually says Cutler ran into him and that he hit Cutler in the chest. uber douche! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted November 15, 2012 Report Share Posted November 15, 2012 The funny part is...the 49.5 was the LOS. Cutler's heel is still on that line. The fact that they missed it and then missed it again when Lovie challenged is f***ing absurd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted November 15, 2012 Report Share Posted November 15, 2012 30 k for intentionally drilling a franchise qb and putting him out for a game or two is nothing compared to what we lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted November 15, 2012 Report Share Posted November 15, 2012 If the NFL is serious about stopping hits to the head, this clown should have been suspended. 30 k for intentionally drilling a franchise qb and putting him out for a game or two is nothing compared to what we lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted November 15, 2012 Report Share Posted November 15, 2012 If the NFL is serious about stopping hits to the head, this clown should have been suspended. I have no issue with "first offense = fine, second offense = harsher". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted November 15, 2012 Report Share Posted November 15, 2012 I have a problem with the guy saying he's glad he was Ko'ed...no remorse. In fact, glee. This guys were told the rules. Suspend. I have no issue with "first offense = fine, second offense = harsher". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChileBear Posted November 15, 2012 Report Share Posted November 15, 2012 I have a problem with the guy saying he's glad he was Ko'ed...no remorse. In fact, glee. This guys were told the rules. Suspend. I agree Madlith. The guy was boasting that he hurt the QB. Sure, a great hit is one thing, but if the rues are in place to protect the QB and the guy boasts after the hit, it goes beyond "first offense." If the league really wanted to crack down they'd start suspending guys for a game. Soccer's got that down, a red card and you sit next game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted November 16, 2012 Report Share Posted November 16, 2012 I agree Madlith. The guy was boasting that he hurt the QB. Sure, a great hit is one thing, but if the rues are in place to protect the QB and the guy boasts after the hit, it goes beyond "first offense." If the league really wanted to crack down they'd start suspending guys for a game. Soccer's got that down, a red card and you sit next game. The nfl did suspend one guy on the broncos earlier this year for a hit on Matt Schaub that knocked him out...but it was a hit that came the week after he was fined for a roughing the passer penalty, so it was a repeat performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted November 17, 2012 Report Share Posted November 17, 2012 They could also do it based on the injury length of the other player. Every week the injured player is out, the offender should be suspended (and lose his game check) for the same amount of games. That seems fair to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted November 18, 2012 Report Share Posted November 18, 2012 They could also do it based on the injury length of the other player. Every week the injured player is out, the offender should be suspended (and lose his game check) for the same amount of games. That seems fair to me. Problem with that is..."The intensity of the hit" isn't the only thing that determines how long a guy is out. You can give a guy a serious concussion with a legal hit, and you can have a guy miss no time after the hardest illegal hit of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted November 18, 2012 Report Share Posted November 18, 2012 Problem with that is..."The intensity of the hit" isn't the only thing that determines how long a guy is out. You can give a guy a serious concussion with a legal hit, and you can have a guy miss no time after the hardest illegal hit of the season. I was only saying if it was an illegal hit that would be fined anyway or resulted in a flag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.