Wesson44 Posted March 13, 2013 Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 The ones in bold i say we try to keep and fill the other spots by draft and FA and with players already on the roster. 32 Bell, Kahlil RB 5-11 212 26 4 UCLA 38 Bowman, Zack CB 6-1 193 28 5 Nebraska 2 Campbell, Jason QB 6-5 230 31 8 Auburn 93 Collins, Nate DT 6-2 296 25 3 Virginia 24 Hayden, Kelvin CB 6-0 195 29 8 Illinois 58 Hayes, Geno LB 6-1 226 25 5 Florida State 71 Idonije, Israel DL 6-6 275 32 9 Manitoba (Canada) 60 Louis, Lance G 6-3 320 27 4 San Diego State 10 Mare, Olindo K 5-11 185 39 16 Syracuse 12 McCown, Josh QB 6-4 215 33 10 Sam Houston State 30 Moore, D.J. CB 5-9 180 25 4 Vanderbilt 43 Nolan, Troy S 6-2 202 26 4 Arizona State 91 Okoye, Amobi DT 6-2 292 25 6 Louisville 62 Rachal, Chilo G 6-5 323 26 5 USC 53 Roach, Nick LB 6-1 234 27 6 Northwestern 79 Scott, Jonathan T 6-6 318 30 6 Texas 67 Spencer, Chris G/C 6-3 309 30 8 Mississippi 54 Urlacher, Brian LB 6-4 258 34 13 New Mexico Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted March 13, 2013 Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 It'd be really nice to see Roach and a discounted Urlacher back. It would really open the door to do something crazy like drafting yet another toy for Jay Cutler to play with. Not that I really see it as a need but a 1st round WR would be really intriguing and it would also hurt the Vikings who are gonna need to add a WR even if they do get a Cruz or Jennings. I agree with all the guys you have bolded but wouldn't be mad if they let Scott go. RT and swing tackle should be locked down with Webb & Carimi...One of the CBs would be nice as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'TD' Posted March 13, 2013 Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 I would only keep 3. 1) Collins - to see what he has and will be cheap. 2) Bell - preforms well. Probably better than most UDFA's that could be brought in or vet minimum RB's and I don't want to see a pick spent on the position. 3) Urlacher or Roach - If Roach has all the interest from other teams, he can go there. If he wants to come back for under 2 mil a year, then I'd welcome him back. If Urlacher can come back considerably cheap, he'd be worth it just for the locker room presence with the transition to a new coaching staff. In which case, I'd let roach go. People that I'd consider keeping if there was more money to go around... Hayden - He's 29 years old and the Bears need to bring in some younger CB's. Hopefully they can find a prospect in the 4th or 5th that can play nickel. Israel Idonije - Solid performer, but not worth having to clear up more money to sign. He's 32 and some younger players could be found through the draft or UDFA Lance Louis - Fairly unimpressive to me most of the year and hurt. I'm wanting to see an influx of new faces on the line, at least one vet G, a G and C in the draft, and some UDFA's. Jonathan Scott - Once again, unimpressive to me. I'd rather look other places for the price. He and Louis just become odd men out in what in what I'd like to see happen with the team. If the extra money was there I would let both compete for a roster spot tho. Urlacher or Roach - Whichever on i did not keep earlier for money reasons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted March 13, 2013 Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 I would only keep 3. 1) Collins - to see what he has and will be cheap. 2) Bell - preforms well. Probably better than most UDFA's that could be brought in or vet minimum RB's and I don't want to see a pick spent on the position. 3) Urlacher or Roach - If Roach has all the interest from other teams, he can go there. If he wants to come back for under 2 mil a year, then I'd welcome him back. If Urlacher can come back considerably cheap, he'd be worth it just for the locker room presence with the transition to a new coaching staff. In which case, I'd let roach go. People that I'd consider keeping if there was more money to go around... Hayden - He's 29 years old and the Bears need to bring in some younger CB's. Hopefully they can find a prospect in the 4th or 5th that can play nickel. Israel Idonije - Solid performer, but not worth having to clear up more money to sign. He's 32 and some younger players could be found through the draft or UDFA Lance Louis - Fairly unimpressive to me most of the year and hurt. I'm wanting to see an influx of new faces on the line, at least one vet G, a G and C in the draft, and some UDFA's. Jonathan Scott - Once again, unimpressive to me. I'd rather look other places for the price. He and Louis just become odd men out in what in what I'd like to see happen with the team. If the extra money was there I would let both compete for a roster spot tho. Urlacher or Roach - Whichever on i did not keep earlier for money reasons Now that they have Bushrod, they wont be signing Scott. Carmi and Webb fight it out for the RT job and the other is the swing tackle. We wont be making anymore splashes in FAgency. We will be signing some of our own guys and grabbing some 2nd tier roster players. I think they plan on Louis at RG or the darkhorse Brown and will draft a LG in the draft. The first two picks will be a OL and a LB. Those are still needs to address. If we resign Urh and Roach, that falls to the 4th and 5th round status. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted March 13, 2013 Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 I would only keep 3. 1) Collins - to see what he has and will be cheap. 2) Bell - preforms well. Probably better than most UDFA's that could be brought in or vet minimum RB's and I don't want to see a pick spent on the position. 3) Urlacher or Roach - If Roach has all the interest from other teams, he can go there. If he wants to come back for under 2 mil a year, then I'd welcome him back. If Urlacher can come back considerably cheap, he'd be worth it just for the locker room presence with the transition to a new coaching staff. In which case, I'd let roach go. People that I'd consider keeping if there was more money to go around... Hayden - He's 29 years old and the Bears need to bring in some younger CB's. Hopefully they can find a prospect in the 4th or 5th that can play nickel. Israel Idonije - Solid performer, but not worth having to clear up more money to sign. He's 32 and some younger players could be found through the draft or UDFA Lance Louis - Fairly unimpressive to me most of the year and hurt. I'm wanting to see an influx of new faces on the line, at least one vet G, a G and C in the draft, and some UDFA's. Jonathan Scott - Once again, unimpressive to me. I'd rather look other places for the price. He and Louis just become odd men out in what in what I'd like to see happen with the team. If the extra money was there I would let both compete for a roster spot tho. Urlacher or Roach - Whichever on i did not keep earlier for money reasons Armando Allen was brought back, and with the plans to utilize a FB they probably don't carry 4 RBs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.