scs787 Posted March 2, 2013 Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/...-chicago-bears/ Discuss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted March 2, 2013 Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 Somewhat subjective because they use their own criteria to come up with the "value". There is no way to quantify things that don't show up on stat sheet. I would say Peppers and Forte were not that bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted March 2, 2013 Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 Somewhat subjective because they use their own criteria to come up with the "value". There is no way to quantify things that don't show up on stat sheet. I would say Peppers and Forte were not that bad. Peppers had a decent year but not for the money he made. I believe he led all NFC 4-3 DE's in sacks, but think of it this way- he had 11 sacks but 27% of them (3) came against the Cardinals. Every good DE had a good game against Arizona. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balta1701-A Posted March 2, 2013 Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 Peppers had a decent year but not for the money he made. I believe he led all NFC 4-3 DE's in sacks, but think of it this way- he had 11 sacks but 27% of them (3) came against the Cardinals. Every good DE had a good game against Arizona. Of course, the usual question with Peppers is how much the rest of the line is opened up because of him drawing double-teamas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted March 2, 2013 Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 Of course, the usual question with Peppers is how much the rest of the line is opened up because of him drawing double-teamas. I agree with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.