lemonej Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 20. Tyler Eifert TE Notre Dame 50. Terron Armstead OT Ark-Pine Bluff 114. Zaviar Gooden OLB Mizzou 146 Kejon Barner RB Oregon 178 Garrett Gilkey OG Chadron ST This is my first shot at this for the year .OK let it rip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Not bad. I'd prefer to get Fluker in round 1 and go TE in round 2, though. I'll take a G in round 5 over a LB too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 20. Tyler Eifert TE Notre Dame 50. Terron Armstead OT Ark-Pine Bluff 114. Zaviar Gooden OLB Mizzou 146 Kejon Barner RB Oregon 178 Garrett Gilkey OG Chadron ST This is my first shot at this for the year .OK let it rip. I could lived with that, Armstead might not be there after great combine numbers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 If we got Andy Levitre or another competent LG in FA then I can get down with this. Armstead won't be the answer if he's playing next crap at LG...no matter how fast he is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 If we got Andy Levitre or another competent LG in FA then I can get down with this. Armstead won't be the answer if he's playing next crap at LG...no matter how fast he is. In the second round will still could probably get a starting LG and Armstead might need some time to develope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Not bad. I'd prefer to get Fluker in round 1 and go TE in round 2, though. I'll take a G in round 5 over a LB too. Anyone else concerned we have 1 starting LB on the roster? Shae McC needs to go to OLB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Anyone else concerned we have 1 starting LB on the roster? Shae McC needs to go to OLB Roach is rumored to return. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 I like all three of the first 3 players you listed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Anyone else concerned we have 1 starting LB on the roster? Shae McC needs to go to OLB It looks like Urlacher will be back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 It looks like Urlacher will be back. I think if he demands 4 to 5 mi., he wont be back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingtwig Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Anyone else concerned we have 1 starting LB on the roster? Shae McC needs to go to OLB U can forget about that thought. Team has said on multiple occasions that he will stay at DE and have some packages as a LB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 It looks like Urlacher will be back. I haven't heard a word yet on Urlacher but this report on Roach has hit the interwebs... http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/bears/post...to-pursue-roach Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemonej Posted February 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 If we got Andy Levitre or another competent LG in FA then I can get down with this. Armstead won't be the answer if he's playing next crap at LG...no matter how fast he is. I'm thinking the answer at LG is Garza and they need to put Spencer at his natural position and bring in a kid undrafted to groom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 I haven't heard a word yet on Urlacher but this report on Roach has hit the interwebs... http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/bears/post...to-pursue-roach All these rumors are based on what writers think our needs are and all of a sudden they state a connect. There is a chance he will be back, but that dont take a lot of brain power to figure out, we may need to resign him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Honestly, i have a bit more faith in the new staff. If something dont work, change it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Not bad. I'd prefer to get Fluker in round 1 and go TE in round 2, though. I'll take a G in round 5 over a LB too. This. Also, I've seen some of the SWAC talent up close and personal, and I'm not all that excited about a SWAC player in the 2nd round (not saying some don't excel). It reeks of a Lovie Smith draft. If he were a DT I would think Lovie made Lemon type it out like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 I'm thinking the answer at LG is Garza and they need to put Spencer at his natural position and bring in a kid undrafted to groom. Yeah, crazy thought. Put Garza at his best position and put Spencer at his best position, which also just happens to be the position for which he was picked up. Been saying this ever since Spencer was signed. Doubt it will happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Yeah, crazy thought. Put Garza at his best position and put Spencer at his best position, which also just happens to be the position for which he was picked up. Been saying this ever since Spencer was signed. Doubt it will happen. Anything can happen this year, I doubt anyones position is solidified at this point with Kromer coming in. This all very well could happen but I'm not so sure it'd be ideal. Garza hasn't exactly been that good at OC which is supposed to be an easier position and he's getting up there in age. LG is a more demanding position, I'd rather draft the young guy with huge upside,Cooper in the first and let him win the job. Also for a guy who wants to improve the OL you sure are stickin with a lot of the same guys(so far you've said you want Carimi-Garza-Spencer-?-?) . Switching their positions might do something but not that much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 I'm thinking the answer at LG is Garza and they need to put Spencer at his natural position and bring in a kid undrafted to groom. spencer is a ufa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 All these rumors are based on what writers think our needs are and all of a sudden they state a connect. There is a chance he will be back, but that dont take a lot of brain power to figure out, we may need to resign him. According to the article there's a source telling them this. So to me that's more than just putting 2 and 2 together. A source is typically someone with inside information. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 I'm thinking the answer at LG is Garza and they need to put Spencer at his natural position and bring in a kid undrafted to groom. Spencer was the singularly worst player on the team last year. I do not want him back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted March 1, 2013 Report Share Posted March 1, 2013 Anything can happen this year, I doubt anyones position is solidified at this point with Kromer coming in. This all very well could happen but I'm not so sure it'd be ideal. Garza hasn't exactly been that good at OC which is supposed to be an easier position and he's getting up there in age. LG is a more demanding position, I'd rather draft the young guy with huge upside,Cooper in the first and let him win the job. Also for a guy who wants to improve the OL you sure are stickin with a lot of the same guys(so far you've said you want Carimi-Garza-Spencer-?-?) . Switching their positions might do something but not that much. I'm just used the status quo of "no draftees"+"no FAs". So I try to think of ways that the OL will get better with the pieces on roster. In my ideal world we get rid of both of them...well, maybe Garza sticks around for a year to help train up a young player. I have said since the beginning that when Spencer was signed he should have played center. That was the reason he was signed after all. As a replacement for Kreutz. But then the switcheroo happened, Garza left his OG home, Spencer left his C home, and the went all Little Red Riding Hood on us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.